US Southern Border being over run?

Seeing a lot of news stories about waves of illegals crossing into the u.s due to a change in immigration policy - Apparently persons crossing the border are given the equivalent of a ticket and released now.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/11/surge-illegals-blamed-us-policy/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/06/10/Report-Illegals-Waving-at-Agents-to-Detain-Them-Near-Border-Hoping-for-Permit-to-Remain-in-US

Anyone know anything about it? Thoughts?

skippy skippy
Jun '14

I boy, get the popcorn this is gonna get good quick


Microwave going as I type. ;-)

Calico696 Calico696
Jun '14

Melted butter ready to go...

Spring Fever Spring Fever
Jun '14

Pour yourself a drink

Bessie Bessie
Jun '14

This one should get hot enough to pop the corn for you! Just pour a drink and wait a bit.


Over Memorial day weekend i met a women who's son is a border patrol agent, through general conversation she started telling me about the daily dangerous encounters her son deals with guarding our borders every day,being the mother of an Iraq war veteran i could really relate to what she was saying..our border patrol is severely understaffed, I wish all of you could have heard her words...you would be blown away by what these agents deal with on our own soil ..these agents are in a war zone of there own..I know the fear this mother lives with every day..I pray for reform and their safety every day..

G-ma
Jun '14

This has been going on for a while but has now become a critical situation. Homeland Security and ICE have turned a blind eye to the problem. Border patrol officers have been complaining up the chain to no avail. Mexico has some blame in this also as they are letting these people from Central America pass through their country to get here. Probably a lot of people getting bribed in the process to allow this. We are a bunch of suckers and us. taxpayers will be footing the bill AGAIN.

kb2755 kb2755
Jun '14

That's why this war on terror is a complete joke! Strip searching old ladies at airports while they leave our southern border wide open.


Lol Calico696!

Bella76 Bella76
Jun '14

LOL @posts 2-6!

However, on a more serious note, have you all read about the surge in unaccompanied minors coming across the Texas border? The numbers are truly alarming. Mere children, and they are trying to get through the Texas brush alone. What an awful situation.

Rebecka Rebecka
Jun '14

Hi Rebecka! I sent you a PM about your friends. Please let me know :) thanks

Bella76 Bella76
Jun '14

Will get their tel number to you in the morning, Bella. :-)

Rebecka Rebecka
Jun '14

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/09/lawmakers-fault-lax-obama-immigration-policies-for-calamity-in-arizona/


The central american newspapers have run articles indicating the Obama has promised amnesty to all that come into the country. While this is not true it is how is actions and speech are being interpreted. I also have a acquaintance that works for the border patrol, he has indicated that for all intents and purposes we have no border control anymore, except at defined crossing points (roads and bridges) he says there are so many people coming in and basically their hands are tied to do anything but process them, when possible, and send them to ICE.
This is a crisis for so many reasons but has long been a pillar of action for the progressives. The country is crumbling on so many fronts now as we arm Mexican drug cartels, allow government agencies to monitor everything we do, allow the IRS to target groups of citizens based on their political beliefs, allow our diplomats to be mercilessly killed and then openly lie about the cause, free 5 of the worst terrorists on the planet for a deserter and defector while a marine rots in a Mexican jail.
But as our esteemed Hillary Clinton stated what difference does it make...


9pm.... The Kelly File on Fox

Gardenfish Gardenfish
Jun '14

Well, this one seems true on all levels including the administration changing the rules to declare "mission accomplished." Even if that were OK, did we have to spend more money to do it?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/us/immigrant-population-shows-signs-of-growth-estimates-show.html?_r=0

http://cis.org/ICE-Illegal-Immigrant-Deportations

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

"Strip searching old ladies at airports while they leave our southern border wide open."

At a cost of $7 Billion per year for the TSA.

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jun '14

looks like the DHS is flying detainees to Mass as well and releasing them there

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/380076/new-dumping-grounds-michelle-malkin

DHS is asking for $1BB for children crossing the border

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/10/homeland-security-chief-admits-to-need-for-border-/

skippy skippy
Jun '14

"looks like the DHS is flying detainees to Mass as well and releasing them there"

I guess they needed some "D" votes up there...

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jun '14

I had such great hopes for Obama when he originally ran. He has made some truly great decisions,(Getting Osama bin ladin, The Captain Phillips situation,) but overall he has been a real disaster.
He involves himself in minor racial issues and ignores the bigger picture.
He seems to want to take from those of us who worked their entire lives for what we have, and give it to those who have decided to abuse the Welfare system.
Obama care is a nightmare and has caused so much grief , but illegals can go into any emergency room for medical care on the taxpayers dime and no cost to them..
Allowing children of illegals to register in the school systems.
Signaling to non citizens that although we have laws , we wont enforce immigration policys. Its not the Border Patrols fault or ICE, these decisions to ignore the situation come directly from the top. And in almost every case its the middle class that are paying for it..
Most americans can trace their roots to other countries, but our ancesters came to this country through legal channels. I have no problem with those that do this, but the cost to taxpayers to allow what is happening now will break us if it keeps going..

boobalaa boobalaa
Jun '14

Lots of good points there, boobalaa.

Spring Fever Spring Fever
Jun '14

agreed Boobalaa

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Hey, you're not allowed to criticize Obama. That automatically makes you a racist.

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jun '14

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/06/11/Crisis-Leaves-Border-Unprotected-Cartels-in-Control-Says-BP-Union

“Mexican cartels are exploiting this crisis to get their shipments through. They know our schedules, our shifts, our manpower, and how we react to these situations,”

anyone else think the national guard should be deployed to assist in controlling this?

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Absolutely in agreement...it's long over due.

Spring Fever Spring Fever
Jun '14

can't argue the truth, this president is ineffective, not good and is possibly the worst president in american history

can our country survive this administration?

time to impeach, the lawlessness cannot be allowed to continue

obama has become the president that nixon always wanted to be . . . . . .

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

As far as I'm concerned, for Obama, this is mission accomplished.

He has brought upon more destruction of the U.S. than all of the bumbling idiots before him combined.

hhs75
Jun '14

boobalaa, I so agree with you with the exception of ever having high hopes.
Unfortunately, there are so many voters being subsidized by this administration that they don't see how America is being destroyed. Those of us actually paying our own way are in the minority.

hhs75
Jun '14

ever see the list of laws this administration has violated?

https://www.committeeforjustice.org/content/25-violations-law-president-obama-and-his-administration

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Well, if Cantor's loss is any indication, the people ARE paying attention, and "throwing the bums out"... Cantor outspent his opponent by 10 TIMES, and still lost. That's saying something. His opponent's (Dave Brat) #1 issues were immigration (as in stopping the plan for amnesty and ACTUALLY securing the borders), and term limits.

JeffersonRepub JeffersonRepub
Jun '14

Obama has let me down in a number of areas as well. While Congress is worse, Obama is the leader and he should be able to make them work or make them leave. He has not been forthcoming and transparent on a number of issues. And we have been in hard times. But to vent your spleen with fact less ascertains without even researching the topics may make you feel better about your dilemma, but it ain't so. And while welfare cheats and illegals make easy targets for what's wrong in our lives, the fact is if we eradicated all illegals overnight, our economy would crash and you would be on welfare too. So, let's look at some of what your saying

"He involves himself in minor racial issues and ignores the bigger picture."
Perhaps the minor issues paint a bigger picture, but prove it.

"He seems to want to take from those of us who worked their entire lives for what we have, and give it to those who have decided to abuse the Welfare system."
The give: in 2009, taxes were the lowest in over 30 years under Obama. And it has stayed almost flat except for some loss of stimulus credits and deductions. He takes less from us than any President for the past 40 years.

The take: Although no one, including you, knows the exact amount of welfare abuse, most experts put it under 5%, many at 2%. American business loses 5% of its revenues to fraud each year and no of it to illegals. Instead it's all to people like the lamenter and his thieving class. The welfare cheats are a deal next to him.

"Obama care is a nightmare and has caused so much grief , but illegals can go into any emergency room for medical care on the taxpayers dime and no cost to them.."
Jury's still out on this one but for sure it was a rocky web site start and there are some higher prices out there, but no report generated on overall pricing affect. More Americans are insured than ever, less Americans get taxpayer assisted expensive emergency care for free; more kids 18-26 are protected than ever and we can claim parity with any other developed nation on health care coverage. Not exactly of bloody nightmare.

"Allowing children of illegals to register in the school systems."
This is a great one. This was a 1972 SCOTUS decision, Obama as 11-years old and not responsible for the SCOTUS then or now.

"Signaling to non citizens that although we have laws , we wont enforce immigration policys. Its not the Border Patrols fault or ICE, these decisions to ignore the situation come directly from the top. And in almost every case its the middle class that are paying for it.."
OK, this one seems true but can you prove the "from the top" part?

"Most americans can trace their roots to other countries, but our ancesters came to this country through legal channels. I have no problem with those that do this, but the cost to taxpayers to allow what is happening now will break us if it keeps going.."
Well no duh. There were no limitations beyond some undesirable classes until 1921 well after most of our ancestors got here so everyone was legal.

But the best was the dog's "can't argue the truth, this president is ineffective, not good and is possibly the worst president in american history." This guy can't even remember one President back. Can't spell Hoover. Well, it is a subjective category and depends whether you count advancing slavery, Indian genocide, imaginary wars, treasury plundering, or economic disaster, none of which Obama can be tagged with. And BDog did use the weasel-word "possibly," but worst ever ---- not likely. I have 5 - 10 others in front starting with Bush and you know which one.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

I think the problem is children crossing alone, the coyotes using the people to smuggle drugs across the border - this is a danger to the people involved and people on both sides of the border

skippy skippy
Jun '14

I think we should just open the Border to who ever wants to enter and then save a lot of tax money in fighting to keep people out because its not working because no one likes what I really would like to do and that's shoot first then look for green card

Caged Animal Caged Animal
Jun '14

"And while welfare cheats and illegals make easy targets for what's wrong in our lives, the fact is if we eradicated all illegals overnight, our economy would crash and you would be on welfare too."

So does it make sense just to kick out all the one's that are here today? Probably not.

Does it make sense to allow more in each and every day? Absolutely not.


You have to patch the boat before you can bail it out. Shut down the border - for real. Not just small teams of Border Patrol (which is probably one of the few LE agencies that we actually need). Line the Rio Grande with some M1A1 Abrams and APC's with a Ma Deuce on top. Use the military for protecting *our* borders, not some sand pit in WhoKnowsWhere-istan.

Open ONE gate, and check everyone coming in for their tickets. You want in? Someone already here legally needs to vouch for you, or you have to have a skill that cannot be fulfilled in the existing labor pool (like one of us trying to get a job in Australia).

You want to come in for humanitarian aid? Sure, just wait in this holding area (between Mexico and the US), learn English and take your citizenship test, and then become another tax paying American.

The same applies to the Canadian border. At the very least it may have kept Justin Bieber out of here.

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jun '14

"The same applies to the Canadian border. At the very least it may have kept Justin Bieber out of here."


!!!!!! ROFL

JeffersonRepub JeffersonRepub
Jun '14

Caged animal, that may actually solve the problem.

hhs75
Jun '14

http://www.nafbpo.org/

“This is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a predictable, orchestrated and contrived assault on the compassionate side of Americans by her political leaders that knowingly puts minor illegal alien children at risk for purely political purposes,”

Former border patrol officers seem to believe President Obama, is deliberately arranging for a flood of immigrant children to arrive in America for political purposes.

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Just to be fair to all of this. The majority of those kids coming right now are coming because their parents have already come up, are working and are paying the coyotes to bring their kids to them. The sense of urgency on their part is not related to Dream Act or anything else, but driven by a high spike in gang violence and dangerous atmospheres in their home countries. In short, the parents are rushing to get their kids out - and up here to be with them because it's becoming too dangerous at home. If it was Dream stuff, given Florida just signed into law in-state-tuition for illegals, you'de be able to walk from Havana to Key West on all the boats people would be using to get here.

Stephan Stephan
Jun '14

Ugh...mass hysteria. I just moved here from the West Coast and I have to say that though this community is filled with generally nice people there is such ignorance about Spanish speakers.

I encourage each of you to examine the root cause of this most recent wave of immigration to the United States. There is ALWAYS a socio-economic cause- from Irish, Italian, Chinese, Japanese to our Spanish speaking friends there is always a root.

Before we continue to spread misinformation, please I beg you...watch this video..THEN call your local farmer and stop buying food from Agri-business . YOU can stop the disintegration of the cultures and economies of Latin America.

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/9/25/harvest_of_empire_new_film_recounts?fb_action_ids=10151093542638004&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_ref=.UGNXdkIm5dY.like&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582

ImWhiteHabloEspanol ImWhiteHabloEspanol
Jun '14

I have no issues with protecting the borders especially if we are spending extra money to do it and not seeing better results. Not sure if we want to shoot them though Mark; that seems a tad extreme.

And let's stop all them furin tourists too. They're blocking my view and making me wait in lines.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

congress needs to impeach this failed lawless president, before he does more damage.

possibly the worst president in our entire history, worse than carter, worse than nixon, much worse than hoover and bush jr.

obama is power hungry, has an aggressive personal agenda and has truly become the president that nixon always wanted to be.

that's why i say he is not a nice guy, it's a facade, it's machiavellian,

this is not only my opinion, but a large swath of Americans feel the same way.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

I don't care what the root cause is. It's ILLEGAL. If I can't break the law, THEY can't break the law. PERIOD.

JeffersonRepub JeffersonRepub
Jun '14

Ahh the good ol' breakin the law point. Many of these children and families will be granted Amnesty because of the violence taking place in Mexico based on unfair US trade laws and archaic drug policies. To explain because I am sure you won't do your homework, we are purchasing their drugs and empowering drug lords while shutting down their economy as a result of NAFTA. WE have created war zones and these people have a human right to seek Amnesty in the United States. SO they are not actually breaking the law. Research your point Mr. Jerfferson Repub. Again I beg you. May peace and love be with you.

ImWhiteHabloEspanol ImWhiteHabloEspanol
Jun '14

Obama traded five of the most dangerous men on the planet for a deserter who abandoned his unit. really bad deal.Then Obama claimed that we don't leave people behind?

really?

what about Benghazi? He left them there to die . . . . .

then Obama claimed that Al-Qaeda is decimated and on the run but today Iraq is being lost to a powerfully resurgent Al-Qaeda, mission not accomplished. hang the failure on him, period.

the IRS was used during his campaign to target, attack and harrass his political opponents. that's illegal you know, and so far he has gotten away clean, why?

that's enough for now, but there is more, much more . . . .

lawless and Machiavellian, Obama has now become the president that Nixon always wanted to be . . . .

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

Sorry Hablo- illegal is illegal. Homework has nothing to do with it. Just because some gang member from inner city Trenton became a pusher and a killer because his dad was never there and his mom was on welfare, does not excuse his actions. Ditto the illegal immigrants. Want to come here? We only ask ONE thing- DO IT LEGALLY. (and learn english, but I'd settle for coming here legally thru the proper channels.)

JeffersonRepub JeffersonRepub
Jun '14

Didn't the U.S., under President Polk, steal the area that became some of those southwestern states like New Mexico, Arizona and California, from Mexico?


IDK, but if they did, does that also mean we owe TODAY'S african-americans reparations for something that happened to their great great grandfathers?

JeffersonRepub JeffersonRepub
Jun '14

Let's give California back to them.

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jun '14

Obama ignores the laws of our nation at his whim. He truly believes he is above the law:

from the article linked above here's a couple of examples: (there are many more):

President Obama, throughout his Presidency, has refused to enforce long-established U.S. immigration laws. For example . . .

More than 300,000 captured illegal aliens had been processed and were awaiting deportation. But, incredibly, Obama stopped these deportations and ordered the U.S. border patrol to release many of these illegal aliens in violation of law and without explanation.

Obama has refused to build a double-barrier security fence along the U.S.-Mexican border in direct violation of the 2006 Secure Fence Act. This law requires that "at least two layers of reinforced fencing" be built along America's 650-mile border with Mexico.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

All immigration should be stopped at once! Enough is enough. Country is being invaded and not happy about it. The laws that are on the books aren't being enforced at all !!! Makes me sick ! How can this country survive this invasion from not just the south but all over the world ???? Competition is intense for blue collar jobs and white collar jobs these days and one of the big factors is that immigration isn't even close to being controlled ! H1B1 visa should also be put on hold for a number of years !! It's crazy what is happening and lots of people here can't even figure out what is happening right before their very eyes ! I'm ready to march against immigration. If anyone knows of any please put locations in this thread !!!!!!!!!

One Vice
Jun '14

In the late 1930s thousands of Jewish children were smuggled and sent to the United States getting around US immigration law to save them from Nazi death camps. Was that OK?

Stephan Stephan
Jun '14

This is the presidential candidate who said that he wanted to fundamentally change the US. What the heck do you think he meant, given his background? His mother was a radical who hated this country. His father was socialist. He lived with his communist grandfather who hated America. The grandfathers best friend, who Obama said he idolized, was a communist. He went to a Muslim school as a child. He went to a radical church who preached the hatred of America. His best friend was Bill Ayers who was part of the Weather Underground. He was community organizer in an inner city. What on earth did you all expect? What surprises me, is that he won a second term. Are people that blind? If you voted for him the first time, I can concede that you were sweet talked, but to vote for him the second time, you are a moron. The only unfortunate thing is that the rest of us have to pay for your vote. Granted, this is my opinion, but I'm sure more and more are seeing the light.
Keep in mind, all of those illegal kids coming through the border need a place to live. With all the illegals in this town, don't be surprised if dozens don't find homes with their distant relatives in town. Swamping our schools, storming our hospital, and bringing childhood diseases back because they lack inoculations. Yes, we will be fundamentally changed!

USAfirst USAfirst
Jun '14

someone quick get me a shovel before it gets too deep in here

5catmom 5catmom
Jun '14

thanks skippy, you are spot on with this and the link above

using children in this way is a Machiavellian move to push forward an open borders policy. I believe what the retired border patrol agents are saying is true, and i said so at the start of this current crisis. The border patrol agents said:

“This is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a predictable, orchestrated and contrived assault on the compassionate side of Americans by her political leaders that knowingly puts minor illegal alien children at risk for purely political purposes,”

Former border patrol officers seem to believe President Obama, is deliberately arranging for a flood of immigrant children to arrive in America for political purposes.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

thanks BD I am concerned for the children who are victims

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Obama has removed more illegals than any other President, will be well over the 2M mark that G. Bush set by the end of his term. After 42 months in office, he removed about 33K per month against Bush at 21K. This is a record by any President.

Darn those statistics.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

'Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials last year released 68,000 illegal immigrants with criminal convictions, undercutting Democratic claims that President Obama has strictly enforced immigration laws"

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/202142-dhs-document-68000-illegal-immigrants-with-criminal-convictions-released-in

skippy skippy
Jun '14

The way they categorize deportations has changed. Nice try MG.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/04/21/lies-damned-lies-and-obamas-deportation-statistics/

kb2755 kb2755
Jun '14

KB, did you read the article? Did you understand it? It in no way disputes what MG wrote. The only small correction is that the over 2 million figure includes "removals" and "returns" if you use the technical language, but that's the same way Bush reported his statistics.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jun '14

Yes Gadfly I did read the article, it is easy to schew the numbers to show you are tough on immigration.

kb2755 kb2755
Jun '14

Nice try indeed. If you read the entire article, yes, you are correct that the ascertain that Obama removed more illegals than any other President is possibly incorrect pre-1996. That's a perhaps because no data is shown to prove it one way or the other. I estimate he has removed more only because for the past 18 years, he has vastly surpassed any other administration in the removal of illegals. And certainly Obama's high removal rate is true post 1996 so it is most certainly true for the past 18 years after the legal definition change.

Secondly, catch the end of the article, the correction: "CORRECTION: The original post claimed that Obama had de-emphasized removals and concentrated on returns and that the ratio of his removals to returns was skewed toward returns compared to his predecessors. That claim is not correct because based on DHS’s data, (Table 39: Aliens Removed and Returned, FY 1892-2012) his cumulative numbers since taking office show Obama has removed a total of 1,974,688 people and returned 1,609,055 others. There have been more returns than removals only in FY 2009 and 2010. Moreover, comparing across administrations is not wise given the changes in law and counting procedures." The last sentence is weasel wording their error since 1996 was the pivotal legal definition change.

Skippy, that fact that some illegals were released amazingly does not change the total number of removals. Plus, the article states: "The Center for Immigration Studies reports that ICE officials moved to deport 28 percent fewer illegal immigrants from the interior of the country in 2013 than in 2012" which is true but again does nothing to change the total. This article raises some interesting points that the Obama administration is "cherry-picking" whom it deports. For example, the article states: "ICE classifies illegal immigrants as criminal if they have been convicted of a crime, not including traffic offense, Vaughn noted." Actually, that's not true, for an illegal, I am pretty sure a traffic ticket is a criminal offense subject to removal. So this may point to where the Obama administration is prioritizing who it removes and who it lets slip by. But it is true to make this high removal rate the Obama administration is indeed cherry-picking the offenses it deports for as your article alludes to.

Still does not change the record and the total rate of removals which is the highest ever under Obama for the past 20 years and perhaps forever. Also, if you remember, before 1921, we basically let anyone in and did not really have "illegals" like we do today, by definition and by implementation.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

“This is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a predictable, orchestrated and contrived assault on the compassionate side of Americans by her political leaders that knowingly puts minor illegal alien children at risk for purely political purposes,”


Former border patrol officers.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

Man, you missed the rest of the best of those quotes by "the National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers."


“Yes, our leaders are guilty. However, we are responsible because it is the American voter [who] has placed untrustworthy people in positions of power and kept them there when they have clearly demonstrated that they have violated that public trust.

“These successful con artists are well dressed, attractive and charming,” the statement said.

The officers even questioned whether “this heartless criminal exploitation of Central American infants and children [will] finally awaken Americans to the ruse being foisted upon them by their government, the media and other interested parties.”

“Has America lost her ability to stand up against the tyrants and do what is right rather than what is easy? Obviously, this administration thinks you are as corrupt as they are and will vote them back into office or these young children would not be streaming into America to tug at your hearts and empty your heads of reason,” the statement said.

And yet anyone can be a member.......

Perhaps a less incendiary view: http://online.wsj.com/articles/migrant-surge-jams-border-1402876252

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

without borders we have no country,

we need to protect our borders, in order to have a nation

the president is charged with protecting the united states, Obama is not doing that and needs to go,

this is just one more scandal that will go into the articles of impeachment along with Benghazi, using the IRS to target political opponents, and the fast and furious gun running program, and the really bad bergdalh trade.

we've been riced for the last time by this administration.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

In addition to the U.S., most of the European countries and Australia are also plagued with significant illegal immigration. It's very hard to stop. Impossible, some say.


thanks MG

skippy skippy
Jun '14

"It's very hard to stop. Impossible, some say"

and yet we need to try and secure the borders better, finsih the fence, strengthen our policies and fewer will make the attempt.

we will never stop it completely, but we can tighten it up quite a bit. also tighten up the h1a visas. big business is not looking out for us as a nation, we need to tell them different.

arrest and prosecute employers who hire the illegal undocumented and make a big show of it,

implement the card check program, double check SS numbers etc.

a lot can be done that isn't being done.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

Since Obama has deported more illegals than any other President in history, define tighten up?

Maybe if the Republican side of Congress would get off their billydoots and finalized an immigration policy to finalize the status of our current illegal base these people couldn't be told "you can come to America and get amnesty if you get in now" It is their inaction that is fueling the surge.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

mistergoogle - YOU are part of the problem! If you can't see the pattern of destruction that Barack Obama has leashed upon America you are BLIND!

The Strategy being used here is called CLOWARD PIVEN! Look it up. I know you don't want to see your beloved DEMOCRAT PARTY thrown under the bus - but WAKE UP! John Kennedy was the LAST of the TRUE DEMOCRATS! but That party has been taken over almost entirely by Communist IslamoFaschists~! Their 'common goal' to take down American Capitalism justifies the means! The republican party is full of ELITISTS who are no better than the 'enemy' that has infiltrated the White House! The Muslim Brotherhood has a strong foothold in our government and we are about to see War World III break out in the MidEast and I have no doubt blood shed on our own soil! Do you think it is just women and children coming across our borders? Everyone better be ALERT! and get EDUCATED!!

***
The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul Alinsky:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

BARACK OBAMA HAS ACCOMPLISHED EVERYTHING HE SET OUT TO DO>>
FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM AMERICA!!

Sha44ss Sha44ss
Jun '14

Wow...he did all that while playing golf in Palm Springs...this guy is really good!

I think you need to add a little more aluminum foil to your hat.

yankeefan yankeefan
Jun '14

http://www.teaparty.org/obama-opens-borders-to-mexican-gang-members-2-44431/

Sha44ss Sha44ss
Jun '14

The pictures I have seen of "the children" are pre teen and teenage males. I haven't seen any pictures of babies or girls. If anyone can send a link to the pictures of these "children" I would like to see it. I am aware pre teen and teenagers or still children.

auntiel auntiel
Jun '14

"The pictures I have seen of "the children" are pre teen and teenage males."


When used in an emotional plea, "the children" typically include those up to the age of 25.

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jun '14

"Wow...he did all that while playing golf in Palm Springs...this guy is really good!"

yes , Obama has become the president that Nixon always wanted to be.

compared to Obama, Nixon is a piker.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

Explain "compared to Obama, Nixon is a piker."

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/06/17/arpaio-border-patrol-is-too-busy-changing-diapers-to-go-after-illegal-immigrants/

http://fusion.net/pimpcity

This is a human rights issue - people are dying - literally to get here. While I am a constitutional zealot - my heart bleeds for the children abandoned and made into slaves

skippy skippy
Jun '14

has our immigration policy gone completely south?

Perhaps no issue better illustrates the current divide between everyday citizens and our political and business elites than the issue of immigration. The latter group draws the financial gains from a generous labor supply without considering the perspective of those on the other side of the ledger: the working people who have to worry about being laid off and replaced with lower-wage workers, about the strain placed on their local hospitals and neighborhood resources, or about cartel violence spilling across the border into their own communities.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/06/22/Exclusive-Sen-Jeff-Session-Pro-Amnesty-Elites-Treat-People-as-Commodities

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

Lucy, you gots some splainin to do.

What about your explanation for: "compared to Obama, Nixon is a piker."

Cat got your tongue?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

In ANY other country if this was happening to them these illegals would be shot on the spot. But we limp-wristed Americans want to be nice and "welcoming to all," I say BS on that. We need to SECURE our borders, round up any illegal that committed a crime while here and get them out of our prisons and send them packing back home.

Stop with all the freebies and the "in-state" college tuition and English as a second language crap and start taking care of our own.

We are in debt, have a drug problem, there are millions of people unemployed and on food stamps and disability right here that we need to take care of.

All these illegals are costing us BILLIONS of dollars that we should be using to improve America and the lives of Americans. Period!

And, before all the "my grandparent were immigrants" loonies start on me - so were mine -- but they came here legally, learned the language and had to PROVE they had a sponsor here in the states, had employment secured and had to be held in confinement and sprayed with God knows what chemicals to make sure they had no diseases before they were allowed access.

there is NO COMPARISON, so don't even start on that!

Heidi Heidi
Jun '14

it's wrong to treat human beings as chattle isn't it ?

from the article linked above:


Pro-Amnesty Elites Treat People as 'Commodities'

Rupert Murdoch also recently argued for a dramatic expansion of the controversial H1B guest worker program. Murdoch writes that “there is a shortage of qualified American candidates,” to fill jobs in STEM fields like computer services and engineering. But the evidence shows the opposite: the US graduates approximately twice as many STEM-trained students each year as there are STEM jobs to fill. There is a large surplus of unemployed Americans with STEM degrees and yet, per the Economic Policy Institute, “the annual inflow of guestworkers amount to one-third to one-half of all new IT jobs holders.” As Rutgers Professor Hal Salzman poignantly asked, “Average wages in IT today are the same as they were when Bill Clinton was president well over a decade ago…if there is in fact a shortage, why doesn't that reflect in the market? Why don't wages go up?"

maybe our hearts can also bleed for the chronically unemployed here stateside? what do you think? my heart certainly bleeds for both

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

MG, isn't it really self explanatory? Obama and his administration are way more corrupt than Nixon. And Nixon had the decency to resign.

LV Mom
Jun '14

we have an unhealthy ammount of immigrants taking jobs that American do want. and the influx of non-citizens depresses wage scales, salaries are lower as a direct result of an open borders policy:

“the annual inflow of guestworkers amount to one-third to one-half of all new IT jobs holders.”

As Rutgers Professor Hal Salzman poignantly asked,

“Average wages in IT today are the same as they were when Bill Clinton was president well over a decade ago…if there is in fact a shortage, why doesn't that reflect in the market? Why don't wages go up?"

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

BD not sure if that is just IT salaries. DH's field is still working on salaries last 4 years. When they lay workers off they are hiring for half the salary then they were 4 years ago. (does that make sense?) A family cannot live on what they are offering a year. My son lives in NC. Makes a decent salary and cost of living is a bit lower but not much. He was offered a job in South Jersey with a promotion BUT the salary did not match to living in NJ! Between the rents, insurance and other living expenses he would not be able to pay it all with what they were offering. Its not a wonder they can't find anyone to take the job.

Christine Christine
Jun '14

Over run? Ya think! So is Hackettstown, Washington, Morristown, Dover etc. Then we wonder why I kids can't find a job.

Nancy G
Jun '14

Our kids cant find jobs because the employers are happy to hire an "illegal" for less pay then a American citizen will work for. Dont blame no jobs on the "illegals". Its the employers fault. I once worked for a company that hire "illegals" just for that reason and was told " I can hire 3 of them (his words) for what I pay you". I quit shortly afterwards because talk like that continued and to me, it was harassment.

botheredbyuu2 botheredbyuu2
Jun '14

Your so right Nancy,1500 get through everyday,and why is that?The real pistol is they can stay here,work and free load.When are citizens can't get jobs,and can't make ends meet,and have poor medical coverage.


funny i never lost a job to an illegal.

darwin darwin
Jun '14

Heidi: "All these illegals are costing us BILLIONS of dollars that we should be using to improve America and the lives of Americans. Period!"
No they're not.

LV Mom: don't you actually have to convict versus just accuse to be considered in Nixon's arena?

Over 40 people in Nixon's administration were convicted and incarcerated including his Vice President and numerous top aides. Three articles of impeachment had been passed by the judiciary committee against Nixon, a fourth was coming and it was certain impeachment for Nixon until he escaped through resignation. Only Ford's pardon saved Nixon himself from absolutely certain criminal proceedings at both the State and Federal level.

So what ya got against Obama; a bunch of accusations, no convictions, and no impeachment proceedings even. And at the legislative level, more Republicans arrested and convicted than Democrats. I think you have to at least get a tad closer to a conviction before you make the claim Obama is more corrupt than Nixon.

BUSTED.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

an increase in the labor force depresses wages,

allowing more illegals to stay here and opening up the the flood gates for H1B visa holders will enable employers to pay Americans even less than they do right now.

Christine's post is spot on to what is happening all across America.

our open borders policies are contributing to the downward pressure on wages.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

OK, we are mixing some apples and oranges.

First, most illegals get low paying jobs Americans wouldn't take. Sure we could boot them all out and then we would just pay more.

Second, the IT jobs, etc. are not being taken by illegals but by either outsourcing internationally or by foreign guest workers. Still an issue, but a different one. Here's an interesting view plus some recommendations: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-05-17-Multinationals-send-jobs-overseas_n.htm

One thing I never understood is why corporate America just doesn't offer "experienced" workers less. I mean there was a time where I would have been fine working for 75% of my salary. "Retired" experienced workers often have plenty of gas left and don't need benefits anymore, many already have them.

I wish corporate America would take advantage of these smart, savvy, lower cost resources. But I guess that would take imagination.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

MG, I don't need any convictions to know Obama and his administration are the most corrupt in history. Any convictions at this point will not undo the damage he's done anyway.

LV Mom
Jun '14

Keep hiring the day workers, and they just keep coming.15 million people not paying taxes,so who is? Me and you !


Lobo You're kidding right I was in the construction business for over 30 years. And can count on one hand how many American day laborers worked more than a day or two and stayed. And I paid a decent wage to day laborers because that's how I started. And I could count on one hand how many foreign day laborers I hired ever quit. They could always be counted on to give you a good days work for a good days pay. The reason why companies like I had and other like it hire foreign laborers they're not worried about when there coffee break is when you tell them it's time to get back to work they go they don't bitch about the guy running a bulldozer making four times as much as them they do their work and cause no problems. I still have friends in the business that will only hire foreign day labelers Americans have this sense of entitlement that foreign people don't. In my experience There is no job that a foreign day labelers think is beneath them to do I have fired more than one American labor who told me that they are not going to do a particular job and to get the foreigners to do it

oldred
Jun '14

"MG, I don't need any convictions to know Obama and his administration are the most corrupt in history. Any convictions at this point will not undo the damage he's done anyway."

I didn't expect facts to change your mind.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

more low wage workers flooding the job market will keep depressing wages.

we need to protect our borders for the health of our nation.

with open borders, do we even have a nation?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

oldred,you just don't get it !


"I didn't expect facts to change your mind."

Facts rarely do, for many of us. Confirmation bias is far more important to the human brain than facts, as is the ability to ignore that which we don't want to hear.

justintime justintime
Jun '14

Oh JIT, I just don't believe you :>)

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-list-of-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-for-2013/

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2013

President Barack Obama actually tops this “Top Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” list for 2013 as the driving force behind so many of the misdeeds. This is Obama’s seventh straight year on the list, dating back all the way to 2007 (in 2006, he earned a “Dishonorable Mention”). He is a master at catch-me-if-you-can, corrupt politics. This year, he has again acted as a one-man Congress, rewriting entire sections of federal law on his own. Not only is his administration secretive and dishonest; its callous disregard for the rule of law undermines our constitutional republic. Examples include:

LV Mom
Jun '14

So, in other words, oldred, you and your friends prefer to over-work and under-pay illegals rather than have to adhere to the same rules other employers are forced to uphold.

LV Mom
Jun '14

LVMom, good catch,this is why we have problems !


We never lost jobs to illegals and my kids Never have a problem getting summer jobs.

Once again I ask the question how do you know they are illegal?

Christine Christine
Jun '14

New Jersey 293,720 - number of jobs encumbered by illegal alien workers

http://www.fairus.org/issue/illegal-aliens-taking-u-s-jobs

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Judicial Watch is accused of conservative bias in it's rankings picking 9 out of 10 democrats this year. The comeback is that the party in power will always rank higher because of ownership. Well, does it?

2007 --- 40% Republicans, 2 were convicted so kinda a slam dunk on those
2006 --- 50% Republican, 3 convicted
2008 --- 40%, 2009, --- 10%, 2010 --- 20%

Guess not.

Judicial Watch is actually a right-wing funded litigious organization which garners funding by using the legal system to wreak havoc amongst liberal politicians. It makes it's donation money by going to court.

So, I applaud them on the facts, laugh at them for the errors and innuendo they have done, and note that hey seem biased unless you believe Dems are more corrupt than Repubs. At best, I call that possibility a tie but Judicial watch consistently sides with the Repubs. Why? Because it's funded by the right wing. Also, they pride themselves on litigation but given their statements on Obama, have not litigated on any of them against him personally. Wimps.

But let's take one claim: Obama family trips at our expense are most egregious. not exactly BUSTED unless you put it in perspective.........
http://www.factcheck.org/2011/07/the-traveling-president/
http://www.ntu.org/governmentbytes/7-9-13-first-lady-international-flights-vacations.html

Perhaps we should give every President and their family a time out during their term and ground them to the White House and limo trips otherwise get off it and admit Obama and family are better than your guy.

And another: "This year, he has again acted as a one-man Congress, rewriting entire sections of federal law on his own." Well, they lay this out there like an egg on the sidewalk in the hot sun to fry. First, there's the ObamaCare changes and has he "faithfully" implemented the law as the Constitution demands. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/07/the-white-house-keeps-changing-obamacare-is-that-legal/ Apparently yes to the point that no one has made a case.

The second area of complaint is executive orders and while we can talk quality, in quantity Obama is a piker. Thus far, he has 182.

Bush - 291
Clinton - 364
Bush - 166 one term
Reagan - 381

Again, I say get over it unless you believe that no President should tweak laws within the bounds of the Constitutional ambiguities and no President should issue any executive orders where again, Obama is better than your guy.

So on this one I say a partial BUSTED because it's unclear whether he is within the law or not on ObamaCare. The only thing again I can say is that if his opposition could tag him, they would. And on the executive orders, god bless, at least someone in Washington is doing something because Congress couldn't wipe it's collective a$$ with the laws it has passed. Not enough paper.

So --- Judicial Watch seems more hot air than hot news IMHO and likes to fan the flames because that's how they make their salaries and bonuses.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

as a constitutionalist - I never knocked Obama on his secret service costs etc. that's not his choice - it comes with the position and is comparable to other CEO travel

skippy skippy
Jun '14

LV Mom: "damn the facts, full speed ahead!"

Gadfly Gadfly
Jun '14

nixon is a piker compared to obama; Obama has become the president that nixion always aspired to be.

btw ; What did the president know and when did he know it?

IRS scandal? ('What did the president know and when did he know it?')

Bengazhi? ('What did the president know and when did he know it?')

Fast and Furious? ('What did the president know and when did he know it?')

Obamacare? ('What did the president know and when did he know it?')

Open borders policy? ('What did the president know and when did he know it?')

why is the press not asking these questions?

Why?

Machiavellian and lawless, this president goes on full steam ahead because he is co-enabled by a complicit corrupt liberal press machine.

if it was a republican administration these stories would be big news in the MSM. but since obama is their guy, they give him a free pass on all of it. they keep grading him on a curve because they are heavily invested in seeing that this president is a success. the libs in the press can't/won't permit any criticism of him, somehow it's not PC to hold this president to the same standards as other presidents. Wow!

pathetic, just pathetic.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

So sorry for your problems BDog..... Yes, you are spot on. Conservatives are a helpless, hapless, hopeless bunch unable to use the press or the courts to their advantage. They know Obama is corrupt but they just can't get anyone important to listen. The entire system is against them, the deck is stacked. They know Obama has personally pulled the trigger or has knowledge well before the fact, and if only someone important would listen, they could prove it. If only the right people would ask the right questions in the right way at the right time, but let's face it, the conservatives just can't get it done. They are ineffective, inefficient, and useless.

Yeah, let's put these people in power.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

Latest conspiracy theory from the Republicans

Someone in the White House is organizing buses in Central American countries to bring all those children to the United States so they can become citizens and vote Democratic in the 2024 presidential election

oldred
Jun '14

Hay . BrotherDog
maybe it's the same reason why the conservative media has never criticized the Bush administration was getting nearly 5000 American soldiers killed and tens of thousands wounded by lieing to the American public. or maybe it's the same reason why the Bush administration torture captives and the conservative media never criticized it. Yes how soon we forget that

oldred
Jun '14

The majority of our nation now has their hands out looking for entitlements. Why take the blinders off when you don't think you're being affected?

LV Mom
Jun '14

http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/06/27/report-mexican-military-chopper-crosses-into-us-shoots-at-border-agents/

apparently the Mexican military elected to shoot at the border patrol

skippy skippy
Jun '14

Seems like a good percentage of conservatives are living in a fantasy alternate reality constructed by the likes of the Koch brothers, extreme "alternative news" websites, and the talking heads on Fox Noise. It's a little scary, especially when we hear them talk more and more frequently about an armed revolt.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jun '14

JIT said

"Confirmation bias is far more important to the human brain than facts, as is the ability to ignore that which we don't want to hear."

I have really seen and learned that to be VERY true in the last few years, and not in just political issues.

JeffersonRepub JeffersonRepub
Jun '14

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/brittany-m-hughes/dream-act-i-saw-it-sure-doesnt-look-ellis-island

skippy skippy
Jun '14

I share your concern, Gadfly. If at the very least most people share the same reality, then arguments as to what are the best policies can be made intelligently, and compromises and good governance are possible.

But once we have differing realities as a starting point, we can't really even talk to each other and have it make any sense.

JIT/JR, I agree also, the statement about confirmation bias. I catch myself doing it sometimes, and work to stop it.


Regarding the Southern border, I'm under the impression that the current problem in the news is not that there is an overall increase ("overrun"?), but that the young people entering currently from Central America are turning themselves in as soon as they cross, meaning we suddenly have to put them all somewhere while they are processed in the normal way, for unaccompanied minors.

It's a problem, I agree.


oldred - you're right, it's wrong, and i haven't forgotten.

tell me why the MSM keeps grading this president on a curve?

supreme court decision yesterday (9-0 unanimous) that Obama behaved unconstitutionally.

the SCOTUS said that the president does not have the power to decide if congress is in session or not in session, and the recess appointments Obama made while congress was in session are all unconstitutional. Now tell me oldred, who's fault was that?

Machiavellian and lawless, President Obama makes Nixon look like a piker,

Obama has truly become the kind of president that Nixon always wanted to be,

and the MSM is letting him get away with it Scot free,

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

things are spiraling out of control at the border:

Report: Mexican Military Chopper Crosses Into US, Shoots At Border Agents

TUCSON, Ariz. (CBS Las Vegas/AP) — Border Patrol agents in Arizona were reportedly fired upon by a Mexican military helicopter that traveled across the border.

http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2014/06/27/report-mexican-military-chopper-crosses-into-us-shoots-at-border-agents/

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

I wonder why so many thousands of "parents" are letting their children cross the border alone. They don't want them? Are they selling them? I would like to know the reason. Most of the civilized world (and the animal world) do not let their children cross borders into foreign countries all alone. Who does things like this? Anyone in their right mind would not do this without some sort of a "guarantee safety" of their child. It's not human nature.

auntiel auntiel
Jun '14

I don't think it's much different than generations ago Europeans sent their kids on ships bound for America. Some families are desperate for their kids to have a better life than they had. My grandfather was 11 when he parents sent him on a ship from Italy in 1917.

Darwin Darwin
Jun '14

auntiel, I believe many of them have one or both parents, or other relatives, already here. Or, in the case of older teenagers, they basically are young adults, or maybe are facing death from gangs at home. A variety of situations, probably.


Re: US Southern Border being over run?

BDog, Making Nixon look like a piker. Not even close. You need to read the entire story....again. "supreme court decision yesterday (9-0 unanimous) that Obama behaved unconstitutionally. the SCOTUS said that the president does not have the power to decide if congress is in session or not in session, and the recess appointments Obama made while congress was in session are all unconstitutional. Now tell me oldred, who's fault was that?"

Answer -- Just about every President. And more often in recent history. And only three of Obama's about 40 recess appointments were struck down, the others stick.

Narrowly speaking you are right, he behaved unconstitutionally in making three specific appointments on a three-day Congressional break. He can still make appointments during recess, just needs a ten-day break. Plus, appointments are not only restricted to vacancies occurring during a recess, they can happen anytime. Now Congress can hold pro-forma session to thwart appointments during the 10-day recess if they so choose.

However right now this is all moot since the Senate in November invoked the nuclear option for a simple majority for appointee approval; Obama don't need the stinkin recess appointments anymore.

Yes, Obama was caught but in actuality the Presidency is the real culprit with Reagan's 240 recess appointments, Bush made 77, Clinton at 139 recess appointments, the other Bush made 171 recess appointments, and Obama, around 40. All of these Presidents violated the Constitution in some of their recess appointments.

Why did Obama do this? Look at the chart. This less-than-do-nothing Congress is stopping any progress, any change, anything in Washington. What could any President do except "roll their own?" Look at the chart. And you are complaining about Obama getting something done?

And the MSM had many stories on the topic; did you expect condemnation for this? Or Congress?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

Auntiel - Because our borders are wide open -

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2014/06/27/undocumented-immigrant-children-spurred-by-reuniting-with-families-not-just/


its really a humanitarian issue - in any regard - if parents are willing to separate from their children things are horrible - wish I had a solution.

skippy skippy
Jun '14

the SCOTUS voted unanimously that the president violated the constitution of the united states. that sets Barrak Hussein Obama apart from the other guys.

Obama broke the law and got caught this time. (there are more things coming down the pike for him, stay tuned)

More will be coming for our president who flaunts the law whenever he feels like it. He seems to care not for the rule of law. (tell me again that he's the smartest guy in the room, sure hasn't shown it lately. the blinders are starting to come off of many democrats, they are starting to ask questions.).

when will Eric Holder be impeached for refusing to appoint a special prosecuter in the IRS scandal? When will the 80% liberal MSM ask the question:

"What did the President know and when did he know it?"

Machiavellian and Nixonian, our president Barrak Hussein Obama just pushes on with his personal agenda.

open borders, causing mayhem for our border states, why?

IRS - BHO's administration has weaponized the IRS to attack his political opponents.

on the IRS scandal when will the MSM ask "What did the President know and when did he know it?"

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jun '14

The Supreme Court ruled 9 to 0 and the President,( a Consitutional Lawyer from Harvard) said they are wrong.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jun '14

If you cross the United States border illegally in 2014 you get;
1 – A job
2 – A driver’s license
3 – A Social Security card
4 – Welfare
5 – Food stamps
6 – Credit cards
7 – Subsidized rent or a loan to buy a house
8 – Free education
9 – Free health care
10 – A lobbyist in Washington
11 – Billions of dollars in public documents printed in your language
12 – Millions of servicemen and women who are willing to – and do – die
for your right to the ways and means of our Constitution
13 – And the right to carry the flag of your country – the one you walked
out on – while you call America racist and protest that you don’t get
enough respect.

If you however cross the mexican border by mistake you go to jail.

I am sick of this government that won't do the job to protect our borders and our citizens !! We need to have a national DEPORTATION DAY and even if we had one every month for years we would still be in shambles !

Ashley Cole
Jun '14

I've seen that list before. There's some truth to it - 10% maybe?


10% ???? Do you think it is 1985 again or something ?? Wake up !!

Ashley Cole
Jun '14

Gee Ashley, don't let facts get into the way of your fear and loathing.

You are way wrong on many accounts, but your hatred has no doubt stopped you from actually reading on the topic.

Much of the data refuting your allegations might be listed above, certainly in other posts, but here's some things to think about:

illegal aliens probably pay more in taxes than what they illegally receive in benefits; they have no legal tax benefits. The numbers have been posted before.

illegal aliens pay social security but the vast majority never collect. The input is large enough that it is floating your benefits. The numbers have been posted before.

the illegal aliens that steal SSNs to fraudulently collect steal less than legal citizens like yourself steal from business under fraud. The numbers....never mind.

Yes, there are issues, especially now with the influx of children and young adults. Yes, it would be nice to magically seal the boarder without going broke, but if we magically removed all illegal aliens from the US overnight our economy would suffer greatly immediately.

It's just not as simple as you would like it and certainly the facts show it is not the way you portray it.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

Its quite simple. The Goverment has an Army to protect us as the Constitution says it should. They have not done there job for a long time and we are being invaded. Start their.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jun '14

Sorry, they were busy in Iraq and Afghanistan.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

Dear mistergoogle,

With a name like Ashley Cole (an English football - soccer - player) and a 10% hit rate on actual facts I propose that we have troll. What do you think?


Illegal Aliens,, should not be here,because its not legal! Unless you think its 10% legal,you realize illegal is braking the law.Now could you ,be illegal in any other country and live like they do here? You would be in jail,or worse.Who are you defending,you have facts,so what,they are illegal period.Do you get it!


"Give me your tired, your poor,
your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.
The wretched refuse of you teaming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

yankeefan yankeefan
Jun '14

right off the bat i know #3, #6, and #7 are not true. #1 is true is only a couple states, so it's mostly false.

it must be nice to go thru life blindly believing everything you read on the internet without havign to actually fact check it.

darwin darwin
Jun '14

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/06/17/Illegal-Immigrants-Treated-Better-Than-Homeless-in-US

The treatment and services being provided to the youthful immigrants brings to question the attention, or lack thereof, being given to our own homeless and starving populations. That is not to say that welfare programs, many of which are already bloated, should be further expanded for U.S. citizens. Rather, it calls into question the Obama Administration's priorities--are illegal immigrants a higher priority for this administration than struggling U.S. citizens?
According to the most recent Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, in 2013 there were about 610,000 homeless individuals in the United States, 215,344 of them living unsheltered. Nearly one-quarter of all homeless people were children.
One in 45 U.S. children experience homelessness each year. Many cities--primarily those in California, New York, Texas and Florida--have actually seen a recent increase in child homelessness. But the Obama Administration has not addressed this issue. Rather, it has been almost entirely focused on acting in the best interest of the migrants in the U.S. illegally.

LV Mom
Jun '14

"If you however cross the mexican border by mistake you go to jail." Ashley Cole


And you can be sure this president will do nothing, even if you are a Marine..Hey, you broke their laws...
His mission is to destroy the United States, and he is succeeding.

LV Mom
Jun '14

"Its quite simple. The Goverment has an Army to protect us as the Constitution says it should. They have not done there job for a long time and we are being invaded. Start their." old gent

I would think our own border would be at the top of the list right now.

LV Mom
Jun '14

The Posse Comitatus Act limits what our military can be use for at the border, (Support role of US Border Patrol and other local law enforcement agencies).

Nancy Nancy
Jun '14

LVMom,you said all, this open arms policy, has caused nothing but trouble for our country,but they get a lot of votes,and sometimes the illegals have three or four names,and social security cards,so you can see why the Liberals look the other way.Some of these posters are in a round room, looking for a corner!


Nancy, I was not aware of that. It seems it's not being followed or under review now. Maybe Bush's Patriot act changed it.

http://wordinfo.info/unit/2997/s:posse

Old Gent Old Gent
Jun '14

Illegals don't and can't vote... stop trying to use that as an excuse when a Democrat wins an election.

darwin darwin
Jun '14

Darwin - maybe you should follow your own advice and read up on the facts

#1 - Undocumented workers can't get jobs? What world do you live in? Even our government hires them.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/05/11/Chicago-Mayor-Emanuel-Announces-City-Jobs-Internships-Will-Go-to-Illegal-Aliens

#3. http://seniorsleague.org/2012/how-undocumented-workers-are-becoming-entitled-to-social-security/

#6. http://www.snopes.com/politics/immigration/bankofamerica.asp

#7. The FDIC along with the Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. have given their endorsement for banks across the U.S. to offer home loans and other financial services such as car loans to illegal aliens regardless of their immigration status. In doing so, banks are accepting the Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN) from the Internal Revenue Service in lieu of a Social Security card for which those illegally in the U.S. do not qualify. Wells Fargo and Bank of America have also been accepting the matricula consular card or consul registration number for nearly two years, which can be sought at the Mexican Consulate in the U.S. instead of an ITIN.

"Fannie Mae Announcement SEL-2010-01: * Verification that all borrowers have a valid and accurate Social Security number OR Individual Taxpayer Identification Number

"These loans, known as ITIN loans, are offered to illegal immigrants that do not have a Social Security number. They can qualify for the loans by obtaining an Individual Taxpayer Identification number (ITIN) from the Internal Revenue Service. A few small banks, as well as national banks Citibank and Wells Fargo, have started to issue loans to customers who have an ITIN but not a Social Security number"

"Banks are not an arm of the immigration department," says Kevin Mukri, a spokesperson for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the primary bank regulator. "As long as those getting mortgages meet the requirements of being authorized bank customers, including proper ID, it would be discriminatory not to service them." There is no law against banks issuing mortgages to illegal immigrants, nor against their owning property in the U.S"

In addition -

#2. http://cir.ca/news/states-allow-drivers-licenses-for-immigrants

#4&5. http://cis.org/immigrant-welfare-use-2011

You know #8 -13 are true.

And even thought legally undocumented residents of this country can't vote why would you think they don't vote? They've already broken several laws - now they are going to follow the law?


Yahoo News

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is asking Congress for increased powers to send unaccompanied children from Central America back to their home countries from the U.S. border they tried to cross illegally, setting up a confrontation with immigration activists.
Obama to seek funds to stem border influx AFP
In a letter to congressional leaders Monday, Obama also is asking for increased penalties for persons who smuggle immigrants who are vulnerable, such as children. The request is part of a broader administration response to what the White House has called a "humanitarian crisis" on the border.

Obama is asking Congress for emergency money that would, among other things, help conduct "an aggressive deterrence strategy focused on the removal and repatriation of recent border crossers."

Obama's letter to House Speaker John Boehner, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell says the administration is confronting the influx with a coordinated response on both sides of the border.

"This includes fulfilling our legal and moral obligation to make sure we appropriately care for unaccompanied children who are apprehended, while taking aggressive steps to surge resources to our Southwest border to deter both adults and children from this dangerous journey, increase capacity for enforcement and removal proceedings, and quickly return unlawful migrants to their home countries," Obama wrote.

The Border Patrol in South Texas has been overwhelmed for several months by an influx of unaccompanied children and parents traveling with young children from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador. Unlike Mexican immigrants arrested after entering the U.S. illegally, those from Central America cannot be as easily returned to their countries. Obama is seeking authority to act more quickly.
The Border Patrol has apprehended more than 52,000 child immigrants traveling on their own since the start of the 2014 budget year in October.

Immigrant advocacy groups, already frustrated by Obama's lack of executive action to ease record levels of deportations, immediately pounced on the administration's decision.

"President Obama is asking Congress to change the law to enable the government to inflict expedited removal on unaccompanied children. That is simply unconscionable," said Leslie A. Holman, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association ."No matter what you call it, rapid deportations without any meaningful hearing for children who are rightly afraid of the violence and turmoil from which they fled is wrong, and contradicts the fundamental values of this nation."
Obama's attempt to speed up deportations of the Central American immigrants comes as immigration advocates have been pressing the administration to take steps to slow deportations in the face of congressional inaction on comprehensive immigration legislation.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jun '14

Darn Old Gent, he's ruining our country again. First he deports more illegals than any other President, now he's trying to send the kids back. More ruination of the nation.

I think the last sentence in your story said it best: "in the face of congressional inaction on comprehensive immigration legislation." Our southern neighbors looking for a better life, wishing that they might get amnesty, especially the children, and not getting any clear signs from Congress, the influx has increased, especially the children. But Congress between anything-but-Obama, just-say-no-to-Obama, we-don't-work-here-no-more, and the fear that positive immigration reform (or any new legislation) might improve the country and affect their next election, the Congressional anti-Obamaites will not move forward on the issue.

When Cantor stop up and said "let's take some action," they voted him out of office.

Just watch, they will refuse funding for increased deportation and LV Mom will blame Obama again.

"Word has spread to the Americas and beyond that the Obama administration has taken unprecedented and most likely unconstitutional steps to shut down the enforcement of our immigration laws,” Representative Robert W. Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said at a hearing. “It seems that Obama fiddles while our borders implode.” NY Times, June 28th

Mr. Goodlatte said he would work with the White House to strengthen the administration’s enforcement powers."

Then after thinking about it at a Tea Party......."The response from some Republicans was not favorable either. Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, accused Obama of seeking a "blank check" with no real solutions. "President Obama created this disaster at our southern border and now he is asking American taxpayers to foot the bill," said Goodlatte." Newsday, June 30.

"A senior White House official says House Speaker John Boehner has told President Barack Obama the House of Representatives won’t vote on an immigration overhaul this year" CBS

And the Republican Congressional Work stoppage continues and they don't even need a Union to go on strike.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

Obama created this mess and like a typical lib is now looking for more money to fix it. (of course, it won't be fixed at all)

Our borders need to be secured, by any means necessary, before any other action should be taken. The law, the constitution, the elected officials also voted into office, BO is above it all, in his opinion.

Secure the borders, period.

LV Mom
Jun '14

How do you suggest securing the borders without spending $? Any means necessary?

darwin darwin
Jun '14

I think she likes him Mikey.

But it let's me understand why her elected officials can't get anything done.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

For decades, the governments of Mexico, El Salvador, & Guatemala, among others, have intentionally displaced their poor on to US tax payers and social services. Then, they reap a windfall of $Billions sent back in untaxed remittances annually. So, there is little incentive for the kleptocracies in those countries to fly straight and take care of their people. They would rather steal and let the poor flock to the US.

US Citizens have absorbed the largest immigration tsunami in world history. It is the US Citizenry that deserves amnesty from mass immigration and we should not be forced to subsidize the corruption and incompetence of foreign governments forever.

At a certain point, foreign governments must step up to the 21st century and take care of their people. It is the Mexican government that failed your parents, NOT US citizens.

Ashley Cole
Jun '14

Darwin,

All that stuff is true. These people know what to do and how to do it before they even get here ? You are the one that needs to get your facts straight ! They have many ways to get fake and false social security numbers . I guess you are just too naive and maybe should come out from the rock you are hiding under. I know illegals who are here from many different countries personally because i am in a few different blue collar businesses. You probably have never even spoken to one because you are too scared to come out from wherever you are hiding.

Ashley Cole
Jun '14

Darwin. Just call it a Border War and keep the press's running like we have been doing. No one seems to care.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jun '14

"Then, they reap a windfall of $Billions sent back in untaxed remittances annually"

My goodness you are not only misinformed but numerical challenged. This is so blatantly wrong that's it not worth getting the right number for you.

1. Billions? Not bloody likely. And you don't have a clue, do you?
2. They are taxed, they just don't get all the entitlements. Probably pay more taxes than you do.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

"Then, they reap a windfall of $Billions sent back in untaxed remittances annually"

My goodness you are not only misinformed but numerical challenged. This is so blatantly wrong that's it not worth getting the right number for you.

1. Billions? Not bloody likely. And you don't have a clue, do you?
2. They are taxed, they just don't get all the entitlements. Probably pay more taxes than you do.

For decades no less.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jun '14

Sorry BLD that should have read #2 not #1. #6&7 are not true. Her statement was " in 2014..." So your article about 2007 doesn't hold up today.

Darwin Darwin
Jun '14

It's pretty surprising Darwin that you say you are a financial advisor yet you don't even know about Foreign National Mortgage Loans. Many illegal residents, especially in areas with high immigrant populations get mortgages this way. The Snopes article was updated in 2010 and the information is still accurate today. In addition, Oakland, CA began offering debit cards to illegal immigrants last year in a program that has been copied in other cities with large immigrant populations.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/26/undocumented-immigrant-debit-cards_n_2769198.html

And as I proved to you #2 is true.


Shoot first, ask no questions later.

Really?
Jul '14

Lets see, if you sent 15 million illegals back,how much would there be in personal saving to each legal citizen.You would find the numbers staggering ! We are forgetting how many 3rd world people are coming through our borders,they know its simple,so close the borders !


Will we let ourselves be destroyed in our turn without a struggle, give up our homes, our country bequeathed to us by the Great Spirit, the graves of our dead and everything that is dear and sacred to us? I know you will cry with me, 'Never! Never!'

LeRoy Grimace LeRoy Grimace
Jul '14

OK, I really didn't think we needed to do this again but 4&5 --- Welfare and Food Stamps.

First, no one really knows. Second, the Center for Immigration Studies is a "non-partisan" right-wing group that desires NO immigration and starts from there. Generally, their numbers are OK, but when a SWAG is called for, they lean towards their goal. And then they build on a scary stereotypical illegal alien image to scare us using some blatantly obvious data tricks.

Basically what they say when you get rid of the garbage is: For 2009, 57% of immigrant households (legal and illegal) with children (under 18) used at least one welfare program, compared to 39% for native. You see the first red flag on legal and illegal parenthetical meaning the data has less relevance as a beacon into illegal status. There's a mix here and they don't even quantify the mix in the summary so "warning, warning Will Robinson." So to use this data to tell us that illegal aliens are welfare robbing us blind is misleading at minimum. The rest of the their story builds on this shaky foundation adding bad mortar in each course of their "data" bricks.

Then CIS estimates that 52% of legal immigrant households with children used at least one welfare program in 2009, 71% for illegal immigrant households with children. OK, first, it's an estimate so here comes the SWAG. Second it's build on top of the legal/illegal mix where you don't even know the sample size of illegals. And then they add that illegal immigrants generally receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children which, I think, according to our laws is legal. So there is no fraud. But there's lots of numbers and it does sound scary.

Then they take the SWAG estimate and further extract that illegal immigrant households with children primarily use food assistance and Medicaid, making almost no use of cash or housing assistance. Hopefully the reader will remember that they are using this for US-born children which, I think, according to our laws is legal..

And then to toss you a quasi-racist bone they add "High welfare use by immigrant-headed households with children is partly explained by the low education level of many immigrants." Well, no duh. First remember it's a SWAG, second it's for US-born children, third ---- most white people on welfare have a low education level too dufus. Probably have more cavities than you and me too.

And building on that stereotype they add: "An unwillingness to work is not the reason immigrant welfare use is high. The vast majority (95 percent) of immigrant households with children had at least one worker in 2009. But their low education levels mean that more than half of these working immigrant households with children still accessed the welfare system during 2009." As does 50% of every fast food worker in America, white, black, native, and legal immigrant. And again, this is for their US-born children.

So what have we learned. That immigrants, an unknown quantity being illegal, use welfare but only for their US-born children. And people on welfare typically are less educated.

Well, that was illuminating.

Perhaps a more scientific view might help: http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/cost-of-illegal-immigrants/

Bottom line --- modest use, modest fraud, modest cost.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

BLD, foreign national mortgages are for non resident aliens or permanent aliens. Which means it is for aliens that are here LEGALLY!! Illegals can not get these types of loans. You have to be heavily documented with most illegals are undocumented.

http://www.foreignnationalmortgages.com
http://library.hsh.com/articles/government-programs/fha-foreign-national-loans/

Once again there is a difference between being a non US citizen and being an illegal alien.

And like I said #2 is only true in a handful of states

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

The real threat to this countries security are not muslim terrorists, but illegals coming from our southern borders. The implications from these illegals will have a longer term effect on our countries security than any muslim terrorists. At least you can kill terrorists, but illegals get treated to all the benefits of a citizen at taxpayers expense.


Ah, Darwin, but they're all Latinos so WTH.......

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

"Lets see, if you sent 15 million illegals back,how much would there be in personal saving to each legal citizen"

Immigration and Customs Enforcement says it costs about $12,500 to deport an illegal immigrant. But other credible estimates put the cost as high as $23,480 per. So, a 5-year deportation program could cost in the neighborhood of $285 billion - or about $922 for every legal man, woman, and child in the U.S. Remember, you have to find them and that's way harder and costly than you think it is. Then there are legal proceeding. Finally you have the cost to transport them back to their origin.

Now, if you'd care to list the savings after they are gone then we can see how much of that expense will be offset.


OMG, it's the NYT.... "There are many ways to debate immigration, but when it comes to economics, there isn’t much of a debate at all. Nearly all economists, of all political persuasions, agree that immigrants — those here legally or not — benefit the overall economy."

"Stephen Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration, told me that undocumented workers contribute about $15 billion a year to Social Security through payroll taxes. They only take out $1 billion (very few undocumented workers are eligible to receive benefits). Over the years, undocumented workers have contributed up to $300 billion, or nearly 10 percent, of the $2.7 trillion Social Security Trust Fund." They are actually floating SS right now.

Not that there aren't economic issues on a local basis: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

From yet another leftist org:

"but a range of studies find that immigrants pay between $90 and $140 billion a year in federal, state, and local taxes"

"In one estimate, immigrants earn about $240 billion a year, pay about $90 billion a year in taxes, and use about $5 billion in public benefits. In another cut of the data, immigrant tax payments total $20 to $30 billion more than the amount of government services they use"

http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/high-school/top-10-myths-about-immigration

This does not mean we should not secure our boarders. However, the thought of deporting everyone here illegally is an economic no-go. We need to rapidly protect our boarders better but have a solid plan for those here as well as better enforcement for anyone illegal in the future. Yes, we need to say no more but we also need to deal with what is and just saying no and sending them home would do more economic harm than good.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

You just close the border,point in the other direction, and say leave! After enough get the idea, they will go some place else.No more money, no more legal crap, only citizens deserve the benefits.We stop plants from coming in, fruit,because they say go back,right now.I have been on the border,you have never seen such a mess.If you don't think Muslim Terrorist cell are coming in,you need to get out more! Here is a simple way for these groups to attack all at once. Go to a gas station,who runs it, third world people,they are on the cell phone,if one of them simple says light your gas station on fire,and they all do, America is on fire! To simple,think about it, quit looking for the planes,and trucks,they do not need guns,how many gas stations across this country,that's a lot of damage,


I guess you are just too naive and maybe should come out from the rock you are hiding under. I know illegals who are here from many different countries personally because i am in a few different blue collar businesses. You probably have never even spoken to one because you are too scared to come out from wherever you are hiding.


wow how did i miss this post???

i never realized i was hiding

darwin darwin
Jul '14

From 2013, I'm sure the numbers are much worse today.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/05/the-fiscal-cost-of-unlawful-immigrants-and-amnesty%20to-the-us-taxpayer

The Fiscal Cost of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S. Taxpayer

In 2010, the average unlawful immigrant household received around $24,721 in government benefits and services while paying some $10,334 in taxes. This generated an average annual fiscal deficit (benefits received minus taxes paid) of around $14,387 per household. This cost had to be borne by U.S. taxpayers. Amnesty would provide unlawful households with access to over 80 means-tested welfare programs, Obamacare, Social Security, and Medicare. The fiscal deficit for each household would soar.

Conclusion
The United States offers enormous economic opportunities and societal benefits. Countless more people would immigrate to the U.S. if they had the opportunity. Given this context, the U.S. must be selective in its immigration policy. Policymakers must ensure that the interaction of welfare and other financial transfer programs with immigration does not expand the fiscally dependent population, thereby imposing large costs on American society.
Current immigration policies with respect to both lawful and unlawful immigration encourage the entry of a disproportionate number of poorly educated immigrants into the U.S. As these low-skill immigrants (both lawful and unlawful) take up residence, they impose a substantial tax burden on U.S. taxpayers. The benefits received by unlawful and low-skill immigrant households exceed taxes paid at each age level; *******at no point do these households pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits.********
Current immigration practices, both lawful and unlawful, operate like a system of transnational welfare outreach, bringing millions of fiscally dependent individuals into the U.S. This policy needs to be changed. U.S. immigration policy should encourage high-skill immigration and strictly limit low-skill immigration. In general, government policy should limit immigration to those who will be net fiscal contributors, avoiding those who will increase poverty and impose new costs on overburdened U.S. taxpayers.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Mistergoogle,

You are the one numerically challenged ! Why don't you go try to save some more pennies off your shop rite bill ! That was the most pathetic post i have ever seen on this site !! lol You also probably believe that there is only 11 or 12 million illegals here like our gov't says ?? You can't believe everything you see and hear especially in today's world !!

Ashley Cole
Jul '14

Thanks Ashley, sorry to refute most of what you have said with facts. Guess facts just ain't your friends.

LVMom, yeah the HO routinely makes the same mistake that CIS makes by putting apples in with the oranges but telling you it's all one number.

"In a 2007 study, Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington, found that families with low-skilled immigrants cost taxpayers about $30,130 in 2004. Those households paid about $10,573 in taxes for 2004.

But that study includes all low-skilled, immigrant households in America, representing 15.9-million people. About 60 percent were entirely legal households, and 40 percent had undocumented workers. Tancredo's statement is about undocumented workers only, so this study is off point." Politifact

So basically it includes mostly legal immigrants who pay taxes and legally are entitled to benefits just like you. But they make it sound like the alien invasion is stealing us blind. Sorry, it's not. But yes, poor Americans, even legal immigrants use welfare and other programs.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Not apples and oranges at all. We have to stop granting amnesty to uneducated, low skilled immigrants who simply cross our borders.

"Current immigration practices, both lawful and unlawful, operate like a system of transnational welfare outreach, bringing millions of fiscally dependent individuals into the U.S. This policy needs to be changed. U.S. immigration policy should encourage high-skill immigration and strictly limit low-skill immigration. In general, government policy should limit immigration to those who will be net fiscal contributors, avoiding those who will increase poverty and impose new costs on overburdened U.S. taxpayers."

LV Mom
Jul '14

"Go to a gas station,who runs it, third world people,they are on the cell phone,if one of them simple says light your gas station on fire,and they all do, America is on fire! To simple,think about it, quit looking for the planes,and trucks,they do not need guns,how many gas stations across this country,that's a lot of damage"


wait now all gas station employees are terriosts??? Man i have been hiding from all the illegal hispanics all this time i never knew that about all the gas station workers. WE'RE SCREWED!!

darwin darwin
Jul '14

" We have to stop granting amnesty to uneducated, low skilled immigrants who simply cross our borders."

When did we start?

And why? Do you need a job?

Ah, Darwin, but they're all Latino Muslims on Jihad so WTH.......

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

This is why things are the way they are.People sitting on their front porch, with a small view of the world.Don't worry Andy and Barney will protect you !


https://www.numbersusa.com/content/learn/illegal-immigration/seven-amnesties-passed-congress.html
1. Immigration and Reform Control Act (IRCA), 1986: A blanket amnesty for some 2.7 million illegal aliens
2. Section 245(i) Amnesty, 1994: A temporary rolling amnesty for 578,000 illegal aliens
3. Section 245(i) Extension Amnesty, 1997: An extension of the rolling amnesty created in 1994
4. Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) Amnesty, 1997: An amnesty for close to one million illegal aliens from Central America
5. Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act Amnesty (HRIFA), 1998: An amnesty for 125,000 illegal aliens from Haiti
6. Late Amnesty, 2000: An amnesty for some illegal aliens who claim they should have been amnestied under the 1986 IRCA amnesty, an estimated 400,000 illegal aliens
7. LIFE Act Amnesty, 2000: A reinstatement of the rolling Section 245(i) amnesty, an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens

LV Mom
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Too bad we can't kill these undesirable "illegals", amirite Judy?

LeRoy Grimace LeRoy Grimace
Jul '14

http://www.laht.com/article.asp?ArticleId=1564160&CategoryId=14091&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+laht%2Fmailer+%28Latin+American+Herald+Tribune%29




Mexico Receives $21.59 Billion in Remittances in 2013

MEXICO CITY – Mexico received $21.59 billion in remittances from emigrants in 2013, a figure that was down 3.7 percent compared to 2012, the Bank of Mexico said.

The 2013 figure did not surpass the $22.44 billion in remittances received in 2012 even though the flow had been trending higher since August.

Nearly 74 million transactions were registered in 2013, with the average remittance totaling $292, the central bank said.

Remittances rose 3.5 percent to $5.34 billion in the fourth quarter of last year, compared to the same period in 2012, with 18.4 million transactions and an average amount of $285.30, the Bank of Mexico said.

Analysts had projected a drop in remittances in 2013, but they are expecting a rebound this year.

Remittances sent by Mexicans living abroad, mainly in the United States, are the country’s second-largest source of foreign exchange, after oil, and help cover the living expenses of millions of people.

LV Mom
Jul '14

LV Mom Who exactly is going to do those low skill low-paying jobs you. Or maybe you could pull your kids out of school to do them.. Most of them do jobs that Americans won't do take a drive past any big vegetable or fruit farm and see how many American workers you see. Americans will not pick vegetables all day in the hot sun for minimum wage.

oldred
Jul '14

I think we all here agree that illegal immigration needs to be prevented.

There is significant disagreement as to the facts of what is actually going on. Everyone has at least some truth on their side.

For better or worse, our illegal immigrant population is a significant factor in our economy and society. If they were suddenly to disappear, we would need to loosen the rules quickly to let in a lot more legal immigrants, because with our aging population, we can't make it without them.


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/07/02/medical-staff-warned-keep-quiet-about-illegal-immigrants-or-face-arrest/


Medical staff warned: Keep your mouths shut about illegal immigrants or face arrest


A government-contracted security force threatened to arrest doctors and nurses if they divulged any information about the contagion threat at a refugee camp housing illegal alien children at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, sources say.

In spite of the threat, several former camp workers broke their confidentiality agreements and shared exclusive details with me about the dangerous conditions at the camp. They said taxpayers deserve to know about the contagious diseases and the risks the children pose to Americans. I have agreed to not to disclose their identities because they fear retaliation and prosecution.

LV Mom
Jul '14

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/07/01/krauthammer_if_fences_dont_work_why_is_there_one_around_the_white_house.html

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Alright, here's what I've been on for years. You start with a fence. It's very simple. People say, 'Oh, fences don't work. You make a ladder.' Well, then you build two fences, triple strand fences. San Diego did that in the mid 90's and within a decade, the illegal immigration rate at that point was reduced by 90% and people ended up going through other places like Arizona.

If fences don't work, why is there one around the White House? ******If they don't work, why is it that the Israeli fence which separate Israel from the West Bank has cut down terror attacks within Israel by 99%.********* Fences work. Yes, there are parts of the border where you can't have a fence, fine. So you don't have it in those areas and you do heavy patrols. But there is no reason why a rich country like us cannot put a fence across -- a double fence, a triple fence and patrol it all the time. That would have a tremendous impact.

LV Mom
Jul '14

We need more of this. Bus them to Hollywood and let the rich liberal movie stars adopt them..

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Immigrants-Headed-to-Murrieta-Despite-Opposition-265381911.html

uses carrying migrant families were rerouted to a U.S.-Mexican border station after being blocked by protesters waving American flags in a suburban Southern California city Tuesday.

Protesters, some yelling, "They're not born here!" and "Go back to Mexico!" stood in the street, blocking the buses as they were headed to the suburban border patrol station in Murrieta.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Well said LV Mom!


and the mayor of the town urged his residents to go out in the street and block the buses, good. we need more of that around here,

fences do work, why is there one around the whitehouse if fences don't work?

take down the whitehouse fence and see what happens.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

The Israeli fence doesn't divide Israel from the West Bank. If it did, it would be in the middle of the Jordan River. Israel has built the fence IN the West Bank, thereby de facto annexing part of it.

I assume we can't build the fence on Mexican soil. In the area where the Rio Grande is the border, if we build it on our soil, then there is a part of the US on the other side of the fence we would still be responsible for.

Can we build it right in the Rio Grande? I don't know the issues that may be involved in that.


Smugglers Threaten Landowners in Cameron County

http://www.krgv.com/news/smugglers-threaten-landowners-in-cameron-county/

skippy skippy
Jul '14

jd2 Now let me get this straight you want to spend all that money building a fence between Mexico and the U.S when the roads and bridges in this country are literally falling apart And to you LV Mom you have got to be a Fox news viewer

oldred
Jul '14

The US/ Mexico border is Almost 2000 miles long. You want to pay for a fence that long???

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

On October 26, 2006, U.S. President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Pub.L. 109–367) into law stating, “This bill will help protect the American people. This bill will make our borders more secure. It is an important step toward immigration reform."

um - it's already supposed to be built.. Congress failed to fund the project sufficiently in order to finish building the fence

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Um that bill was for only 700miles. but what about the other 1200+ miles?

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Oldred, no, I'm not taking a position on the fence. I was trying to correct/clarify what LV Mom said about the Israeli fence, and suggesting some difficulties there are for a fence along the Rio Grande. I'm not at all enthusiastic about a fence, though not totally against it everywhere.

Incidentally, I've read that the Mexican economy has improved, and its population is aging, meaning that immigration pressure from there is lessening. But, it is increasing from Asia.


skippy maybe Bush needed the money for his friends.

oldred
Jul '14

There is plenty of history to draw from to see that walls have never successfully stemmed "invasions". Doesn't matter if it's the Great Wall of China, or the Berlin Wall (a reverse invasion), or the Palestinian Wall. It's an extremely expensive undertaking for something that doesn't work.

Once you build that 2000 mile wall along the Mexican border (very, very expensive and also disruptive to American citizens too), then you have to maintain and man it. Anybody care to estimate what that costs? If it's not sufficiently manned then people are going to cross. And of course if the wall works then probably we will see more infiltration along the southern coasts. Maybe we can fortify the beaches too?

You can't fence people out - you have to deal with the reasons they are coming here if you want to stop the wave. The smart thing to do is deal with the root cause and not the symptoms. If you got an infection with a fever and your doctor gave you aspirin to take care of the fever you would think he was incompetent. You need antibiotics to deal with the cause of the fever. It's the same thing we face with illegal immigration.


I think we need a fence around the Bundy farm.

Better yet, move him to Cameron county and let him free graze his cows in Mexico. We save the land and, for once, we can be the illegal aliens.

And he can shoot anyone coming across, or in Mexico, or .......

It's a win-win.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Just curious if all these anti-immigration protestors are of American Indian ancestry? I'm sure most are children or grandchildren of immigrants. Lucky for them that no one was standing at the docks with anti- immigration signs when their ancestors came over on the boats. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Redwing
Jul '14

Last night on the news,the Illegals are getting bus tickets, traveling all over the country,getting off the bus,and we have no idea where they are.They were followed by the news media, to an address they said they were going to.Never showed,just landed in another state. Great job Obama,are they sick, have they been in trouble with the law,are they mentally ill.We just don't know,so he blames congress, congress blames him ! South America to Hackettstown,in about 5 days.I guess at Shoprite, monday,the pool tuesday,hospital wednesday,day work thursday,jersey shore friday. Why not come here?


I thought money from the stimulus bill was suppose to pay for road and bridge repair? Where did all that money go? Oldred do you know? And yes I too watch Fox news but more importantly I am a mother and grandmother who is worried about what is happening to this country and am scared for my children and grandchildren.


Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Of course if you try FOX, you'll find some other stuff that the fact-checkers have mostly shot down.

This one does not seem to roll TARP in so it's the 800B view.

Lots of bridges.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Just because they are "illegal" does not stop these people from abusing weaknesses in our system. Abusing the system is what it is all about these days. Unions, Zionists, Capitalists...

RAD, if we didn't give away 4-14+ billion a year to Israel we would have money for crazy projects like a 2,000 double or triple fence system. It might not be that great in the end, but at least we can look at something we got for billions of taxpayer dollars...


Illegal immigration could be stopped dead if the illegals are not welcomed at our borders as they are now. Just look at the outbreaks of TB over the past few years in California schools. Could be coming to a school near you real soon.

Unfortunately, FOX news is the only station not sugar coating this designed "humanitarian crisis". It is a humanitarian crisis, but not for the illegals. I feel terrible for the towns being forcibly intruded on by our gov't.

They should all be bused to the white house. Oh, but wait, they wouldn't get through the fence.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Redwing, so are you saying you're fine suffering the same fate as our Native
Americans? Maybe they should have tried blocking the boats..but that's not the way it played out. Doesn't mean we should just sit back and be over-run by illegals.

LV Mom
Jul '14

An Oklahoma rep can't get into an Oklahoma illegal holding facility, unbelievable. What are they trying to hide?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/381773/hhs-bars-congressman-seeing-immigrant-children-joel-gehrke

A Health and Human Services official refused to allow a member of Congress to enter a facility in his district where some of the unaccompanied immigrant children are being housed.

Representative Jim Bridenstine (R., Okla.) was told he could schedule an appointment for July 21. “​What are they trying to hide?” Bridenstine said after the incident. “​Do they not want the children to speak with Members of Congress? As a Navy pilot, I have been involved in operations countering illicit human trafficking. I would like to know to whom these children are being released.”
There are 1,200 immigrant children at the base. Bridenstine’s office explained that HHS releases the children to a “sponsor” in the United States. The congressman said that a security guard at the Fort Sill, Okla., facility refused to let him enter the barracks without HHS approval even though he is a member of Congress.

“There is no excuse for denying a federal representative from Oklahoma access to a federal facility in Oklahoma where unaccompanied children are being held,” Bridenstine said in the press release. “Any Member of Congress should have the legal authority to visit a federal youth detention facility without waiting three weeks.”

LV Mom
Jul '14

Actually, "He said he was told he would have to make an appointment, and that the earliest day he could enter was July 21" but still not right.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

What the ignorant LV MOM is neglecting to tell people along with cluster fox news is that president George bush signed the law that anyone under the age of 18 apprehended crossing the border must be house in a facility on till a parent or guardian or relative can be found. I know it must make you feel good to blame Obama but you can put this squarely on good old GB. I can't wait to see what you're going to blame on Hillary Clinton when she's elected president in 2016

oldred
Jul '14

LOL! Of course, the recent "humanitarian crisis" must be Bush's fault!

You people crack me up

LV Mom
Jul '14

Bush signed a law not Obama if you could read I was not blaming Bush for these people crossing the border just that Obama cannot just send them back.. Oh what a Christian nation we pretend to be people in this country are Christian when it suits them. How many of you think Jesus would have been blocking buses full of children ignorant redneck people like LV make this out to be Obama's fault you know the latest conspiracy that Obama is sending buses down to pick up children and bring them to the border. People like you want secure borders but don't want to pay for

oldred
Jul '14

Tens of thousands of illegals make a run for the border whenever an amnesty is dangled in Congress. This is no surprise, it was a manufactured crisis. Since all the other propaganda has failed to convince the American people to swallow another amnesty, they figured they'll try flooding the border with children. You can't say no to children, right?

Of course the problem with amnesty is if you leave a cookie on your doorstep for a rat, the next day there will be ten rats waiting for their free cookies. And if you give those ten rats a cookie, the next day there will be 100 rats wanting THEIR free cookies. It's a never ending cycle.

Ashley Cole
Jul '14

Oh no, Ashley Cole.


oldred, I would much prefer to be lumped in with the "rednecks" than the liberals.

This is solely on BHO, like it or not. And I personally believe this is exactly what he wants.

Ashley, perfect analogy, rats...

LV Mom
Jul '14

Wow very Christian of you LV mom. Calling human children rats

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

Hey, don't you call LVMom a Redneck.

We have our pride.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/savage-media-hiding-illegal-alien-disease-threat/

You’re not going to hear this’

As thousands of illegal-alien children, prompted by President Obama’s policies, overwhelm the capacity of southern border states, Border Patrol agents who essentially have been turned into child caretakers are being exposed to disease, Savage said.

“Right now, you’re not going to hear this, but we have Tuberculosis, hand-foot-and-mouth disease, Chagas disease – previously eradicated from Southern California – on the rise and testing positive in … Border Patrol agents,” Savage said.


Other diseases emerging among Border Patrol agents, he said, include H1N1 Swine flu and chicken pox.

“The Border Patrol is being threatened with lawsuits and firing if they disclose this,” he said. “Congressmen are being turned away from the border as they go to investigate this surge of infected illegal aliens being thrown across the border at us.”


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/savage-media-hiding-illegal-alien-disease-threat/#dthjsyzHl8xcbwwY.99

LV Mom
Jul '14

Yeah, the entire thing is all Obama policies.

Cuz Congress no work, Congress no count.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

MG, I'm no fan of congress either. But, BHO is the president and the buck stops there. He invited this imo. His "dream act" come true, be damned the taxpayers who opposed.

Darwin, harsh, I know, but charity begins at home. Veterans and American citizens are being denied services these illegals are given by simply crossing into the US. They're even better dressed than many of our legal citizens. How can this be okay with you?

LV Mom
Jul '14

MG, you aren't a redneck, you're a typical liberal. Maybe you wear cowboy boots? Doesn't make you a redneck, sorry.

LV Mom
Jul '14

If a redneck typically has a mullet, how does their neck get red?

MeisterNJ MeisterNJ
Jul '14

"Darwin, harsh, I know, but charity begins at home"

Not harsh, more like a hypocrite. These are your fellow Christians you are calling rats and showing no sympathy for. How are these poor and sick women and children any different than the ones you read about in the Bible? Like Oldred said it's very easy to claim to be a Christian it another thing to actually be one.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/06/05/Leaked-Images-Reveal-Children-Warehoused-in-Crowded-US-Cells-Border-Patrol-Overwhelmed

Leaked Images Reveal Children Warehoused in Crowded U.S. Cells, Border Patrol Overwhelmed

skippy skippy
Jul '14

"Many on the right believe that Democrats are pursuing the so-called Cloward-Piven strategy, in which sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven posited that by overloading welfare rolls, the Democratic Party would be forced to take heavy federal welfare action to save state and local governments"

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/the-cloward-piven-strategy-is-alive-and-well-at-the-border/

skippy skippy
Jul '14

lol all me :)

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Conspiratorial nonsense.


I was cool with you calling me a troublemaker lol

skippy skippy
Jul '14

The buck stops with Obama but Congress is dysfunctional to the point of being traitors to the country. This Tea Party is so obstructionist as to stop everything if nothing will be 100% as they demand. Just look at all the conservatives that just aren't conservative enough for them.

Check the Congressional output; check the amount of new legislation; check who is doing nothing unless we do exactly as they say. You can say it's both sides, but it ain't and only one faction is the new game in town and that's when the stoppage began.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

it is deplorable that our leaders cant get together on this MG

skippy skippy
Jul '14

skippy,

I'm happy to agree with you. Deplorable indeed. Our government is mostly broken. We can't just blame the leaders, though. We voters are to blame also.

Which voters? Voters that don't pay attention --- and, ----voters who pay too much attention!

And the system is to blame.


Obama is just biding his time and enjoying the perks of the job until his term runs out. Don't count on any meaningful action:

http://online.wsj.com/articles/the-daydream-and-the-nightmare-1404421159

MeisterNJ MeisterNJ
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

I bet you these guys wish they had Border security

oldred
Jul '14

yes the mayhem is co-enabled by the liberal mob to get what they want by force instead of by law,

the technique is well known and often used (as history attests to) to force a change by mob rule instead of working legally within the system.

barrak hussein ('i want to fundamentally change ameica') obama is a poor leader, he has no idea how to set the tone to get things done collaboratively, worst president ever, and recent polling confirms it.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Gee, where is that "liberal mob's" illegal mayhem getting them some of that what they want by force? I'm ready for some of that and willing to "co-enable."

What a farce.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

LV Mom Why you talk as if being liberal is something bad most of the best ideas this country ever had were now get ready for this Liberal ideas

Let me give you a little history lesson on being liberal what about those liberal forefathers who thought it would be a good idea to have their own country.

What about those liberal abolitionist who thought it would be a good idea that every man be free

What about those liberal suffragettes who thought it would be a good idea if women had the right to vote

What about those liberal freedom riders who thought it would be a good idea if everyone had the right to vote Yes LV I remember when my great grandmother would talk about the time it was against the law for women to vote even in my lifetime I have seen the great liberal ideas become law I remember in some states it was against the law to marry outside of your race

oldred
Jul '14

Those are not the liberals of today. The democratic party of JFK is not anything like the party of today. How I only wish it was.


simo is correct. Those who call themselves liberals today are mostly socialist.

As for women voting, maybe the forefathers knew what they were doing..and, it doesn't sound like they were very liberal at all. Imo, liberals/socialists are destroying this country.

My parents were JFK democrats, both have only voted republican for quite some time now.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Oldred the word LIBERAL has changed over the years! Liberalism is killing America!

Before the 1960s, in very simple layman's terms, the common usage of 'liberal' meant "free from restraint to study, to think, to speak" as in 'liberal arts degree.' As the 1960s came into full swing the American leftists stole the term 'liberal' to describe themselves, knowing full well that they stood for the exact opposite of the freedom that the word 'liberal' represented. They then allowed 'progressive' to die a slow death.
It didn't take long for the common man to realize that a liberal was a re-packaged progressive who stood against the values and historical traditions that made America great. President Lyndon B. Johnson made that message clear with his Great Society, forever ruining the term ‘liberal.'

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/a_liberal_by_any_other_name.html

Sha44ss Sha44ss
Jul '14

And the word Progressive = Communist= Government Control of EVERYTHING!
http://eaglerising.com/5397/communist-states-america/

How far has fallen the party of the jackass:

Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist [or, today, Islamic] affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist [or Islamic] domination.
Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.
Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
Do away with all loyalty oaths.
Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
Communist_with_a_soft_spot_for_IslaContinue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. (An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”)
Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principal of “separation of church and state.”
Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.”
Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture – education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
Internationalize the Panama Canal.
Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/5397/communist-states-america/#TOpHL2jXAG2E4VgV.99

Sha44ss Sha44ss
Jul '14

NORTH AMERICAN UNION = THE REAL REASON BEHIND THE ILLEGAL INVASION


"This is an organized attempt to open our borders. This is the North American Union, the integration of the USA with Canada and Mexico into a new political union. Some of you may have heard about this; there have been those sounding the alarm on this topic for years. Given what is happening today, it no longer seems as if the NAU is something that can be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. This is simply a continuation of the broader Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), which is meant to economically integrate all three countries (and that of several others) closer together."

http://downtrend.com/jrc410/north-american-union-the-real-reason-behind-illegal-alien-invasion/


MAKES SENSE WHY OUR LEADERS (ON BOTH SIDES) REFUSE TO CLOSE THE BORDER!!

Sha44ss Sha44ss
Jul '14

without secure borders, we have no country,

the blind acceptance of everything coming out of this corrupt white house is just astonishing,

wake up and smell the coffee,

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

I guess they will when it effects them personally. Until then they are living in lala land


Unless your kids are looking to be a day laborer for a landscaper, construction company, painter etc. You really don't have to worry about losing a job to an "illegal".

That said ... those of you claiming "my kids never lost a job to an illegal" as if you are making a point is nonsense, utter nonsense!

Our very own 'legal American citizens' are desperate for work and at this point would take A N Y job ... but can't find one. Not even as a "laborer" because of "illegals" and other forms of semi-legal "loiterers" that sit around curb side stealing the jobs from law abiding American citizens.

Furthermore ... these "illegals and/or loiterers aren't working for cheap anymore either. From what I've heard usually a day rate of $120 - $150 a day or $12 to $20+ an hour.

Despite the fact the illegals are just trying to earn a living, I'm tired of people making them out to be victims. We have legal citizens that need jobs and can't find anything!

And now to the bad news ... it's getting worse!

44yearresident
Jul '14

If the illegals really want to be here,and love our country so much,lets make in mandatory that they serve in the Army.Which would make them citizens,they would have 3 hots and a cot,medical,etc. The woman and children,can do what our citizens do,work and day care till there husbands come home.They must do a two year tour over seas,to protect us,and fight for the country they want to live in.Really very simple!


I agree the military could be a path to entry

Skippy Skippy
Jul '14

The Stupid landscapers and construction workers that pick up these invaders for CHEAP labor are giving them 'on the job training' and then they go get 'FREE GRANTS' paid for by ''we the taxpayers' and become their competition! They wonder why there is no work out there? This is the worst economy I have ever seen....and what is worse is

With the Influx of these people and NO Health screenings....we are in for epidemics that we have never seen before!

IT IS JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE HACKETTSTOWN GETS OUR BUS LOAD!

WHAT IS THE POINT OF HAVING LAWS ANYMORE? When our Government doesn't follow the LAWS the people start to think...

WHY SHOULD WE??? We are heading in a very BAD direction. Anarchy is not far behind.

Sha44ss Sha44ss
Jul '14

Agree Lobo, go by OUR rules or don't abuse our way of life! I was told by a spanish guy here in Hackettstown that he already has a house built in his country. He sends cash back home. Our government allows this to continue! Love our country? Follow OUR rules!

US Infantry
Jul '14

OMGoodness, those are some funny ones.

First, we are all socialists, get over it. Admit it, you love it whenever you reap the benefits of those state-provided perks like roads, snowplowing, and social security (no thank you, I am a free-thinker....)

And then, from the office of "what-me-worry" come the following liberal commie pinko ideas......

"Permit free trade between all nations" (ah, this is a Republican idea.......)
"Grant recognition of Red China" (ah......N I X O N )
"Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions" (ah...if you look at recent decisions, it's conservatives 10, liberals 1)

I can go on and on but frankly, this one is BUSTED to be put under the file: lunatic.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

NO I am not a socialist.I believe those" perks" you mention are paid for with my tax dollars and I pay into social security.


Aside form the job situation, Illegal, legal immigrants and all American citizens should get proper vaccination to prevent pandemics. Those who don't have their children vaccinated put themselves, their children and others at risk of potentially serious and/or fatal illnesses. Unfortunately, many legal and illegal immigrants from all over the world come in carrying 'preventable' diseases and spread it like wildfire. (whooping cough, different influenza strands, hepatitis A & B, polio etc.)

44yearresident
Jul '14

Everyone pays into health subsidies too.......

But no, look it up, Social Security is a socialist program bar none. Sorry. The proof is the day you take out more than you put in, but frankly if you take out less, you are still a socialist, just a very, very nice one.

All good socialists pay into the social programs that benefit them. Some benefit more, some less. Usually people get upset when they believe someone is getting more than they put in, but frankly, that's the concept.

So SS, Medicare, military, public police, unemployment, pulbic firefighters, public libraries, public schools, government college grants, scholarships, and loans, roads (except toll roads); just about anything the government provides as a social program.

Next time you go to a public park be sure to say "hello comrade," because everyone in the park is enjoying socialism at its finest.

Where most people get upset is in the entitlements cuz they think some shiftless welfare cheat is scamming them.

And then they get upset because they think these programs are driving the deficit, running in the red (which some like Medicare are), and taking us down the chute. But the fact is, they are not supposed to and if they do ---- fix it.

So sorry, we're all socialists and most great countries are a blend of socialism and capitalism.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

How many are swimming in Hackettstown pool,with no medical check up before they cross over, and take the bus to the country.But customs will not let certain fruits,and plants in the country,because they could be harmful to us.Keep swimming,look around you,Green Acres was the reason Hackettstown got the pool, that means anyone from any where can swim in it.The illegals come here in need of medical treatment,and are turned loose to go where they want.The only shots they get in their country are the ones they drink.Wake up,America we have all kinds of strains of illness we can't cure right now,where do you think it is coming from.At least 1,500 illegals come over a day,times 365 days, plus the 15 million that are here.Would anyone like to move to Dover,that was a great little town,many years ago !


So then maybe Lobo the solution is simple. In the last century we had Ellis Island because most of the immigrants were coming from Europe and Western Asia. They were processed, had medical checks and were documented before stepping foot on American soil. Maybe opening an West coast Ellis island is a solution since now the majority of immigrants are coming from Mexico and Central America. Have 1 centralized location for them to go to get processed and documented. Make it easier to become a legal imigrant and we will have far less illegal immigrants. Have a place to get background checks, medical checks. Have them issued temp visas and enforce the expiration dates of those visas.

over 12million immigrants passed thru Ellis Island, it was done orderly.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Darwin,its that easy,so why don't they do it !


i have no clue Lobo.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Darwin,its that easy,so why don't they do it ! Lobo

Because we'd be a third world country in no time if they allowed every low educated, no skill, illegal become citizens simply because they crossed our borders. The United States limits immigration and their is an application process that allows more productive immigrants to gain citizenship. These people will only feed off the middle class until there is no longer a middle class.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Medical checks are required of legal immigrants, before they come:

http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2014/chapter-9-health-considerations-for-newly-arrived/before-arrival-in-the-united-states-the-overseas-medical-examination


And now president wants 3.7 million for this mess in emergency funding. Acts as if he didn't know this has been happening for a long time. Even democrats aren't buying it. One afraid it could be his Katrina moment. Only this mess is much worse that Katrina ever was.


LV Mom where did your family come from and when did they get here?

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Once upon a time, when there were no restrictions on immigration, masses of uneducated and low-skilled people came in invited or not invited and did not "feed off the middle class", to use LV Mom's objectionable terminology, but *became* the middle class.

That kind of thing still happens today.

(Yes, immigration does have to be controlled, agree.)


not when they swim across the rio grande jd2 - that's for legal immigrants

skippy skippy
Jul '14

jd2, yes, but times have changed. Those immigrants did not come here looking for hand-outs, they came here looking to become hard working Americans. I don't believe the illegals pouring in at our borders have the same intentions. We have too many social programs already being taken advantage of... They are getting medical treatment and being flown, bussed, etc., to where ever they claim to have family, all at the taxpayer's expense. Poor Americans and veterans aren't getting this preferential treatment. It's so wrong, imo.

You may find "feeding off the middle class" objectionable, but many agree with me.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Really 44yearresident
$12 to $20 an hour I know lot of people who hire day laborers and 99% of them get less than $10.50 an hour. You had to reach pretty deep in your a&^ to come up with that number and to you Lobo & Skippy the Democrats already tryed to give citizenship to those who serve in the military and of course the Republicans filibustered it.
Sha44ss
ask anyone who has money in the stock market if this is the worst economy ever. They will laugh in your face at the end of the Bush presidency my stock portfolio lost over half of its value as of last week my portfolio has tripled in value and as for what's the sense of having any laws you might be right on that one when a Nevada rancher can owe money to the government and not pay it and people make them out to be a hero. America loves socialism social security Medicaid Medicare hell even America's pastime baseball and to a lesser extent football are socialist games in baseball the have's paid money to the have-nots and football you are only allowed them a certain amount of money

oldred
Jul '14

3.7 billion, simo.

'Worse than Katrina'? You sure you want to go there? Americans died during Katrina. I don't know how you can compare tragic death to an immigration situation. Don't agree.

MeisterNJ MeisterNJ
Jul '14

From above: "jd2, yes, but times have changed. Those immigrants did not come here looking for hand-outs"

Other people on this forum complain that they are taking all our jobs. So which is it, handouts, or jobs?

My belief is that they want an opportunity to better themselves and their families, and that jobs, not handouts, are what they want. Of course, there are some exceptions. But I think LV Mom is *mostly* wrong on this.

(Once again, yes, immigration does have to be controlled, agree. I don't demonize the people, though. In their shoes, I, and LV Mom, and many others, would perhaps be doing the same thing.)


jd2, it's my belief they are doing both. They are taking low skilled jobs(more often than not, wages that are not being taxed) and at the same time applying for any aid they can.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Violent MS-13 Gang Members Leave Graffiti on Bathroom Walls of Nogales Border Patrol Processing Center

It was reported earlier that these MS-13 gang members, some of whom have admitted to murder and torture in their home countries, are being held for placement inside the United States.

"But remember, this is a 'humanitarian crisis.' They are just kids," a source working in the Nogales processing center said in frustrated and sarcastic tone. "They are MS-13 gang members. They've done everything from torture to murder. They act as teenage 'enforcers.'"

LV Mom
Jul '14

Again,its illegal,if we do something illegal,the cops are at your door! Why is it the illegals in this town are hands off?The cops know there standing down town without papers,there here illegally,but they are still here ! Makes no sense? If the reason is they have to break the law, they are?


Lobo, First how do the police know they have no papers? Unless they are involved in illegal actions they cannot ask. They can ask for an ID or a driver license. Second standing around on Main St. is not illegal. UNLESS a business owner does not want them there and asks the police to remove them it is not illegal.

Also the reason why some cannot become legal citizens because ALOT of them have been taken by so called lawyers, volunteers and government have taken their money and ran. I have 3 friends that have lost thousands to try to become a legal citizen. 2 from Chili and one from Colombia.

Immigration needs an overhaul and I don't have the answer but to make a blanket statement they are all illegal is not right. Most immigrants just want to make a living and support their families.

Christine Christine
Jul '14

"Why is it the illegals in this town are hands off?"

You want the local police to enforce Federal laws? I don't think local police departments typically get involved with Federal law enforcement except in special circumstances. Has Hackettstown or any other local communities signed 287(g) agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to do that. There are a lot of legal complexities involved - i.e. it would cost us all big $ if they did get involved.


Christine- "Most immigrants just want to make a living and support their families"....Guess what...So do TAX paying Americans. Yes...my family were immigrants (as most of our families were) BUT mine filed the paperwork and paid taxes. NOT under a fake name BTW. Now a days they sneak over our borders and work illegally for less than American workers work for (because after all...employers would rather pay $5 an hour to illegals under the table than $7.25 to documented workers...DUH) ...and you may say...awh they work for less so feel bad for them! BUT....do you want to know the exchange rate?!?! As an example:

http://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=USD&To=HNL
want to know what you can buy with that?!?! http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country_result.jsp?country=Honduras

Now...while Im happy that you have a laughable 3 friends from south/central American countries, I for one, do not wish to pay for them OR the tens (if not hundreds) of thousands that will cross ILLEGALLY in 2014. Im happy that your friends are trying to do things the right way. Maybe they can convince others to follow their lead. Until then, Im sick of paying $4.00/gallon for their gas guzzling busses to their camps in California (thank you for saving the (insert animal type here) and not approving pipeline (Mr. Clinton) that "would take 15 years or more to start producing oil"....fast forward 20+ years! lol....We are all entitled to our opinions, but while my tax dollars are paying for them, your opinions are my reality!


Lobo, in answer to your question, being in the country improperly is a civil offense, not a "crime".


LV Mom, I think the belief you have been presenting, as to the nature of "these people" and their primary motivation, is partly right, but mostly wrong. But at least we agree that the matter needs to be controlled much better than it is at present.

May as well leave it at that.


Sorry DUH I was not answering you I clearly was referring to Lobo's statement.

Nice rant though!

Christine Christine
Jul '14

Oldred said, "I know lot of people who hire day laborers and 99% of them get less than $10.50 an hour."

lol, I am so sure you do.

I'm confident that based on your detailed study you've conducted on this matter and the nobel methods you used to come up with your statistics of 99% of the "people you know" pay less then $10.50 an hour to them will prove to be dead on accurate. lol
I can't imagine the depths you needed to reach up your %$@ to come up with your numbers. However, I am certain it's a new world record. Congrats!

News flash ... This isn't 1997, most of them won't even jump in the truck for less then $12 an hour, Sorry ... perhaps conduct a new study or except reality.

44yearresident
Jul '14

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/382218/border-patrol-tells-agent-you-must-cease-and-desist-speaking-media-ryan-lovelace

Border Patrol Tells Agent: ‘You Must Cease and Desist’ from Speaking with Media

Kathleen Scudder, assistant chief patrol agent of the San Diego Sector, sent the letter to agent Ron Zermeno, health and safety director of National Border Patrol Council Local 1613, notifying him of an investigation into his conduct and to “remind” him that no agent should make statements or issue press releases “without proper authorization.”

Zermeno confirmed the validity of the letter to NRO. He says he thinks the order is retaliation for his actions as a whistleblower, which have involved exposing the public-health risks associated with the illegal immigrants transported to the San Diego Sector. “As a union officer, I feel it’s my job to expose when management is putting people at risk,” he says. “They violated their oath as Border Patrol agents.” Before receiving the cease-and-desist letter, Zermeno wrote Paul Beeson, the San Diego Sector’s chief patrol agent, to explain that two agents at the Brown Field Border Patrol Station contracted scabies after processing illegal immigrants transported from Texas last week, according to a letter obtained by NRO. Zermeno has spoken to local news outlets about the scabies outbreak too.
Scudder writes in the cease-and-desist letter that she’s formed no opinion about the allegations against the agent thus far, but Zermeno says he expects to have his employment terminated. “I’m willing to lose my job over this because I know I’m doing the right thing,” Zermeno says. “I’ve been in this agency for 20 years and this is the worst I’ve seen it. It’s similar to the VA.”

LV Mom
Jul '14

This is just so simple,you cover the border with military,you tell them turn around and go back! If you can pay the coyotes to get you across the border,why can't you pay to become legal.What ever happened to getting a sponsor.I guess that would open a can of worms! We try to solve the world's problems,look under are bridges,look in the streets,veterans,sick teenagers,seniors,and we worry about the illegals coming across,and Obama wants billions to fix the problem! Why not fix our problems, billions could feed a lot of Americans!


MeisterNJ.. I didn't say it. I was repeating what a democratic congressman said. Actually I don't believe it's anything like Katrina. Bush had not control over a hurricane Obama has know for a long time this has been happening.


"This is just so simple,you cover the border with military,you tell them turn around and go back!" "Obama wants billions to fix the problem! Why not fix our problems, billions could feed a lot of Americans!"

Ah, so you think the military is free? Think again. Not saying it's a good or bad idea, just saying that it certainly is not free. And it's not like the military is just lying about not doing anything so we would probably have to recruit too so add it training costs, new equipment, etc. Perhaps that's what the billions is for.........

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

India has 500,000 troops on their borders, mostly with Pakistan. They are called their Border Security Force. Why our country does not have the necessary resources on our southern border is the concern; money wasted on excessive spending in other areas leaves nothing in the pot except for now as an emergency measure. We should have double fences with monitoring and drones on the entire length.


This is what the billions requested is for:

The requested appropriations include:
¡$1.8 billion to the HHS's Administration for Children and Families: to provide more stable, cost-effective arrangements and medical care for unaccompanied children.
¡$1.1 billion to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): for the detention, prosecution, and removal of undocumented families, as well as transportation costs for unaccompanied children.
¡$432 million to Customs and Border Protection: for operational costs, an expanded Border Enforcement Security Task Force, and increased air surveillance in Texas' Rio Grande Valley.
¡$295 million to the State Department's (and other international programs') Economic Support Fund: for the repatriation and reintegration of deported migrants, and to address the root causes of migration in Central America.
¡$62 million to the Department of Justice: for additional immigration judges and legal representation for the children.

Notably, Obama's letter to House Speaker John Boehner did not include a request to alter the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2008. That law requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to turn over unaccompanied children from countries other than Canada and Mexico to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which temporarily houses them in shelters while it locates US-based family members or sponsors. (The kids are in removal proceedings throughout.)

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

What iJay said. But that would anger the pro-illegal immigration groups, who, of course, vote for dems.

LV Mom
Jul '14

There's been drones on the border since 2005.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

officers get a C&D letter and cant speak to media.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/382218/border-patrol-tells-agent-you-must-cease-and-desist-speaking-media-ryan-lovelace

skippy skippy
Jul '14

iJay- "money wasted on excessive spending"? You must mean the $1 Trillion spent on Bush's war with Iraq? Or possibly you refer to the $1 Trillion in tax cuts Bush gave to millionaires? Or the money spent to recover from the economic crash which somehow happened during Bush's tenure?

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

Why do anything then? The Forum is divided just like the country,nobody can agree,so things keep happening.Get ready for English as our second language! Read these posts,sounds like a lot of people voted for Obama,and are now the victims of there choice!


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dem-rep-rips-obama-aloof-bizarre-and-detached_796290.html

Democratic congressman Henry Cuellar ripped President Obama for being "aloof" and "detached" by not visiting the Texas border to see first hand the immigration crisis. Cuellar made the comments on MSNBC:



"He's so close to the border. And let me say this: when I saw, and I hate to use the word bizarre, but under the circumstances, when he is shown playing pool in Colorado, drinking a beer, and he can't even go 242 miles to the Texas border, and plus, if he doesn't want to go down to the border, there's the Air Force Base where HHS is holding some of the young kids from the border. He could at least make that trip to San Antonio, but again, border community leaders wants to see him down there on the border, and I think the optics and the substance of it is that he should show up at the border," said Cuellar.

And he had some advice for the White House."If they are worried about putting a face, the president's face, to this human crisis, humanitarian crisis, I think it's worse if he doesn't even show up. Either way, he's going to be tied into this humanitarian crisis. he either can roll up his sleeves and go down to the border, or he can just look aloof and detached and not go to the border, send surrogates down there, and say that he's got everything under control."

He adds, "It Just floored me, because if he's saying he's too busy to go to the border but you have time to drink beer, play pool."

The president was in Colorado last night -- drinking beer and playing pool.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Cuellar said "Or he can just look aloof and detached", seems this his MO whenever a crisis arises. He just hopes they go away without him taking any actions unless the crap stats hitting the fan. He needs his time to play pool, barbecue with Bobby Flay, do some fundraisers while there are crisis's happening at home and all over the world.

kb2755 kb2755
Jul '14

This is the problem with so-called conservatives. They bitch if Obama shows up to a problem a la Superstorm Sandy, and they bitch when he doesn't. It's not hard to figure out that it's not about what the Pesident does, they just want to cry and complain about anything he does.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jul '14

Yes Gladfly that's it. Has nothing to do with the fact that when he came to NJ during the hurricane that it was an election year. Oh, there I go again!!! Just bitching


http://news.yahoo.com/border-surge-overwhelming-us-officials-214521964.html

In Washington, Sen. John McCain, a Republican who has supported Obama's stalled quest to remake the nation's immigration laws, said he could not support the president's spending request.

"I cannot vote for a provision which will then just perpetuate an unacceptable humanitarian crisis that's taking place on our southern border," McCain said on the Senate floor, where he was joined by fellow Arizonan Jeff Flake and Texas Republicans John Cornyn and Ted Cruz. They took take turns blaming Obama's policies for causing the border situation, contending that his efforts to relax some deportations have contributed to rumors circulating in Central America that once here, migrant kids will be allowed to stay.

"Amnesty is unfolding before our very eyes," Cruz said.


In the House, Speaker John Boehner was noncommittal about bringing the spending measure to a vote.

"If we don't secure the border, nothing's going to change. And if you look at the president's request, it's all more about continuing to deal with the problem," Boehner told reporters.

Meanwhile immigration advocacy groups attacked the spending request from the left, saying it was overly focused on enforcement. A group of civil liberties organizations filed a lawsuit in Seattle against the Obama administration, arguing that the federal government is failing to provide the minors with legal representation.

And even some Democrats said Obama would be well-advised to visit the border and see the situation for himself.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Flashback: Obama says border stronger than ever:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/text-obama-s-speech-on-immigration-from-el-paso-texas-20110510

skippy skippy
Jul '14

This is a tough one and it takes more than a President on the bully pulpit to solve. Or if you want the President to fix it, then you better live with Executive Orders.

"The U.S. Senate passed an immigration bill last year, but the measure has stalled in the House of Representatives where Republicans remain deeply split over what to do about the more than 11 million undocumented U.S. residents.

Many Republicans want to await the outcome of November's elections before revisiting the issue." Reuters

In terms of the numbers, it's a bit of a fog: more fences and technology than ever, more agents than ever, less arrests at the border, many areas secure, but the illegals just move to unsecured areas. And then there's the kids. Fact is, many of these kids don't get into America; they stop at the border and turn themselves in.

"The explosion of illegal crossings by unaccompanied minors is not the result of inadequate border security. The youths are being captured right at the border — by the tens of thousands. In fact, many are surrendering without even trying to run.

Hiring more Border Patrol officers won’t stem the flood of young people — now around 52,000 — that is overwhelming federal detention facilities. The problem is a lack of space to hold the detained children, along with a severely understaffed immigration court system to process them and other migrants in a timely fashion.

The administration and Congress share the blame for the crisis. They have repeatedly failed to agree on changes that would enable Homeland Security to cope with the flow and more quickly dispense with immigration court cases.

Texas has more than 55,000 cases pending, and the average wait time is 434 days for a case to be adjudicated, according to Syracuse University’s Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse, which compiles immigration court statistics." Dallas News

To me, the issue starts with Congressional failure to act. http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20140624-editorial-stemming-the-young-immigrant-flood.ece

And it ends with Congressional failure to act: http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/28198205-452/a-border-crisis-born-of-inaction.html

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

"We taxpayers are expected to house, feed, clothe and care for almost 30,000 illegal aliens for a full year, according to the White House’s official request. That’s a small city.
Instead, we could fly all of them home for one-half of 1 percent of the $3.8 billion that President Obama proposes we spend. That’s a savings of 99.5 percent!"


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/8/istook-flying-illegals-home-would-be-995-percent-c/#ixzz374MXEE58

skippy skippy
Jul '14

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0706/p09s01-coop.html

here is how Eisenhower solved it - He rounded up and deported 2 million by threatening corporations and border agents sending them back. They stopped when they realized it was useless.

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Actually there was only one year of negative access during the Eisenhower program; all other years had a plus gain.

Today it would be doubtful that we would shave their heads, put em on a crowded boat and drop them deep in remote desert areas of Mexico.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

We have to many feel good socialist people today to do the wet back program. Now they are on the dole just like the imirgrants and big business and the few invested in them are laughing all the way to the bank. Its a rich and a poor country now.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

I vote for Tim Howard to run border control

Hack in Town Hack in Town
Jul '14

Why don't we just send the bill to their home country? If they don't pay, we halt all imports of their goods like produce, coffee, clothing, etc. Put some sort of pressure on them. Eh, will never happen, but it's a nice idea.

Why is the burden solely on the US? Not once have I heard anything about the home countries of these people and children. They want no responsibility. Terrible.

MeisterNJ MeisterNJ
Jul '14

no coffee?... pft.

skippy skippy
Jul '14

I think we should re-locate the White House and everyone in it to Mexico.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-defends-not-visiting-texas-border-saying-hes-not-interested-in-photo-ops/2014/07/09/b7c5d77e-079e-11e4-a0dd-f2b22a257353_story.html

Obama defends not visiting Texas border, saying he’s ‘not interested in photo ops’

ROFL Okay, I dare one Obama supporter to tell me they believe that! The man opens his mouth and you can count on one thing, he's lying.

LV Mom
Jul '14

I dunno; I don't think there's one Republican who "requested" immediate access to the centers that was NOT looking for a photo op.

I mean what were they going to do from the visit? More nothing?

I am not sure what positive thing Obama could have done by visiting. Convince Congress to do more nothing?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

skippy
the president cannot just send them back under the child sex trafficking law illegal children under the age of 18 most have a hearing to determine that they are not part of the sex trafficking ring.

So now we'll see how bad the Republicans want to stop illegal immigration. The president has called them out and told them give me the money I need to put 15 to 20,000 new border patrol agents on the border into speed up deportations will see if they really want to do it or just bitch about it to score political points and rile up their base. I bet the Republicans will do nothing

oldred
Jul '14

I haven't purchased anything labeled "Mexico" in quite some time now. I would never vacation there either.

Old Gent, you're right. Pretty soon the middle class will be pretty much extinct.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Really LVmom

You want to talk about photo ops’ how about all the tea baggers and Republicans having their photo ops’
with veterans at all the war memorials when the government was shut down saying things like our veterans deserve the very best we need to do everything in our power to help our veterans and then turnaround and vote yes to the veterans Bill in public and as soon as the veterans Bill gets behind closed doors Republicans and teabagers kill it

oldred
Jul '14

Bingo!

http://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2014/07/10/hypocrites-take-a-selfish-stance-on-border-crisis-n1860332

Hypocrites Take a Selfish Stance on Border Crisis

Here in the U.S., how can our government simply choose not to enforce existing laws? In reaction, could U.S. citizens emulate Washington's ethics and decide not to pay their taxes, or to disregard traffic laws, or to build homes without permits? Who in the pen-and-phone era of Obama gets to decide which law to follow and which to ignore?
Who are the bigots -- the rude and unruly protestors who scream and swarm drop-off points and angrily block immigration authority buses to prevent the release of children into their communities, or the shrill counter-protestors who chant back "Viva La Raza" ("Long Live The Race")? For that matter, how does the racialist term "La Raza" survive as an acceptable title of a national lobby group in this politically correct age of anger at the Washington Redskins football brand?

How can American immigration authorities simply send immigrant kids all over the United States and drop them into communities without firm guarantees of waiting sponsors or family? If private charities did that, would the operators be jailed? Would American parents be arrested for putting their unescorted kids on buses headed out of state?

Liberal elites talk down to the cash-strapped middle class about their illiberal anger over the current immigration crisis. But most sermonizers are hypocritical. Take Nancy Pelosi, former speaker of the House. She lectures about the need for near-instant amnesty for thousands streaming across the border. But Pelosi is a multimillionaire, and thus rich enough not to worry about the increased costs and higher taxes needed to offer instant social services to the new arrivals.

Progressives and ethnic activists see in open borders extralegal ways to gain future constituents dependent on an ever-growing government, with instilled grudges against any who might not welcome their flouting of U.S. laws. How moral is that?

Likewise, the CEOs of Silicon Valley and Wall Street who want cheap labor from south of the border assume that their own offspring's private academies will not be affected by thousands of undocumented immigrants, that their own neighborhoods will remain non-integrated, and that their own medical services and specialists' waiting rooms will not be made available to the poor arrivals.

Have immigration-reform advocates such as Mark Zuckerberg of Michael Bloomberg offered one of their mansions as a temporary shelter for needy Central American immigrants? Couldn't Yale or Stanford welcome homeless immigrants into their now under-occupied summertime dorms? Why aren't elite academies such as Sidwell Friends or the Menlo School offering their gymnasia as places of refuge for tens of thousands of school-age Central Americans?

LV Mom
Jul '14

With Obama the answer is throw money at it. Bush just be Compassionate . Where is a Leader to do what is best for the country. Being over run and out of control is not best for the country.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

LV Mom, I assume you will also not be vacationing in Honduras, El Salvador or Guatemala. Or purchasing their goods...better check those walmart labels! Oh, and thanks for the link to Town Hall...it may replace The Onion as my go-to website for a quick laugh!

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

LVMOM

Wasn't it people like you who made heroes out of a Nevada rancher and armed militia people that drew down on the government officials when they were enforcing existing laws. Like I said the president has called out the Republicans and is giving them almost exactly what they want more agents faster deportation hearings and a one-way tickets for the people to get back home but of course the Republicans like usual will do nothing. God forbid they are seen working with the president on a problem their base will never forgive them and they will most likely be voted out

oldred
Jul '14

LV Mom: every time you buy bread, you are supporting a Mexican corporation. Many US corp's manufacture out of Mexico.

By the by, most of the kids are not from Mexico.........

And who says he is not enforcing the laws?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

I agree with Coburn. I don't believe for a second that BHO will use this money to close the border and send all of these illegals back. It's more like hiring more baby-sitters at the border. I think they're already receiving better health care than many Americans.

The Obama administration has adopted a policy of deporting only violent criminals. It has also enacted a program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which provides amnesty to people who arrived to the U.S. as children.

Coburn also supported the reversal of a 2008 anti-sex trafficking law that requires Customs and Border Protection to hand unaccompanied children from countries that do not border the U.S. to the Department of Health and Human Services, which houses them and seeks to place them with sponsors while they await deportation proceedings.

“What we have to do is change the 2008 law, and say, if you’re not contiguous with us, we’re going to treat you just like you were contiguous with us,” Coburn told CNN.

“We can change that in two weeks in the Senate and the House. Just reverse that law, retroactively.”

Asked if he opposes Obama’s $3.7 billion funding proposal — which was nearly double the administration’s initial $2 billion request — Coburn said he does.

“I’m opposing that money because the money’s going to be asked for again next year,” he said.

Coburn also commented on public opposition to Obama’s stance on immigration, saying that resentment towards the administration’s policies is aimed at a deeper issue.

“It’s not immigration,” said Coburn. “It’s that they don’t see our government enforcing our laws.”



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/09/senator-offers-cheaper-solution-to-fix-border-surge/#ixzz3752j54nU

LV Mom
Jul '14

Why does it matter where an individual is from? Deport them to the spot where they illegally entered the country and be done with it. Let Mexico worry about getting them to their southern border.

ianimal ianimal
Jul '14

"Here in the U.S., how can our government simply choose not to enforce existing laws? In reaction, could U.S. citizens emulate Washington's ethics and decide not to pay their taxes, or to disregard traffic laws, or to build homes without permits? Who in the pen-and-phone era of Obama gets to decide which law to follow and which to ignore?"


this is true, and today America is a banana republic due to the behavior of Barrack Hussein Obama

the law is whatever he says it is today. enforce some laws *IF* it suits him, . make up other laws on his own with the stroke of a pen or a pronouncement speech, and ignoring other laws that he just doesn't like in a true banana republic fashion.

President Obama has single-handedly turned the USA into a banana republic.

and we just watched him do it and the media will not question him about it. and even the libs are having buyers remorse at this rude awakening, realizing that he is not the man they voted for,

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

I wonder if BHO will ask for emergency funds to go get them.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/09/mexican-train-derails-migrants_n_5572681.html

Mexican Train Derails, Stranding 1,300 Migrants Headed Toward U.S.
MEXICO CITY, July 9 (Reuters) - A cargo train used by Mexicans and Central Americans to travel toward the U.S. border derailed in the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca on Wednesday, stranding about 1,300 migrants, emergency services said.

Many of the migrants aboard were young people and nobody was injured when the train nicknamed "the Beast" came off the tracks, a spokesman for local emergency services said.

Since last October, more than 50,000 unaccompanied minors, most from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, have been caught illegally crossing the southwest border of the United States.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Mexcio will have that train back on the track before sun down.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Talk about mixing apples and oranges; and I think there's a plum in there too. Do you ever read about the points you make as you make them?

First, is there something illegal with DACA? Do you really want to spend our money going after people who came to America as kids before 2007, are under 31, are either in school, have a high school degree, GED or honorable discharge and no criminal record?

75% of DACA applicants have lived here for over a decade. That's where you want to spend our money chasing these people down to enforce the law? Seems like a waste of money for some weird principle. How about the statute of liberty, I mean limitations.

"And now for something completely different:"

“We can change that in two weeks in the Senate and the House. Just reverse that law, retroactively.” So quit talking about it and do it instead of doing nothing...... Only two Republicans originally opposed this Republican bill that you are accusing Obama of not enforcing while you accuse him more for enforcing it. Because right now, your main problem is that Obama is enforcing the law that the conservatives wrote and passed. I think Coburn voted for the original bill. Darn that Bushman for singing that one in; you just can't trust those conservatives.

But go Tom go and change the conservative bill. But this time, try to write one without unintended consequences so you don't screw it up like you did last time.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

"Deport them to the spot where they illegally entered the country and be done with it. Let Mexico worry about getting them to their southern border."

this is a good idea, because we need to secure our own borders, without secure borders we don't have a country, just a an undefined mob. not good.

Eisenhower had the right idea, and his program busing them back made a big difference. We build the fence, and start busing them back to Mexico. drop them all of right there. It will make a big difference,

word will get around and many will stop trying just like they did in Eisenhower's time.

towns, cities and states should all sue the federal government for dumping these unwanted illegals on their doorsteps with no plan or provision for their care.

40% of elementary age school children in Fairfax Va are ESL.

Hello? is anybody tuned in? at all ? this administration is hosing us all down with sick illegal alien children, using them as pawns in their game; weaponizing them in their attempt to change red states blue. ("What about the children? It's all for the children, the little children . . . . . .") sounds a lot like the teachers union vamping for bigger raises and more time off; "It's all about the kids" ; Really? Hello? Is anybody gettin' it yet? anyone?

this is sick, sick, sick, and it needs to be called out for what it is, so speak up america.

WOW!

plenty of sick hungry kids living in gang violence and poverty in Palestine, china, eastern europe and russia, the Philippines. Why don't we just let them all come in here right now? It's all for the kids, right? let's take them all in then, where's your compassion?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

"40% of elementary age school children in Fairfax Va are ESL. "

Fairfax County is one of the most affluent areas in the country. Are you sure that many of the ESL students aren't the children of Ambassadors of other countries?

ianimal ianimal
Jul '14

We will have to get ready for all the parents and siblings of these kids to come here too. You know that will be next. After all, they need their families. Really makes me sick to think about this whole mess.

justwondering justwondering
Jul '14

MG, I'm sure you understood why Coburn brought up DACA, but just in case you're not just playing dumb. And, I didn't see where he said it should reversed but we can't keep granting amnesty to those who come here illegally.

“What changed was the expectation that you could come here, and you wouldn’t be sent home,” Coburn said.

The Obama administration has adopted a policy of deporting only violent criminals. It has also enacted a program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which provides amnesty to people who arrived to the U.S. as children.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/09/senator-offers-cheaper-solution-to-fix-border-surge/#ixzz375brhcl5

LV Mom
Jul '14

(Washington Post) – The kindergartners of the Class of 2026, who finished their first year in Fairfax County schools Wednesday, constitute the largest and one of the most ethnically, culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups of students the county has seen, a fact that school system administrators say could pose significant challenges in the decade to come.

Long an enclave of predominantly white, middle-class families with a top-class school system, Fairfax has experienced a dramatic demographic shift in recent years that is nowhere more obvious than in the county’s kindergarten classrooms. The white student population is receding and is being replaced with fast-growing numbers of poor students and children of immigrants for whom English is a second language.

More than one-third of the 13,424 kindergartners in the county this year qualified for free or reduced-price meals, a federal measure of poverty, and close to 40 percent of the Class of 2026 requires additional English instruction, among the most ever for a Fairfax kindergarten class.

- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/40-kindergarteners-fairfax-virginia-schools-require-english-instruction-46011/#sthash.sFcSsGC9.dpuf

LV Mom
Jul '14

Doesn't seem to be a "south of the border" problem though... the area just seems to be popular with immigrants, not necessarily illegals:

--------------------------------------------------

More than 160 foreign languages are spoken in Fairfax County schools, the most prevalent being Spanish, Korean, Vietnamese, Arabic and Mandarin Chinese.

Many immigrant families are drawn to Fairfax, the nation’s second-most affluent county, with a median household income of more than $105,000, by the reputation of its public schools. That Fairfax “is a very international community, multilingual and multicultural, is an attraction” for foreign-language speaking families, Pedaris said.

While some ESOL students are immigrants themselves, the majority were born in the United States to immigrant parents. But not all the children who live in homes where English is a second language need additional English instruction, Predaris said. She said many children are bilingual and are already proficient English speakers.


At Lynbrook Elementary School, principal Mary McNamee said between 80 and 90 percent of the 560 students — pre-kindergarten through sixth grade — speak foreign languages at home. Officials said the school in Springfield has one of the highest concentrations of ESOL elementary students in the county, with more than 75 percent of the school’s students receiving such instruction. Bailey’s Elementary School for the Arts and Sciences in Falls Church, with an enrollment of 1,300, has the most ESOL students, with more than 660.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/number-of-fairfax-students-who-speak-a-foreign-language-at-home-to-surpass-50-percent/2012/09/08/de47a92a-f84d-11e1-8253-3f495ae70650_story.html

ianimal ianimal
Jul '14

LV Mom, I realize your information is provided by the Tea Party, but it simply doesn't make sense. The median household income is $ 107,096 and the median family income is $ 124,831. Median market price for owned homes (single family detached, attached, and multifamily) is $ 442,370. Median rental complex rent is $ 1,590. Just where are these poor immigrants living?

http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/demogrph/gendemo.htm

Lady Jayne Lady Jayne
Jul '14

That's a 2012 article ianimal.

“We’re all ESOL teachers here,” said Principal Mary McNamee, noting that literacy has become central to the school’s curriculum.

In the school’s front office, the administrative staff primarily speaks Spanish to the students and their families. Most parents are not literate in their own language, McNamee said. Meredith Hopkins, a third-year kindergarten teacher at Lynbrook, said she has never had a native English speaker in her classes.

Velkoff, the School Board member, attributes part of the rapid growth of Hispanic families in Fairfax to controversial policies in neighboring jurisdictions that he said were hostile to immigrants.
The 2010 documentary “9500 Liberty” highlighted the contentious debate surrounding immigration in Northern Virginia. The film focused on a law enacted in 2008 in Prince William County that allowed police to question a person’s immigration status during routine traffic stops. The strict aspects of the law were rolled back after the county’s chief of police came out against the policy.

School officials said there is evidence that some immigrant families moved to Fairfax after Prince William’s law took effect; the Fairfax school system experienced an increase of 14,000 Hispanic students between 2008 and 2014.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/in-fairfax-county-kindergarten-classes-school-systems-future-comes-into-focus/2014/06/28/1ced10d2-f25e-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html

LV Mom
Jul '14

Understanding what the children face at home, Mason Crest teachers do not require homework, Kerr said.

For some students, home is a trailer park. At Audubon Estates near Alexandria, the 700 trailers house more than 1,500 children, many of whom attend nearby Hybla Valley Elementary, one of the poorest schools in the county.

Edelmira Moran, an Audubon resident and mother of a kindergartner at Hybla Valley, said she wished her child attended school with more affluent students who could inspire others to perform better.

“In other schools . . . they can see the other students and want to make a difference in themselves,” said Moran, 32, who came to the United States from Mexico 10 years ago. “In Hybla Valley, it’s 90 percent Hispanic. What the problem is, I think, is the style of life is all the same.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/in-fairfax-county-kindergarten-classes-school-systems-future-comes-into-focus/2014/06/28/1ced10d2-f25e-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html

LV Mom
Jul '14

Lady Jayne, same article the Tea Party site copied from the Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/in-fairfax-county-kindergarten-classes-school-systems-future-comes-into-focus/2014/06/28/1ced10d2-f25e-11e3-914c-1fbd0614e2d4_story.html

LV Mom
Jul '14

lady jane, lv mom and iAnimal:

this is true, and it is time to wake up and see what effects the uncontrolled influx of illegal immigrants is having on our infrastructure. here's the source, not tea party, not the post, but a school system update page:


"close to 40 percent of the Class of 2026 requires additional English instruction, among the most ever for a Fairfax kindergarten class."

http://www.schoolinfosystem.org/category/curriculum/


here's some more:


"NEARLY 40% OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA REQUIRES ADDITIONAL ENGLISH INSTRUCTION
JULY 1, 2014 LEAVE A COMMENT
at Rees Shapiro
The kindergartners of the Class of 2026, who finished their first year in Fairfax County schools Wednesday, constitute the largest and one of the most ethnically, culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups of students the county has seen, a fact that school system administrators say could pose significant challenges in the decade to come. 
Long an enclave of predominantly white, middle-class families with a top-class school system, Fairfax has experienced a dramatic demographic shift in recent years that is nowhere more obvious than in the county’s kindergarten classrooms. The white student population is receding and is being replaced with fast-growing numbers of poor students and children of immigrants for whom English is a second language. "

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

sounds like a nice county to live in.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Again LV Mom, DACA regulations are for pre-2007 immigrants who have been here a decade and fulfill the other DACA requirements.

Not exactly amnesty for anyone crossing the border post 2007.

And, as far as I can tell, Obama did not break the law.

The current situation of holding these kids crossing the border and immediately raising their hands to be put in detention is solely the problem of Obama following the boneheaded law the Republicans sponsored, voted for, and had their Republican President sign into law.

A law that again, Obama is following.

My point LV Mom, is that you don't know what you are talking about when you repeat: "Here in the U.S., how can our government simply choose not to enforce existing laws?" and then toss these issues out.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

That's 40% of kindergartners... your original post claimed 40% of elementary aged school children. Big difference.

Go back to Lyndhurst, NJ 1925 (or whenever it was overrun by Italian immigrants who eventually displaced the "REAL" Americans). What percentage of kindergartners do you think required additional help with English back then? I'm guessing a lot more than 40%.

Plus, aren't conservatives always bitching about how "these people need to learn the language"? Now you're going to complain about having to teach it to them, too?

ianimal ianimal
Jul '14

yes, kindergärtner's, didn't mean to mislead anyone, but you missed the point sir, it's about overburdening an infrastructure that cannot handle the uncontrolled influx of illegal immigrants.

from the article:

The rising enrollment — the overall student body has surged by more than 22,000 since 2004 — is not sustainable at the current funding level, schools officials said, which could intensify already contentious battles for tax dollars with the county’s Board of Supervisors. School Board member Ted Velkoff (At Large), chairman of its Budget Committee, said the increasing number of immigrant families in Fairfax has affected — and will continue to affect — the school system’s bottom line.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Brother dog where in the articles did they mention the increase of immigrants were "illegal" immigrants?

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Based on the abysmal command of the English language by those who were born here, I think the infrastructure has been failing for decades. The same people who are bitching about immigrants not speaking the local language are the same ones who can barely speak or write it themselves.

Fix your own house people!

emaxxman emaxxman
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Hey Cooter! How about we pick up some beerries!

emaxxman emaxxman
Jul '14

Saying Fairfax has a funding problem is like saying Hunterdon is going under.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

ianimal, yes, those here legally should be required to learn English. Those here illegally and their anchor babies should be sent home. This is why we must have control over immigration. Open borders create chaos and cost billions.

The demographic changes in Fairfax are likely to have long-term implications for the school system: Most of this year’s kindergarten class will spend the next 12 years in county schools. Schools officials believe that the challenges that come with a less-affluent and less-prepared population will exacerbate the system’s struggles with a widening achievement gap for minorities and ballooning class sizes.

During the past five years, costs for English language instruction increased by more than $18 million, and elementary school teachers say they spend an increasing amount of their time on remedial education.

Like Fairfax, school systems across the region have experienced rapid increases in the number of Hispanic students as well as the number of pupils who qualify for subsidized meals. In Montgomery County, more than 35 percent of students receive free or reduced-priced meals, compared with 22 percent in 2000. Poor students now account for 68 percent of the kindergarten class in Prince George’s County, and 3 in 10 kindergartners this year received additional English instruction.

“We’re all ESOL teachers here,” said Principal Mary McNamee, noting that literacy has become central to the school’s curriculum.

Velkoff, the School Board member, attributes part of the rapid growth of Hispanic families in Fairfax to controversial policies in neighboring jurisdictions that he said were hostile to immigrants.( illegal aliens and their anchor babies)

As a result, class sizes have grown in certain areas of the county, frustrating parents, Epstein said.

Such families “are getting fed up and sending their children to private schools,” she said.

LV Mom
Jul '14

MG, Obama chose not to enforce current laws when he enacted DACA. Too late to reverse, imo, but he is still doing nothing to stop the illegals from coming here, costing taxpayers billions.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/09/Obama-My-Amnesty-Programs-Not-Luring-Misinformed-Parents-to-Send-Kids-to-US
President Barack Obama does not believe his temporary amnesty program for illegal immigrant children has exacerbated the border crisis even though the number of illegal immigrant kids crossing the border spiked the year after he unilaterally enacted the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in 2012.

Obama, though, conceded that parents who were sending their children to America from Central America were "misinformed." As Breitbart News has reported, even though "White House officials have gone on a public relations campaign to tell Central Americans that they will not receive amnesty, many illegal immigrants have said they traveled to America believing the Obama administration would never deport them if they made it across the U.S.-Mexico border."
And the number of illegal immigrant children crossing the border spiked the year after Obama enacted DACA in 2010:
Yet, as the Monitor noted, the following year, when Obama enacted DACA, "the number jumped to 13,625," and at least 50,000 have entered illegally since October of last year. Officials estimate at least 150,000-160,000 more will try next year.

LV Mom
Jul '14

http://therightscoop.com/houston-black-woman-goes-on-epic-rant-about-unaccompanied-illegals-why-cant-they-go-back/

epic rant on illegal aliens

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Emaxxman,

Infrastructure has been failing for decades because the US is becoming too populated and overrun by foreigners/immigrants. More people MO problems . Look at main street in beloved Hackettstown as another shining example ? Dirtier each year that passes ! Rarely ever do you see anyone who looks like they are willing to purchase anything walking around there these days. Than everyone wanders why places go out of business ? The people you do see walking don't want to purchase anything and they actually chase a good part of the population away.

Ashley Cole
Jul '14

For those actually interested in the facts: (LV Mom, BD, you are excused).

Why are so many children pouring across the southwest U.S. border? The answer is partly U.S. law, said a Texas congressman on CNN’s State of the Union on July 6, 2014.

Candy Crowley, CNN’s host, asked Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, "Why are they coming in such numbers? What do you think prompts these numbers right now?"

Cuellar answered, "If you're a Mexican, you get sent back. Mother, kids, adults, you're sent back, but if you're from a noncontiguous country like the Central American countries, then the law says that you are going to be held, (and) Health and Human Services, they're going to place you. That’s the law that we need to change right now."

We looked into the claim and found that Cuellar wasn’t crossing any lines.

With an influx of about 52,000 child immigrants at the border since October, the conversation has shifted to explanations. Which brings us to the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008. Some have cited it as the catalyst for the increase in illegal immigration.

President George W. Bush signed the law on Dec. 23, 2008; it received bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate as a measure to combat human trafficking worldwide.

The law was never intended to encourage mass immigration from noncontiguous countries. But the law’s Section 235 did change the policies and procedures for handling unaccompanied alien children.

Section 235, entitled "Enhancing Efforts to Combat the Trafficking of Children," requires humane treatment of minors crossing the border from foreign nations. It also mandates "safe and secure placements," calling for careful consideration when placing unaccompanied minors in residences within the United States.

The law lays out one procedure for child immigrants from contiguous countries, like Mexico and Canada, and another for children from noncontiguous countries, like El Salvador or Honduras.

Child immigrants from contiguous countries are processed for immediate return to their home country. In all other cases, the children are placed under the responsibility of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. These children are placed with family or in other residences while they await their immigration court date. Long story short, they get to stay in the United States.

The law seems to assume that alien children from noncontiguous countries were likely to be the victims of human trafficking, and it guarantees these minors access to legal counsel and child advocates.

Experts said Cuellar was right, and the law was never intended to allow immigrant children from Central America to remain in the United States.

"Representative Cuellar's characterization is mostly right," said Dan Cadman, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies. The law "has actually fueled an industry in the smuggling of minors. Contrary to intent, it has proven to be an inducement to wholesale smuggling of minors from noncontiguous countries."

The House GOP task force, assembled by speaker John Boehner to address the immigration crisis, issued a statement this week calling for changes to the law. "We agree with the president that (these children) must be returned to their home countries in the most humane way possible and that will require a revision of the 2008 Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act."

On July 9, 2014, Cuellar said that he is introducing legislation to make the repatriation of minors from noncontiguous countries easier and faster by revising the law.

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

Yankee is right, while a Republican sponsored law, it did have bipartisan (remember that from your childhood?) support and the current influx is an unintended consequence of parents in noncontiguous countries being told (by profit taking traffickers) that the kids can get in. Obama is just following the law Bush signed when he detains these kids. The law was intended to keep kids safe.

Perhaps before we think about ourselves, we should think about this poor current batch of kids. Parents are spending thousands to get them here away from their current lives; probably everything they have. The kids are alone, taking huge risks, just to get away from their current environment. How bad does it suck where they are for parents to take this risk? It is a horrific tale but we need to move fast to turn them away quickly and safely, and spread the news that our doors are not open so don't come and take this risk, lose their lives savings, only to be returned at some point.

We need to send these kids home, but let's have a heart, take care of them, and move quickly to resolve the situation with as much compassion as we can. They are kids and we are ultimately sending them back to hell.

DACA does not apply here since it covers only up to 2007 illegal immigration by kids who have spent a decade here, are educated, and have no criminal record, but certainly could be advertised by traffickers to lure more kids here (as LV Mom continuously makes the same error). IF DACA was illegal, then Boehner can just add it to the lawsuit, but he hasn't has he.

I say again to LV Mom: do you really want to deport these kids who have passed High School here and have been here for at least a decade? Only the most heinous of crimes don't have a statute of limitations, the longest limitation is ten years; the average is probably less than half that. Again LV Mom, is this how you want to spend our money in deporting these kids?

I think Coburn has one thing right; the current situation could be fixed in a week if Congress desires to and can remember how to pass any legislation. So far Congress has passed 14 bills this year. Of those, 6 are disaster relief/debt coverage/vet cola, 4 are Smithsonian management/commemoratives, 3 are extensions, and nothing is of consequence or new. I would say Congress can't chew gum and walk at the same time, but frankly, they can't do either to begin with.

So let's cut to the chase.

If you look at the things Obama has done, has spearheaded, you will see, especially early on in his Presidency, how he has made numerous concessions to the right. Don't believe me? Then why is the far left so upset with him? Crikey, he extended the Bush tax cuts. That's as bad as G. Bush Sr. raising taxes.

If you look at Congress, since 1973, each session passes an average of 597 laws. Since Obama, Congress has passed 324 laws per session. Since the Tea Party, that average dropped to 226. That estimate includes a steady state for the last half of this year, a conservative estimate since legislation normally drops off at end of session. So, since the Tea Party, the amount of legislation has dropped about 66% off the average. Congress has stopped functioning since the Tea Party got there, quantitatively. But there have been over 50 attempts to appeal the ACA if you call that working.

You can blame Obama, but these boys won't do anything productive, much less work with the other side on anything.

Eric Cantor took a moderate stance on the immigration supporting a process for undocumented immigrant kids to gain legality. Outspending his opponent, in a year the Tea Party has lost, he lost.

What chance is there of Republicans doing anything to pass immigration reform?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

I don't see the reason why they need National Guard troops on the border. It's not like children are sneaking across the border trying to evade capture. Just the opposite they are looking and seeking out the border patrol to give themselves up. Does America really need that picture of National Guard troops, guns drawn on a bunch of six-year-old. These children, come from countries more dangerous than any Middle Eastern country . And the reason why these countries are so dangerous is America's insatiable appetite for drugs.

dantheman
Jul '14

http://www.kpho.com/story/25982202/mother-of-sergeant-killed-by-illegal-immigrant-writes-obama#.U7_XDfkOHhI.facebook

MESA, AZ (CBS5) -
The mother of a fallen Mesa officer is writing President Barack Obama regarding illegal immigrants in the U.S.

MORE
Mesa Police Officer Brandon Mendoza
SLIDESHOW: Brandon Mendoza remembered as 'iconic' officer


Continue reading >>
Mary Ann Mendoza's son, Sgt. Brandon Mendoza was killed after an illegal immigrant was driving the wrong way on the road and hit Mendoza's vehicle head on.

Mary Ann Mendoza released the following letter:

"President Obama,

"I am writing this letter to you regarding illegal immigrants.

"As a tax paying, law abiding citizen of the United States, I WANT my voice heard on this issue. My son, Sergeant Brandon Mendoza, an officer who was with the City of Mesa, Arizona police department, was killed in a tragic head on collision on May 12, 2014 by a wrong way driver on our freeways. This man happened to be an illegal immigrant, was in this country illegally, convicted of previous crimes, no Social Security number, no valid driver's license BUT he had purchased a vehicle and registered it to drive in Maricopa County Arizona.

"I had my son's life STOLEN from me by a man who didn't value his life, was 3X the legal limit drunk, was high on Meth, drove for over 35 miles THE WRONG WAY on 4 different freeways and had NO BUSINESS BEING IN THIS COUNTRY!!!

"The Federal Government knew he, Raul Silva Corona , was an illegal immigrant when he was convicted on crimes in 1994 in Colorado. The prosecutors were "lenient" on him and several charges were dismissed. When he was convicted of these crimes and 1994 and the government knew he was in the country illegally, why wasn't he deported? Why are any of these illegal criminals in this country ??

LV Mom
Jul '14

"Obama, though, conceded that parents who were sending their children to America from Central America were "misinformed."

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Why are so many children pouring across the southwest U.S. border?

because they can, that's why

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

good point dantheman LVMOM do you think America's insatiable appetite for drugs.has anying thing to do with the Violence in those county

oldred
Jul '14

Adults behaving like adults...

Three of the world's richest men are calling on Congress to pass legislation that would overhaul the nation's immigration system and provide some sort of path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.

Casino magnate and conservative donor Sheldon Adelson joined Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett and former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates to criticize House Republicans, in particular, for failing to address current policy, which they said "borders on insanity."

"Whatever the precise provisions of a law, it’s time for the House to draft and pass a bill that reflects both our country’s humanity and its self-interest," they wrote in a New York Times op-ed published Thursday night.

The likelihood of any immigration reform bill moving through the House is currently slim to none given opposition from conservative members and Speaker John Boehner's (R-Ohio) unwillingness to bring it to the floor without the support of a majority of his caucus. Despite those obstacles, the three men, who are worth a combined $184.3 billion according to Bloomberg, urged Republicans to listen to reason.

"A Congress that does nothing about these problems is extending an irrational policy by default; that is, if lawmakers don’t act to change it, it stays the way it is, irrational," they added. "The current stalemate -- in which greater pride is attached to thwarting the opposition than to advancing the nation’s interests -- is depressing to most Americans and virtually all of its business managers. The impasse certainly depresses the three of us.

"Signs of a more productive attitude in Washington -- which passage of a well-designed immigration bill would provide -- might well lift spirits and thereby stimulate the economy. It’s time for 535 of America’s citizens to remember what they owe to the 318 million who employ them."

Read the whole op-ed at The New York Times

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Well, if it "borders on insanity," perhaps the Republicans are afraid of crossing the border into sanity and being declared illegal aliens. It is a foreign land for the Tea Party :>)

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

oldred, I think the U.S. can put an end to the drug smuggling in a heartbeat if they really wanted to. Both Republicans and Democrats are a huge disappointment to me.

But I do believe we also have to hold these other countries accountable. Mexico, a country with some of the harshest immigration policies, is allowing, and even encouraging passage to the U.S. There should be some form of punishment doled out to these gov'ts.

LV Mom
Jul '14

" I think the U.S. can put an end to the drug smuggling in a heartbeat"
you must be on drugs?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

"the three men, who are worth a combined $184.3 billion according to Bloomberg, urged Republicans to listen to reason."

yeah, the richest guys are out there demanding more cheap labor, Bill Gates wants college educated computer science engineers from India and China at 10 cents on the dollar so he can lay off and fire Microsoft's US citizens who work for him for 80 - 120 K per year, (right Darwin? . . . you know what's going on . . . )

Hathaway wants more slave labor brought in from south of the border to fuel the businesses he owns at the lowest non-union labor costs he get get away with. He has no shame when it involves HIS money.

they are both sharks who prey on the weak, and they want others to check their consciousness and find their humanity? gimme a break . . . . . this is hypocrisy squared.

walmart, target, big box stores, big companies like General Electric, Capitol One, AT&T, HP, Johnson and Johnson and many, many others, are all the same, they all want more immigrants to hire for the cheapest rates they can get away with. period. where's their humanity? where?

it's past time for you libs to wake up and smell the coffee, if it's about humanity, why don't we let in all of the starving kids who are living in gang infested violence all around the world, I mean really where's YOUR humanity?

kids are dying, starving and living in fear of their lives from gang violence, war and religious extremism all around the globe:

Africa
Indonesia
India
Pakistan
Syria
Palestine
China
Ukraine
Bosnia
Romania
Beirut
Iraq
Chicago
Nigeria
Detroit
Somalia
Washington DC
Yemen
Afghanistan
Camden

and many many others . . . . . .

why don't we just open our hearts and our borders and let them all in here? how come we only care about central america kids? are other kids lives not worth as much? if it saves even one life . . . . . . . . .

if we believe this with all of hearts, then shouldn't we take all of the children in? and give them free housing, food, health care, schooling and a college education so that they can be layed off by a big company for a cheaper worker over seas and then stay on long term unemployment benefits or better yet qualify for section 8 housing and get life long disability payments? can't we do that if we all just open our hearts? what could go wrong?

how many more?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Let's see, I cross the street down town ,and do not use the cross walks,and a cop is driving by, he can give me a ticket for Jay walking ! It is illegal to do so,but an illegal can cross the border,with a child, get on a bus,go where ever they want,and nothing happens.This is to simple, I must be missing something? I guess that we can"t break the law, but they can! Do I have this right? Why all the drama,it will not change,not till 2016, so relax,turn off the news,did anyone see that Social Security, now is a Government Benefit, who changed that. He is slowly changing this country,soon he will be King.Got to go, a bus just pulled into Hackettstown,It says to America on it ! HMMMM!


""why don't we just open our hearts and our borders and let them all in here? how come we only care about central america kids?""

maybe because they are the only ones making the treck over here. I'm sure if a raft filled with small kids from one of the countries you listed washed up on US shore, they would get the same treatment as these kids are getting... We wouldn't just push the raft back into the ocean and send them on their way.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Tin foil hat time.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

You can't argue with stupid.

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

+BrotherDog. I think you got to the libs. this time to make them choose one or the other roads

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

The source reads much better than the cut and paste version above...

A “talented graduate” reform was included in a bill that the Senate approved last year by a 68-to-32 vote. It would remove the worldwide cap on the number of visas that could be awarded to legal immigrants who had earned a graduate degree in science, technology, engineering or mathematics from an accredited institution of higher education in the United States, provided they had an offer of employment. The bill also included a sensible plan that would have allowed illegal residents to obtain citizenship, though only after they had earned the right to do so.

Americans are a forgiving and generous people, and who among us is not happy that their forebears — whatever their motivation or means of entry — made it to our soil?

For the future, the United States should take all steps to ensure that every prospective immigrant follows all rules and that people breaking these rules, including any facilitators, are severely punished. No one wants a replay of the present mess.


We also believe that America’s self-interest should be reflected in our immigration policy. For example, the EB-5 “immigrant investor program,” created by Congress in 1990, was intended to allow a limited number of foreigners with financial resources or unique abilities to move to our country, bringing with them substantial and enduring purchasing power. Reports of fraud have surfaced with this program, and we believe it should be reformed to prevent abuse but also expanded to become more effective. People willing to invest in America and create jobs deserve the opportunity to do so.

Their citizenship could be provisional — dependent, for example, on their making investments of a certain size in new businesses or homes. Expanded investments of that kind would help us jolt the demand side of our economy. These immigrants would impose minimal social costs on the United States, compared with the resources they would contribute. New citizens like these would make hefty deposits in our economy, not withdrawals.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/11/opinion/sheldon-adelson-warren-buffett-and-bill-gates-on-immigration-reform.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=1

LV Mom
Jul '14

I always wonder how many of us would be here now if our ancestors were turned back at the shore or border of this great country? Maybe we should feel the worst for the American Indians since we stole their country from them? So much for America being a melting pot of people.

Redwing
Jul '14

BD, Camden, Chicago and DC are great examples at how our gov't fails to prevent gangs, drugs and gang violence. Why not bus all of those kids to Fairfax and Hackettstown where everyone is welcome and money is not an issue..

LV Mom
Jul '14

Redwing, some of my relatives were turned back at the border. They knew then that unhealthy or non productive individuals would not be a benefit to our country. There's nothing wrong with our best interest being at the heart of immigration laws.

My children are all grown, but if they were living in Fairfax today with all ESL teachers in the public school they attended, they would be in private school. Which is exactly what is happening there.
I don't know why some of you don't move to Dover if you think it's so great to have your town taken over by illegals.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Anyone remember Elian Gonzales? Seems the left didn't mind sending him back. This mess gets worse by the day. Everyone can be very self righteous when we don't live on a border state and have to deal with what these people are dealing with. I don't care for myself it's my children and grandchildren I fear for. This is not the country I grew up in. And if you think I have a tinfoil hat on so be it.


I remember Elian his dad was still in Cuba and that is why he went back. His dad had custody of him

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/382457/trump-illegal-immigrants-are-getting-treated-better-vets-andrew-johnson

“You know, the only one we can’t get back into the country is our Marine,” Trump said on Thursday, referring to U.S. Marine reservist Andrew Tahmooressi, who mistakenly crossed in to Mexico with firearms and is being held there by the Mexican government. “I mean, everyone else is flowing in from Mexico and the Marine is stuck in prison.”

Additionally, needy veterans continue to suffer from through the widespread mismanagement at the Department of Veterans Affairs, he said, “but I guarantee we’ll take care of these [immigrants] if they come.”

Trump warned of the consequences of allowing recently arrived illegal-immigrant children to stay in the country while top-notch students from other countries are denied entrance to the U.S. or must go through the legal process.

“This influx is killing the country,” he said. “It’s killing the country.”

LV Mom
Jul '14

simo "Anyone remember Elian Gonzales?"

His mother died getting him here, but of course the dems give in to communists, it's what dems do....

I'm absolutely positive had republicans been at the helm, all dems would be against it. Janet Reno was one of the worst things to happen to Washington

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/11/elian-gonzalez-its-americas-fault-my-mother-died/

Elian Gonzalez, who made headlines 14 years ago when his mother died while journeying from Cuba to the United States — sparking an international custody battle — said America was to blame for his loss.

LV Mom
Jul '14

How many democrats feel about BHO I guess...


"Mr. Gonzelez was only 6 years old when he was found at sea, clinging for life to a raft. His mother drowned during the trip, but he was rescued by U.S. authorities and placed for a time with relatives in Miami. His father, Juan Miguel, ultimately won the right to bring him back to Cuba.
Mr. Gonzalez has recently spoken out about his return to Cuba, praising the decision and expressing gratitude. The Christian Post reported he said: “Wherever I go, there’s always a child, an old woman that comes to me and wants to meet me, not because I am famous, but because they suffered with my family. Fidel Castro for me is like a father. I don’t profess to have any religion, but if I did, my god would be Fidel Castro. He is like a ship that knew to take his crew on the right path.”


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/11/elian-gonzalez-its-americas-fault-my-mother-died/#ixzz37DukKkAw
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

LV Mom
Jul '14

All i can say is LV Mom gets it ! Big hug from me any day of the week !!!!!!!!!!

Ashley Cole
Jul '14

LV Mom-When you start quoting Don Trump as an immigration expert I know you're grasping at straws. I just want to ask you "What would the radical socialist,Jesus, do with this immigration mess?" Would He be standing at the border to block their way and then put the signs away and go to church? LOL!

Redwing
Jul '14

I so confused by LV Mom., the Republicans wanted to bring Elian's dad to America and give them both residency. You think that was right? The boy came here illegally, why would Republicans want to let him stay?
And the boy wanted to go back and as your link shows was happy that he went back so I'm really confused

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

Darwin, I have no doubt that you are really confused. The boy is really happy he was taken back to a dictator who he now believes is like a god who knew the correct path for him. I'm sure you can relate.

I did not comment on whether or not he should have remained here or be deported back to his father, who, of course, was under pressure from his communist leader to bring the boy back; I simply stated that had that occurred under Republican leadership, I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Redwing, I also quoted, Adelson, Buffett and Gates, correctly I might add.

"For the future, the United States should take all steps to ensure that every prospective immigrant follows all rules and that people breaking these rules, including any facilitators, are severely punished. No one wants a replay of the present mess.

We also believe that America’s self-interest should be reflected in our immigration policy."

As for WWJD
http://www.biblestudytools.com/nlt/romans/13.html
Bible Study ToolsBible VersionsNLTRomansRomans 13
Romans 13 (New Living Translation)View In My Bible

1 Obey the government, for God is the one who put it there. All governments have been placed in power by God. 2 So those who refuse to obey the laws of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Yea, and that tune would be "Oh Canada, Our Home and Native Love....."

Nobody is illegally crossing their borders.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

No sorry to disappoint you LV Mom but it didn't matter to me who which party was President at the time. i am not a Dem or Rep, so i do not blindly agree with one party or another. In the case of Elian, i thought he should be returned to his father, who sadly was the only living parent the boy had left. It didn't matter to me that they were from Cuba or NY, it was a custody issue and not a political issue. Who should have custody of the boy, his father or another relatives??

"The boy is really happy he was taken back to a dictator who he now believes is like a god who knew the correct path for him. I'm sure you can relate."

How can I relate to that? I don't live in a dictatorship country, and I am an Atheist so I don't believe anyone is God

Also, I am not for these current kids to be allowed to stay here, i just think we should treat them as humans (and not rats) while they are here while we find the best and most humane way to get them back to their parents. If that makes me a Democrat in you eyes so be it, i just thought it made me a human being.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

LV Mom- I am sorry to hear some of your relatives were turned back at the border for being "unhealthy or non productive individuals" that would not be a benefit to our country. With this kind of thinking I wonder when we should start shipping out our unhealthy and non productive citizens back to their ancestors country of origin? Slowly we can weed out the undesirables and shut down the border. Maybe we can also send back the Statue of Liberty. Screw that "give me your tired and poor" idea. What a wonderful country we could have then. LOL!

Remember this country is stronger because of its diversity.

Redwing
Jul '14

Yes, Elian's father had custody of him that's why he went back. Don't the parents of all these under age children who are coming here illegally also have custody of their children? I'm confused as to the difference except for the political party that's in charge.


Oh come on, you can't see a difference in the Elian story and the current situation?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

MG, If they bring back the Draft watch the boys go north in droves. Nothing worth fighting for with out freedom and the Constitution not being upheld.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

No, please explain. Seems to me Elian was a "refugee" and this is what the president is telling us these kids are.


LV Mom says: 1 Obey the government, for God is the one who put it there. All governments have been placed in power by God. 2 So those who refuse to obey the laws of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow.

I guess that includes Hitler, Stalin, Idi Amin, et al?

Must be a party every day at your house!

yankeefan yankeefan
Jul '14

Once again Simo ignores facts and logic in favor of bashing the "other side". Pathetic.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jul '14

Excuse me. I was asked if I couldn't see the difference and I asked to have the differences given. I'm waiting.


Elian Gonzalez's only living parent and legal guardian was asking for his return. Not doing so would have been tantamount to kidnapping.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jul '14

Then I guess you can't see the difference between Elian's story and the current situation. That's because there isn't one. And who knows what you are saying re parents, custody, whatever since no one has a clue where these kid's parents are.

Elian illegally immigrated to the US, an unaccompanied minor from a noncontiguous country
Elian went to court
Elian was deported to his home country, the extenuating circumstances of US relatives here wanting him being outweighed by a waiting communist father at home.

Current status is that unaccompanied minors from noncontiguous countries are immigrating to the US
They will go to court
Unless extenuating circumstances, they will be deported to their home country.

The main difference is the process of detention that children from contiguous countries do not follow (not the case here) and the NEW Republican sponsored, Republican signed law that calls for a deportation process (just like Elian got) instead of immediate return for kids from noncontiguous countries.

So there is no real difference in the process of Elian and current kids from noncontiguous countries. The difference would be kids from contiguous countries.

Like I said before, perhaps the Republicans can get this law right the second or third time around if they just might get off there proverbial brains they are sitting on and get something done instead of blowing hot air and politiking.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Perhaps the liberals can do the same. I'm pretty sure there's been some" politicking " by the "no photo op" president. Well, whatever the outcome is it's all on his watch.


Well Simo, you can throw the general misuse card but I was specific as to the Republican error prone actions and remediation inactivity on this specific issue.

The President already had a proposal on the table and has signaled ready willingness to change the current law covering illegal alien kids from noncontiguous countries.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

LV Mom-I guess Mr Bundy should be expecting some punishment from God for disobeying the law. Oh I forgot, he doesn't recognize this government. So that's the way out for all these Christian protestors. LOL!

Redwing
Jul '14

"? I'm confused as to the difference except for the political party that's in charge."

Same political party is in charge as they were with Elian. Sorry for a silly thing like facts to get in the way of a good rant.

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

Sorry about that. Sometimes I make mistakes Darwin. That didn't come out like I meant it. I'm done here. Like I said we'll sit and wait and see what the outcome of this mess is. Along with the VA scandal, IRS scandal, Bengazi, and the list goes on and on.


http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/07/11/Exclusive-TSA-Allowing-Illegals-to-Fly-Without-Verifiable-ID-Says-Border-Patrol-Union

Illegal aliens are being allowed to fly on commercial airliners without valid identification, according to the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC).

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Once again Simo ignores facts and logic in favor of bashing the "other side". Pathetic.
Gadfly

Singling out Simo for mimicing the normal posting behavior of HL regulars in this thread? Seems to me your comment should be directed to others as well.

Justintime Justintime
Jul '14

So, we are forced to prove and have medical insurance,the illegals don't have to become citizens,but receive free medical insurance,from the people who have to pay for medical insurance.Oh yeah,and are citizens,and pay taxes.So know I get it,SNAFU!


Re: US Southern Border being over run?

And then there's JIT, the man on the third side, that lofty side of pure logic, searching, searching, searching for the root cause...... :>)

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

I guess we are all pathetic unless you agree with their side and their version of the facts. History will be the judge of this situation and well as all the others. The emperor plays golf while Rome burns.


Simo,

Elian Gonzalaz having a father, and that father demanding his return, isn't anyone's "version of the facts". It's simply the facts.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jul '14

Thanks for your consistency mg. we can always count on you to punctuate the lowest common denominator...
Eh, who needs grey matter anyway since our society seems to think being an ass is the best way to interact with each other, right?

Gadfly, all we can do is share information. There's not much we can do to make others believe it.

Justintime Justintime
Jul '14

Question? What do you think would happen if it thousands of people decided to over run the border of N. Korea, Russia, Syria, Somalia, Iran or other mid eastern countries???


Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Uh oh, the JITs goes snarky name-calling in search of a laugh; that's a big bang.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Judy, FYI, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon currently have a HUGE influx of refugees from Syria, and to a lesser extent from Iraq.


Switzerland, My second choice of Countrys to move to, just said no more refugees. There business leaders are having a fit. The political leaders see whats going on in Europe.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Let's bus all the illegals to Washington until Obama does something! I think the boys on the hill will figure this out real quick, when its in there back yard.So last night on several news stations,doctors were asked,are the people coming over the borders medically checked out.Response, was, we do not have enough doctors,and the illness they may have could be TB,a new strain, with no cure.They also have several other medical problems, that can effect all of us.The doctors that can do an examine,are very upset,because there is nothing they can do.This is some mess,again the tail is wagging the dog,we look bad to other countries, we have no leadership! Rome is burning!


"Let's bus all the illegals to Washington "


this is a good idea. Murrrieta California could charter a bus, round up a busload that he feds just dumped on them and then have it drive to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

the WhiteHouse. have the bus stop at the WhiteHouse and let them all off right there.

Rick Perry could do the same thing, round up a couple of busloads, have the Texas Rangers drive them to the WhiteHouse

drop them right at the presidents doorstep then leave

good idea

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Perplexed? Really?

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/07/14/yolo-county-officials-perplexed-by-unusual-spike-in-whooping-cough-cases/

Yolo County Officials Perplexed By Unusual Spike In Whooping Cough Cases

But health officials are concerned, because Yolo County is seeing a spike in whooping cough cases stronger than the rise in other California counties.
“It’s most concerning because infants can become seriously ill and die from pertussis,” said Dr. Constance Caldwell with the Yolo County Health Department.
She’s puzzled by the spike, because nearly 95 percent of kids in Yolo County public schools are vaccinated.

LV Mom
Jul '14

How about sending them to school with the Obama girls.


"Frontline health professionals that say that they're seeing people with active TB who are coughing up blood, who are short of breath, who are physically in the throes of active TB and they are communicable,'' George said.

"Not everybody shows symptoms right away, but they could have the disease before it actually manifests or shows itself. So they're just as infectious.''

Just as serious is the fact that many of these sick youngsters are being jetted around the country to be placed in foster homes.

"They are putting them on commercial airliners. [The] TSA has been ordered to stand down and allow these children and adults to get on planes without ID. So they're arriving in Georgia, they're arriving in Maryland they're arriving all over the country,'' she said.

"In Maryland, there was an immigrant child who had TB and the parents just got a letter from their school stating that their children have been exposed. There's going to be a lot more letters like that going out if parents are lucky.''


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/border-crisis-health-threat/2014/07/14/id/582623#ixzz37YIIc300
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

LV Mom
Jul '14

Not long before they will be in the cocina cooking at your favorite restaurant. I see it now " the Whooping Cough Burger " Your posts are very informative LV mom . Unfortunately half the population will continue to keep their head up their you know what. They will scream racism every chance they get.

jerseycash5
Jul '14

LVMOM America has survived a great civil war World War I World War II Korea Vietnam and countless other wars. Do you think or in your case the lack of thinking America will be brought down to her knees from the toddler brigade from Central America. Kind of stupid isn't it to think a bunch of kids who could not even get into a PG-13 movie will destroy America.

oldred
Jul '14

It's not the kids that will destroy America. They are just the pawns in all of this. Getting into a PG-13 movie seems a little simplistic.They are going to all be covered by Obmacare, go to our schools which our property taxes for and become takers of every government program we have. Perfect "next generation" for the likes of what's running the country now.


It is unfortunate jerseycash, because inevitably, it's not the liberal elitists that will suffer but those who think they are so noble and great and vote to destroy this country.

simo, you can bet these kids won't be bused anywhere near BHO or his ilk.

oldred, brought to our knees, no, but a lot of American children will become sick thanks to your hero. And most of those "kids" are over 13..

LV Mom
Jul '14

No Oldred. Its Multiculturalism destroying the Country. We had among other things a work ethic that allowed us to set some goals for our self, with a possibility of succeeding. Today its more a survival. It is now the rich and the poor. No middle class. The leaders are mostly rich and they take care of them selves and there business friends.
When the crash hit we found out how the business's were playing with smoke and mirrors an nobody went to jail. The politicians said every one deserved a house when they didn't but the Government made them give loans. When things hit the fan, who did they bail out, the business and banks. Investors that took a chance and were bailed out through Company's being bailed out but the middle class got nothing. They lost are gone now and so is hope.
It's not the kids causing problems. It's the culture we have now of survival, Government dependency, depression that helps lead to drugs that the kids are being used for today. IMHO

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Boy LVMOM you get your talking points right from the conservative manifesto don't you. rule one of the manifesto make people afraid fear mongering is 1 of your best weapon's did you hear those kids are all diseased ridden. They will infect everyone were all going to die.

simo
If you you what you were talking about you be dangerous. One of the first rules in Obama care is you must be a American citizen

oldred
Jul '14

I guess if he said it, you must believe him oldred..

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/01/HHS-Report-1-295-571-Obamacare-Enrollees-May-or-May-Not-Be-Legal-Citizens

A devastating new Health and Human Services (HHS) Inspector General report released on Tuesday reveals that the Obama administration has yet to determine whether 1,295,571 of the over 8 million Obamacare enrollees are U.S. citizens lawfully in the country.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Oldred I have a bridge I'd like to sell you!! I wish I lived in that little world of yours


A lot of our kids are and will be sick because their American parents cling to the falsehood of vaccinations causing autism. That's a bigger problem than getting it from these refuges.

Redwing
Jul '14

You guys do realize these kids are being sent BACK HOME, right. The first wave of deportations took place yesterday with more to come in the next few days. These kids are being sent home. It takes time to figure out who they are and where they are from. In the meantime the US is being humanitarian and trying to find them a place to stay until they can send them back.

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

When are they being sent home. Busloads and plameloads are being dropped off in various states only to be told to show up at a hearing at a later date. To date less than 20% have showed up to their hearing. This dates back to last October and over 50,000 have entered since. Also, none of the States were notified that these children were being dropped off. There is also a current backlog of over 400,000 undocumented people awaiting hearings and god only knows how many of them will show up. This is a crisis that needs mmediate attention but Congress is heading off to their summer vacation.

kb2755 kb2755
Jul '14

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/382835/paul-ryan-immigration-bills-dead-least-year-joel-gehrke

Paul Ryan: Immigration Bills Dead, At Least for This Year

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Without a plan to secure the border there is no way the Republicans will support it. Bills were passed in 1986, 1996 and 2006 to secure the border but Congress never funded them.

kb2755 kb2755
Jul '14

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/shock-video-illegals-arrive-in-bus-and-shop-at-walmart-with-ebt-cards/

Illegals Arrive in Bus and Shop at Walmart With EBT Cards

We all know that this has been happening, however, the sheriff of her town had said that they weren’t allowing any illegals to be shipped in, so it would appear as if the Obama regime is once again placing undue burdens on the states and not even letting them know what’s going on. What’s worse is that in the comments under the video she posted to Facebook, Sylvia said that when she was in line behind them that they were using government-issued EBT cards to pay for their purchases.

LV Mom
Jul '14

CNN on the Border Crisis: ‘You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet’

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/382779/cnn-border-crisis-you-aint-seen-nothing-yet-ryan-lovelace

A columnist for CNN says that when it comes to the influx of unaccompanied alien children at America’s southern border, “You ain’t seen nothing yet.”

“We should stop looking for an endpoint. This story has no end in sight,” writes Ruben Navarrette at CNN.com. “We will be dealing with this crisis not for weeks or months but probably for years.” Navarette explains that it’s foolish for U.S. officials to believe that any one plan of attack will solve the problem and this crisis has no simple solution or finish line.

As for the first group of illegal immigrants deported back to Honduras, he says not to expect them to even bother unpacking. “They will soon return to the United States,” he writes.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Fear mongering or truth oldred? Are they lying about setting up a TB clinic? Would you want your children going to school with illegal 20 year olds?

http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/26016031/lynn-officials-illegal-immigrant-children-are-stressing-city-services

Latham says that because of the age of some students, reportedly between 16 and 20 years old, they were placed in the ninth grade. Twenty years old is the cut off for high school entrants.

But a report by the National Review Online claims at least two illegal immigrant students in Lynn who claimed to be minors are actually much older adults. That article names two people who were released to family members in Lynn by federal officials.

In a statement to FOX 25 about the article, the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition (MIRA) said, "To focus on a tiny minority of outliers in this group is to risk performing a grave disservice to these young people in need."

"We have no proof that they are much older. So they will come to school. They came, I believe in April or May and enrolled usually in the system as ninth graders," Latham said. "Many of them do two years in the ninth grade."

Though it's difficult, school administrators do attempt to verify a student's age.

"But we are limited by the law," Latham said.
The law states Lynn schools cannot deny enrollment to anybody solely on the basis of not having paperwork. The law also says students have to be vaccinated.

And if any student doesn't have insurance, the city of Lynn picks up the tab for administering the injections.

Public Health Director MaryAnn O'Connor said she estimates the department has seen a 200 percent increase in vaccinations over the last couple years. O'Connor has also had to hire two additional part-time staff members and had to start a tuberculosis clinic for a huge spike in cases over the last two years.

LV Mom
Jul '14

That video was useless. Why not tape them in the store using the cards can't tell anything in that video.

So she supposed "interviewed" one of them, he could speak a word of English but he then said they're staying at china cove?

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

So another illegal rapes a 9yr old in Arizona , the illegal was deported 4 times before,great job at the border,and our justice system ! Why not just turn them around,you say the kids are sick and hungry.There are many kids and adults,and vets, sick and hungry in this country! We need leadership so bad,wait got to go, another bus is coming into town.


Harry Reid said yesterday are borders are secure. That's good enough for me. Harry has never been anything but honest and forthright. Not sure what planet he's living on.


I think we should send the illegals to space,let them land on any planet,start a new country,set up there own rules, government,there own president , and we could check on them every hundred years.The key is no return flights home,but they are allowed to cross any borders they want, just not ours.You see they want the world given to them,well here is a brand new world,go for it.Lets vote on this! Vote=Yes !


Wow, there have been some really great suggestions here for what we should do with undocumented immigrants. Unfortunately, the republicans refuse to consider reforming immigration laws, so we're stuck with the broken system we have now. It's funny that nearly everyone agrees that the way we handle immigration now doesn't work, and yet the house Republicans refuse to fix it. Too bad they don't play well with others.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jul '14

takes two to tango gadfly, the dems and the whitehouse are just as culpable, how come they can;t work out a compromise?

lack of leadership that's why.

where is the bipartisanship? why blame just one side? is it because you are a registered democrat? or is it because you and the media keep grading this failed president on a curve like he was some inner city school kid who keeps getting passed along to the next grade?

i think Texas should round up several bus-loads of these 'migrants' who are dropped off by the feds and bus them straight to the white-house front gates and drop them off.

it is the people's house is it not? maybe they can get a room there?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

If Harry Reid said that, and it sounds like he did, he is senile.

But Gadfly is right and now, instead of fixing the current kid problem, they are taking the opportunity to get press and pass bills fixing it but with enough distasteful riders to choke any moderate much less liberal.

Hopefully, they will come around soon and just at least fix the current issue since broad-based immigration reform seems unobtainable.

Meanwhile for HLers to be mixing in adult-based crimes and saying "see the kids caused this" is disingenuous.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

When things are better on one side of a border, any border, it is normal for people to try and cross. You can be pretty good at stopping it, or not so good, but the issue is not going to go away. You cannot make all the borders, land, sea and air, "secure". Resulting resentment is normal also.

As an example, here is an article about Haitians who have crossed, over the years, over the border into the Dominican Republic, where things are better than in Haiti:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/12/30/haitians-dominican-republic-immigration-ruling-leaves-community-stateless/7XLAA20GHC4RV5No9fw26M/story.html


Let's keep an eye on this one...

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/feds-to-open-50-million-resort-hotel-for-illegal-children-complete-with-tennis-courts-sauna-pools/

FEDS TO OPEN $50 MILLION RESORT FOR ILLEGAL CHILDREN – Complete With Tennis Courts, Sauna & Pools
The Palm Aire Hotel and Suites is set to be sold to Baptist Child & Family Services (BCFS) operating under a federal contract, pending local government approval, according to reports from Weslaco, Texas where the hotel is located. Weslaco is a few miles north of the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County.

The resort hotel for illegal alien children is reportedly the ‘first in the nation’.

According to a Hidalgo County commissioner, the BCFS contract for the Palm Aire Hotel and Suites is an annual one worth $50 million per year. It is not part of the $3.7 billion emergency funding for the illegal alien invasion requested by the Obama administration as the bill hasn’t yet passed but it is a good indication of where the money will go.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Texas should round up several bus-loads of these 'migrants' who are dropped off by the feds and bus them straight to the white-house front gates and drop them off.

it is the people's house is it not?

maybe they can get a room there?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

The Fish stinks from the head down! That 3.7 billion, will get signed while we sleep,by super pen ! Why can't the first lady and her girls, baby sit these kids coming in ? Then they could have one of her great lunch programs,or maybe she could show them, how to grow a garden !


Connecticut rejects request to house illegal children -


HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - Connecticut officials have rejected a federal request to temporarily house up to 2,000 immigrant children from Central America at a mostly-vacant facility built for developmentally disabled adults.

http://www.myfoxny.com/story/26030566/connecticut-rejects-request-to-house-children

even ultra-blue Ct doesn't want these kids in their state,

I say take them all to the white-house gates, the peoples house, the white house

they got rooms

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

maybe you should mention we should send these kids to the White House BD one more time... you've only said it 4 times now.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

how about your house darwin? You got an extra room don't you?

just open up your heart, and your own house, take in a kid or two and maybe actually walk your own talk,

Rick Perry could use the Texas Rangers to bus these children to Washington DC and drop them off right at the WhiteHouse, it's a good idea.

it is called the people's house for a reason, right? let's start using it as such.

The libs in Ct have already said no, not here, so where then?

Where should they go?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Why don't they go to Dover, they would feel at home, there relatives have been there for years !


I'm just curious who you all pray to on Sundays? I agree that this is a major problem but the way you speak about these people is atrocious. Let's fix the problem and not punish people looking for a better life. All you "patriots" need to realize that we are an immigrant nation. Maybe you all should try to pray for a solution instead of shipping them back to a murder zone? You send your missionaries to their country to spread the Word but spit on them when they come here. You "Christians" should be ashamed. Do you really think that they are all "BAD" people?

Redwing
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

"I'm just curious who you all pray to on Sundays?"


The Flying Spaghetti Monster can fix this...

May all these immigrants be forever touched by his noodly appendage.

Blessed are the Pastafarians.

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jul '14

Christians are in the minority also.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/feds-to-open-50-million-resort-hotel-for-illegal-children-complete-with-tennis-courts-sauna-pools/

FEDS TO OPEN $50 MILLION RESORT FOR ILLEGAL CHILDREN – Complete With Tennis Courts, Sauna & Pools - I am not sure how trustworthy the source is

skippy skippy
Jul '14

Funny how the press doesn't think his legal status is important, a murder is murder, what difference does it make if he's here illegally, right?!

RELEASED ALIEN FROM BORDER CRISIS ARRESTED FOR ALLEGED MURDER, KIDNAPPING IN TEXAS

LUBBOCK, Texas—An illegal immigrant who was released by U.S. authorities with a Notice to Appear has been arrested for the alleged murder of a woman and kidnapping of children on U.S. soil. The alleged crimes occurred after the man was released.

The AP identified the illegal alien as a “suburban New Orleans man” who faces a second-degree murder charge after his girlfriend was found bludgeoned to death in a bathtub in Louisiana. The man was arrested in a Katy, Texas trailer park with three children. It is unclear if the are his or if they are the same children he used to get U.S. authorities to release him with a Notice to Appear.
*****The AP did not inform their readers that the man was an illegal alien.*****

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/07/16/Exclusive-Released-Alien-from-Border-Crisis-Arrested-For-Alleged-Murder-Kidnapping-in-Texas

LV Mom
Jul '14

LV Mom-With all due respect, I think you need to broaden your choice of news sources. Breitbart and Fox have one point of view. There's got to be a more middle of the news source. Both sides just print stuff with their slant just to stir up people and get ratings.

Redwing
Jul '14

That's the problem, Redwing, MSM is not reporting it. The article I linked above was reported by the AP but they did not report that the murderer was a recently released illegal.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Reading this, one has to wonder why the heck parents are sending there children here...if you believe these "facts". Looks like either way Texas needs to take care of it's legal citizens first.

http://www.texasobserver.org/disease-threat-immigrant-children-wildly-overstated/

Before demonizing undocumented children, we should look at the facts: The vast majority of Central Americans are vaccinated against all these diseases. Governments concerned about health, and good parents investing in their kids, have made Central American kids better-vaccinated than Texan kids. We fear them not because they are actually sick, but because of powerful anti-immigration narratives that link foreigners to disease.

Consider, for example, Guatemala. According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Guatemalan kids are more likely than Texans to be immunized for most infectious diseases. Guatemala has universal health care. Vaccines are 100 percent funded by the government.

By comparison, one in six kids in Texas is uninsured, and even insured families often must pay for vaccination. That means that many Texas kids fall behind on vaccinations, or miss them altogether when their family can’t afford a doctor’s visit. Other families refuse vaccination.
More than 90 percent of Central Americans are vaccinated against TB, according to the WHO. The vaccine, called the BCG, is imperfect. It’s used in countries where TB is still common, but some cases will break through the vaccine’s coverage.

Americans are not routinely vaccinated. According to the state health department, the 1,233 cases of TB that occurred in Texas in 2012 were mostly along the border and in prisons. The disease has stayed crouched in those centers of poverty because it flourishes where people live in close quarters and suffer from diseases like alcoholism and HIV, which knock down their immune defenses. Eradicate poverty, and TB fades away.

LV Mom
Jul '14

just open up your heart, and your own house, take in a kid or two and maybe actually walk your own talk,

walk my own talk??? You mean me saying i think our Federal Government should treat these kids humanly and care for them while they are in our country until we can get them back home... that "talk" ????

How radical of me.

And my wife and i would have no problem taking in a child in need

darwin darwin
Jul '14

So LV Mom, you are saying that whenever someone is arrested for a serious crime, that person's citizenship/immigration status is required to be part of the story?


Protesters mistake YMCA campers for immigrants

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-nn-na-immigration-oracle-protest-kwasman-20140715-story.html

oops

LeRoy Grimace LeRoy Grimace
Jul '14

jd2, yes, why wouldn't it be newsworthy? Who doesn't think it's important to know what kind of people are really crossing our borders? Besides the MSM.


Mind-Boggling Stats on Illegal Immigrants With Criminal Records the Press Rarely If Ever Publishes

ICE conducted a total of 368,644 removals.

- ICE conducted 133,551 removals of individuals apprehended in the interior of the U.S.
--- 82 percent of all interior removals had been previously convicted of a crime.

- ICE conducted 235,093 removals of individuals apprehended along our borders while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S.

- 59 percent of all ICE removals, a total of 216,810, had been previously convicted of a crime.
--- ICE apprehended and removed 110,115 criminals removed from the interior of the U.S.
--- ICE removed 106,695 criminals apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S.

- 98 percent of all ICE FY 2013 removals, a total of 360,313, met one or more of ICE's stated civil immigration enforcement priorities.

- Of the 151,834 removals of individuals without a criminal conviction, 84 percent, or 128,398, were apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S. and 95 percent fell within one of ICE's stated immigration enforcement priorities.


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2014/02/04/mind-boggling-stats-illegal-immigrants-criminal-records-press-rarely-if-#ixzz37gMdpKde

LV Mom
Jul '14

So if a serious crime is committed by an illegal immigrant, it is important to mention, because "it's important to know what kind of people are really crossing our borders", then wouldn't a serious crime committed by a citizen or legal resident tell us what kind of people it is that live here legally? Wouldn't that crime then reflect badly on you (and me) in exactly the same way?


jd2, it has nothing to do with how it "reflects" on you or me, it is simply stating the facts.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Redwing, I think you should start a mission,go down there, ask them who they are,and if there Christians? Then you can speak to the mother in AZ.about her 9 yr old, who was just raped by an illegal, who has been deported 4 times ! Wake up,pray for this country, while we still have it.


We can't talk to them. According to this administration they have a right to privacy. We're footing the bill( $250 to $1000 per day per child) for all of this mess but they don't have to let us see what's going on. So much for transparency. Sounds fishy to me.


This is not a wavy of people that just happened to be coming this way . This is a well planned , well financed, well organized, invasion, coming to your town in a Trojan Horse.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Not just stating "the facts",LV Mom. Selecting a fact and drawing an erroneous conclusion from it, through faulty logic. Breitbart telling its audience what it wants to hear.


"Not just stating "the facts",LV Mom. Selecting a fact and drawing an erroneous conclusion from it, through faulty logic. Breitbart telling its audience what it wants to hear."


But yet nobody bats an eye when the MSM finds it necessary to pore over the details of someone's voting record (i.e. right/left wing) or "likes" on Facebook when they commit a crime to put their slant on the suspect. It's actually usually the first question every nosy person asks...

Kill someone? Well, we *HAVE* to find out if he voted for Bush or Obama (even though voting is completely legal)... oh, but shhhh... we don't want anyone to know this other criminal was an illegal immigrant (which actually has some merit because it exhibits prior disregard for the law).

Mark Mc. Mark Mc.
Jul '14

Kids laughing as they were driving by! I like how he assumed and then recanted quietly!

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/immigration-border-crisis/bus-blunder-arizona-gop-member-mistakes-campers-migrant-children-n157621

Christine Christine
Jul '14

Breitbart reported the facts regardless of the conclusions that might be drawn.

LVMom
Jul '14

Well I see now the fear merchants are now telling people that the children coming across the border maybe caring the ebola virus even though there has never been a case of ebola in the Americas North Central or South When asked for a comment from the CDC the Dr. in charge of infectious diseases called it incredibly idiotic

oldred
Jul '14

From the department of "And now you know the rest of the story"

What was conveeeeintly left out of the story was HOW ice systematically removes illegals, while never explaining the "priorities" noted in LV Mom's pasting (which is basically from the ICE website too."

From the ICE Website:

" ICE's role in the immigration enforcement system is focused on two primary missions: (1) the identification and apprehension of criminal aliens and other removable individuals located in the United States; and (2) the detention and removal of those individuals apprehended in the interior of the U.S., as well as those apprehended by CBP officers and agents patrolling our nation's borders.

In executing these responsibilities, ICE has prioritized its limited resources on the identification and removal of criminal aliens and those apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the United States."

Well go figure that ICE has targeted criminals and then caught.......wait for it......wait for it.......CRIMINALS.

Now you know the rest of the REAL story.

Never ceases to amaze me how LVMom blindly reads, agrees, and pastes without thinking: "I wonder?"

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/07/exclusive-feds-struggling-to-cope-with-medical-breakdown-at-the-border/

Medical screening breaking down

Skippy Skippy
Jul '14

jd2 "Not just stating "the facts",LV Mom. Selecting a fact and drawing an erroneous conclusion from it, through faulty logic. Breitbart telling its audience what it wants to hear."

Omitting the facts is doing the exact same thing. How about I get all the facts and draw my own conclusion. What erroneous can be drawn from reporting all the facts?

LV Mom
Jul '14

Exclusive: Feds Struggling to Cope With Medical ‘Breakdown’ at the Border


http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/07/exclusive-feds-struggling-to-cope-with-medical-breakdown-at-the-border/

The director of refugee health in the federal Health and Human Services Department “has identified a breakdown of the medical screening processes at the Nogales, Arizona, facility,” according to an internal Department of Defense memo reviewed by ABC News. The “breakdown” a systemic failure of the handoff of these children between CBP and HHS.

Two unaccompanied children were flown from Nogales to California despite having 101-degree fevers and flu-like symptoms, according to the Department of Defense memo. Those children had to be hospitalized.
The memo said pointedly that officials in charge of moving the immigrants from Border Patrol processing centers to Health and Human Services facilities are “putting sick [fevers and coughing] unaccompanied children on airplanes inbound for [Naval Base Ventura County] in addition to the chicken pox and coxsackie virus cases.”
The document said three other kids were in the ICU at local hospitals in California, and two of them were diagnosed with strep pneumonia.
Less than a week later, that same Ventura Naval Base suffered an outbreak of pneumonia and influenza among the unaccompanied minors inside the shelter.

*****The big health risks are among these children, not to our communities.”***

So says MSM. I guess we shouldn't worry about our own children....

LV Mom
Jul '14

oldred, and God forbid the U.S. does see it's first case of ebola, I'm sure you'll blame Bush.

LV Mom
Jul '14

" http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/shock-video-illegals-arrive-in-bus-and-shop-at-walmart-with-ebt-cards/

Illegals Arrive in Bus and Shop at Walmart With EBT Cards"

LMAO turns out this shock video of illegals that just arrived in our country buying goods with EBT cards was actually migrant workers of a local farm.

Patterson Farms in China Grove, NC confirmed the bus was theirs and they sent their workers to the Walmart for supplies. All workers are here through a fed gov't program H2A that are issued temp green cards for the harvest season. The farm has been doing this for the past 20yrs!!!! LOL

darwin darwin
Jul '14

LV Mom: "How about I get all the facts and draw my own conclusion. What erroneous can be drawn from reporting all the facts?"

There are millions of facts. Due to time and space, only a very tiny percentage can be reported. This is a problem for all news organizations. While all have unavoidable biases, some try to be fair.

In this particular case, it appears Breitbart is *selecting* this fact for publication because it fits the narrative that you and others want to hear, which is that illegal immigrants are bad people.

In standard news releases, omitting a suspect's citizenship status when he is illegal, and omitting it also when the suspect is a citizen, is balanced.


The kind of facts MSM thinks is important.

http://news.yahoo.com/rumors-swirl-around-migrant-kids--fueling-local-backlash-225719392.html

“Where are these kids getting the money to get to the U.S. border?” he asked in an interview in his loudly decorated office in City Hall, complete with leopard print couch and shag carpet. “We know that the United States is saturated with drug cartel people—are they the sponsors?”

LV Mom
Jul '14

Jd2, I disagree. Whether a violent criminal is here illegally or not is an important fact to many. It's a crime that should have been prevented.

LVMom
Jul '14

Bottom line there is no good news coming out of these border towns or anywhere else for that matter.


http://madworldnews.com/video-busloads-illegals-shopping-walmart-ebt-cards/

LOL i like at the very bottom of the report they put the updat that the peope in the video were not illegals, but migrant workers from a local farm here
LEGALLY,

good job LV mom getting the 'facts"


"It is now suspected the individuals in question were migrant workers that were in the country on a temporary basis."

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Yes, it's a problem, simo.


http://savingtherepublic.com/blog/2014/07/busload-illegals-nc-go-shopping-ebt-cards-walmart-debunked/

oops! i guess Sylvia Locklear in NC is not a credible source to get our news from.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/big-update-baptist-child-and-family-services-withdraws-bid-for-palm-aire-resort-video/

well i guess the illegals aren't moving into the resort afterall.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

you do realize that we *need* immigrants to this country to support people who want to retire, right? its either that or people start having more babies.

econ 101
Jul '14

Don't worry they will be having babies like rabbits, the more they have the more $$ they get,there was a store in this town, that would bring in a legal expert, and charge the immigrants $200.00 a person, to find out how to get all the entitlements.Great,everyone should come here by bus,get off, be protected, fed, clothed, medicine,housing,whatever they need ! Yes they would meet once a week, after business hours,plenty of people knew this, but it was legal,no harm in gathering.The same guy did this in Dover over twenty years ago,take a look at Dover.You know where this is going ! Times 50 states, they wont cross the ocean yet !


Backing up my previous writing,
This is a well planned , well financed, well organized, invasion, coming to your town in a Trojan Horse.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/fbi-cartel-members-accused-kidnapping-sc-man-24582696

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

"there was a store in this town, that would bring in a legal expert, and charge the immigrants $200.00 a person, to find out how to get all the entitlements."

Yeah, it's called H&R Block.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Thank you for the udate darwin. Good job Drudge. Wonder why it's not perfect for American homeless children.

"Now this…
Due to backlash the charity received after the story was posted on The Drudge Report, Baptist Child and Family Services withdrew it’s bid for the Palm Aire Resort.

The charity said it was disappointed and that the resort would have been perfect for the illegal alien children."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/big-update-baptist-child-and-family-services-withdraws-bid-for-palm-aire-resort-video/

LV Mom
Jul '14

you do realize that we *need* immigrants to this country to support people who want to retire, right? its either that or people start having more babies.
econ 101

I doubt these immigrants will be supporting anyone, more likely they'll drain all resources we now have.
Selective immigration is what is needed. Hopefully, the gov't is allowing as many Europeans to legally enter the U.S as it is illegals crossing the borders.

LV Mom
Jul '14

1. Close the border
2. Start deporting new arrivals immediately.
3. Allow those who have been here longer than 10 years and have legal jobs to apply for work permit. No amnesty.
4. Stop anchor baby program. Location is not enough to grant citizenship. At least one parent has to be citizen.
5. Demand e-verify for any business hiring workers (that Includes Donaldson Farms and Alstede farms ). That's right we know what you do !!!!!!!!!!
6. Enforce law against employers using illegals. (Large fines, make it not worth lower wages if you have to pay fines).
7. No social services, schooling, health care or free anything for illegals.
8. Deport any and all illegal criminals taking up jail space that are not accused of capital crimes.
9. Send Mexico(and all the other countries) a bill for the amount of money it takes to process deportations. Deduct it from the amount sent in foreign aid or from the debt we owe (like China).
10. Those with work permits must learn English and take citizenship test before being allowed to become citizens.

Ashley Cole
Jul '14

MS-13 gang members indicted for conspiring to bring drugs, murder to New Jersey

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2014/07/a_dozen_members_of_ms-13_gang_indicted_for_conspiring_to_bring_drugs_murder_to_new_jersey.html

“To achieve that goal Rodriguez-Juarez and other gang members struck an alliance with Mexican drug cartels in order to flood the streets of New Jersey and other states with cheaper West Coast drugs and to expand the gang’s influence in the deadly world of narco-trafficking.”

Permission to kill off rivals was granted from ranking members imprisoned in California with the help of cell phones smuggled inside, prosecutors said.

Alliances were made with criminal gangs like the Mexican Mafia, based in California state prisons, to supply methamphetamine and other drugs at discount prices to MS-13 gang members in New Jersey and along the East Coast, Fishman said.

In November 2013, three gang leaders in El Salvador “greenlighted” the murder of a rival gang member in Hudson County – a slaying foiled by agents of the FBI who led the investigation, prosecutors say.

Five defendants from New Jersey accused of taking part in the alleged murder plot are scheduled to appear in U.S. District Court on Friday.

Among them is Carlos Andrew Valdez, 27, the leader of a northern New Jersey faction of MS-13 known as “Hudson Locotes Salvatrucha” and Marvin Garcia-Cruz, 31, the leader of a Hudson County-based clique known as “Pinos Locos Salvatrucha.”

LV Mom
Jul '14

Our own, beloved Gov. Christie seems ready to take some of the kids:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/07/17/christie-n-j-may-consider-housing-kids-from-southern-border-influx/?hpt=hp_t2


Re: US Southern Border being over run?

I wonder why he wants the kids nobody wants.........

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

I wish the Gov Christie would not get involved in this and not bring any of them here to jersey send the all back no mater how young or old

ow conected to the ow conected to the
Jul '14

New Jersey has one of the highest hispanic populations in the U.S., I'm sure many will make there way here one way or another.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Number 7 in Latino population, 1.6M,
Number 8 in population ration, 18.1% of our population
Mostly reside in northeastern counties and Main Street Hackettstown.

30% are from PR; do we have an issue with them too?
Uh oh, 60% are native born Hispanics
Only 14% are from Mexico.

So, yeah, folks from Central America will definitely cling to folks from PR and Mexico. They all look and sound alike, right?

Lots more to feed your fancy here: http://www.pewhispanic.org/states/state/nj/

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

MG stopping letting facts get in the way of silly rants.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Our Gov. Mr. Christie,will bring them to Mendham where he lives,and they will open there arms to these cute little People.HMMMMMMMMMMM,Anything for a vote,take care of the shore people , Oh yeah there not headlines anymore,please stop the BS,the only thing thats going to change, is the date.


the Governor of Maine should bus these kids right to the front door of the White house and drop them off there:

Maine governor bemoans move of eight child immigrants to his state -


Maine Governor Paul LePage blasted the White House on Tuesday for placing in his state eight children who tried to cross the border illegally.

The administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has been struggling to find shelter for the wave of unaccompanied child immigrants from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras that have been arriving at the Mexican border, which is expected to reach 90,000 people by September.

"It is wrong for the federal government to force a higher burden on the people of Maine to pay for those who come to our country illegally," the Republican governor said in a statement. "We cannot become a state that encourages illegal immigration. We simply cannot afford it."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/22/us-usa-immigration-children-maine-idUSKBN0FR2I220140722

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Here we go.

ignatz ignatz
Jul '14

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/22/house-task-force-recommend-national-guard-border-f/

House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations

Skippy Skippy
Jul '14

Just as I predicted Republicans do nothing about illegal aliens They would rather bitch cry and complain. President Obama gave them exactly what they asked for. A Bill that would hire thousands upon thousands of new border patrol agents more judges to speed up the process of deportation. And of course as predicted Republicans cannot be seen actually working with the president to get the problem solved refuse to vote on the bill. It is so much easier to complain about the problem and blame the president than to actually do something about it. Hoping that complaining about it will get them a few more votes the president asked for I think it was $3.7 billion somehow the Republicans turned that into a blank check no he asked for a specific amount

oldred
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Hey oldred,

What was the Bill number that obama gave them? I seemed to have missed that one.

ignatz ignatz
Jul '14

well i say to those who want to open our borders to all comers, , when will you guys take in one or two of these destitute, abused, abandoned , sick, hungry, and poverty stricken children yourselves? use a spare room in your own house, open your doors, your arms, dip into your savings and buy some more groceries, some clothes, and then happily pay higher school taxes (about 12K per year per kid) for the public school tax increases.

just open up your hearts, where is your empathy? your humanity? where??

(crickets)

start walking your own talk by taking into your own house a central american kid, or bus them straight to the WhiteHouse front door and drop them off right there

they call it the 'People's House' for a reason do they not?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

AMEN,BrotherDog

ignatz ignatz
Jul '14

Broken record

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

1,504 immigrant children placed in New Jersey


During a town hall meeting this week, Republican Gov. Chris Christie said he had not received any notice from federal officials about children being placed in the state.
“At this point, we’ve had no federal notification that any of these children or adults have been sent to New Jersey. But we’re going to continue to monitor that every day,” he said Tuesday.
He also complained about how little control governors were being given over whether children would be sent to federal facilities or charitable organizations, which are not under state control.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/24/us-places-1504-undocumented-children-in-nj/#ixzz38VfJsAns
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

LV Mom
Jul '14

I knew this was a slippery slope. I knew they were looking to take over.

We must fight giving Governors complete control over Federal facilities. They are even trying to control the Charities now. First the governors whined to get the Fed to move things to the states saying they needed the jobs in their state, now they want to take control in a governor take-over of the federal guberment.

That's why we need to keep BIG guberment facilities in DC so that the governors can't take over control of the army, fbi, cia, etc.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

rick perry has the right idea in deploying the national guard in Texas, the Texas National guard should round up the illegal immigrants, and then Perry should use the Texas Rangers to escort them to the Whitehouse.

that's a good way to let our government know what is going on. Obama refuses to go the border to see what is going on, so Texas (and New Mexico and Arizona and California) should transport the illegal immigrants to him so he can see them in person.

without borders there is no country. the president of the United States is supposed to secure our borders. Obama refuses to do it. why?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

BrotherDog. Do you understand that there is a federal law that dictates how the federal government has to handle juvenile immigrants? It seems that either you don't understand that or you want to ignore it so that you can bash the president despite the facts.

Gadfly Gadfly
Jul '14

It's all a political game - Obama want's impeachment proceedings brought against him. I guess banking on the Bill Clinton Impeachment effect to save his Presidency but got news for him - he ain't no Bill Clinton...it[s all a game to these people & your getting played!

"Washington — President Obama will go ahead with a “very significant” executive action on immigration after the summer – a move that may well trigger impeachment proceedings against him, senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer told reporters at a Monitor breakfast Friday.

“The president acting on immigration reform will certainly up the likelihood that [Republicans] would contemplate impeachment at some point,” said Mr. Pfeiffer, who has been at the Obama White House since its inception.

A lot of people in Washington laughed off Sarah Palin’s call to impeach the president for executive overreach, Pfeiffer said, but “I would not discount that possibility.” Polling shows strong support for the idea among the GOP base, he said, adding that House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio has opened the door to the possibility with his lawsuit against Obama. "

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/monitor_breakfast/2014/0725/Obama-will-take-executive-action-on-immigration-after-summer-adviser-says


At least Boehner is not dumb enough to make this guy a victim - Republicans will win the Senate this fall & it's over for him,,,he knows it that's why he has checked out already.

He has lost the Independents - he has lost everybody except the Progressive Socialist's like Oldred & Google who will defend him to end...cause that's what Socialist's do.

Hey he tried to create a Progressive Movement in the country - it failed - now he doesn't care. Let him make a jackass out of himself the next 2 years - personally i will enjoy it.

Good times!


RU, I share your opinion re Boehner's motives and that the Republicans will carry both the Senate and House this fall. Obama will then be completely minimalized and can go play all the golf he wants - who cares. 15 and 16 will be good years and make it relatively easy for Republicans to take the WH and country back from the brink. I do disagree about the googleman however, he's just out there on planet Krypton and loves to spout useless and irrelevant drivel just to stir the pot. Oldred is just a bottom of the bottom 50 percenters, period.

Extownie
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

RU, that's such a crock. First, I may believe in pitching in to make people's lives better using government programs: I figure that's what America is all about and America has been great for me so why not give some back and give someone a helping hand. But when it comes to capitalism; I am gung ho and I bet much more invested in the concept than you and most of HL. It is possible to do both.

Your party has become all about nothing. Doing nothing, saying anything, and willing to let the country fail even to the point of taking actions to make it fail. This is not Reagan's party anymore; it has become a party of exclusion and small in vision and actions. Keep going and we will see who does what in the next midterm.

Second, look at what your party has done to make this President and the country fail. The 112th Congress was the least productive in history. The only thing apparently worse is this Congress, the 113th. Look at the chart, it is a record of failure that starts with the Tea Party's ascension to a wedge power broker.

Congress makes the laws of the land; this Congress does not work. Even if the President is the worst leader in the world, this Congress is on the books as faring even worse. And it all started with the Tea Party victories in the midterms over three years ago. Your party can't even agree in-house, many times they have overturned their own speaker at the last second with disastrous results.

Your party obstructs everything anyone wants to do. They can't put up any of their own bills that has a chance of passing. Their major accomplishment is 54 repeals of ObamaCare, a new record of failure. They refuse any action on immigration, VA emergency, you name it. They are even willing and supporting efforts to cancel 34 states worth of health insurance over a word. They would rather ruin the country, hurt it's citizens, and blame the President than help the country.

Consistently they have two-faced hypocritical actions. They blame Obama for not cutting costs; then they blame him for the Sequester cost cuts. They blame him for immigration and then blame him for asking for funding to attack the problem. They blame him for the VA emergency, but again stop any bills that would help alleviate the problem.

I do not enjoy Presidential failure by either party, it hurts the country. And this President has not failed, he has been let down just like the rest of us. Congress has failed, you can see it by the lack of any work, any progress, nothing but hot air.

Impeachment. Sure, makes sense if you are a Tea Partier. We will spend money while even if guilty, there is not even enough time to do anything productive besides more of what your party is doing so well: NOTHING. How long did it take to impeach anyone and how much time is left. Idiots hurting the country for political gain.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/monitor_breakfast/2014/0725/Obama-will-take-executive-action-on-immigration-after-summer-adviser-says

apparently this will continue at least another month

Skippy Skippy
Jul '14

MrG, stop with the bla!me everything on the Republicans garbage you keep spouting. What we have in Obama is a failure of leadership, not willing to get both sides to come together and compromise. Remember when he called both sides to sit down to discuss the stimulus, he started by telling John McCain, "you lost". What a pompous ass. He set the tone right there, basically my way or the highway. They rammed the healthcare law down our throat without one Republican in Congress voting for it, buying off Senators to get it passed. My favorite Nancy Pelosi quote, " we have to pass it first to see what's in it". Don't you think that there are plenty of Americans who don't, like where this country is headed. I'm no fan of Republicans either but they are trying to hold the line on this progressive "government will take care of you" mentality we are headed for. Low information voters and an apathetic public who have no clue what is going on, living in their own little world, spells trouble for this country in the future. As far as I am concerned all Politicions suck and only look out for themselves and how they can get reelected. It is time for term limits, no more two year terms for Congress as they start running for reelection not long after their sworn in. Change it to four years and can on serve a maximum of three terms. Same for the Senate, two six year terms and your out. These were not to be lifelong jobs. I know many will say we have term limits because you can vote them out but unfortunately we have a public for the most part that doesn't have a cluie or care and thus it is money that plays a big hand in who gets elected. The whole system is broken and needs to be changed but their is a fat chance of that happening. What ever happened to being the most transparent administration in history, I guess I must be going blind because I'm not seeing it.

kb2755 kb2755
Jul '14

Google - I'm Libertarian and the Republicans suck as much as the Democrat/Socialists but will give you credit you hit all the Democrat/Socialist talking points - good job!

IMO - the Federal Government has 2 jobs National Defense and maintaining Federal Highways - that's it.

All the rest including Social Security is FDR Socialist Tripe.


Re: US Southern Border being over run?

+1,000 You are very smart RU One of the most authentic things Reagan said was, beware of the Government coming and saying I am here to help you. There not here to help you, there here to own you. Now they can tell you what to buy. Imagine that, and they say we are a freedom loving nation. Where not even a nation with out any borders. That,s an oxymoron.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Regarding the productivity of Congress, I'd be very interested to see what categories of bills our past legislators had passed. For sure, the priorities of years past are different than the priorities of today. IMO "Productivity" is an erroneous concept for lawmaking, at least outside the perspective that laws=personal benefits.

http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2014/01/16/congress-in-2013/

See the pie chart in the middle of the page for an example. Anyone know if this kind of data can be found for previous Congresses?

kb2755, we are far too along the socialism path to really do anything about it. We have no choice but to see it to it's conclusion. Only when the consequences of our past economic folly's hit home will you see people wanting to hear what you have to say. Remember, today the public *expects* redistributive policies to give them things that politicians have told them they deserve. Immigrants, like US citizens, know a good thing when they see it. Realistically, the immigration patterns of today are exactly what we should be expecting to see based on our national benefits programs. The story of Robin Hood, I'm sure, is understood internationally. It's not factually correct given the current 99%/1% divide, but it is a nice story.

And while I have the floor, I'll divert the thread for a moment by tossing in a seemingly unrelated but correlated set of data, brought to mind by this and the recent thread about an early riser using power tools. This adds yet another punctuation mark on the consequences of how our unrestrained monetary system works to empower us (via "productive" laws) to exert ever more control over our fellow citizens:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/07/the-leader-of-the-unfree-world/374348/

Note the second chart in the article. It's far too coincidental to be meaningless, the correlation of increased incarceration rates to the removal of monetary restraint in the early 1970's...

justintime justintime
Jul '14

KB and RU are so focused on stereotypical branding generalizations they delude themselves. I showed you the productivity charts: feel free to look inside to see what laws are being proposed and how people are voting. When the obstruction is and lack of compromise. Like I said, I am a capitalist of the first order but still see the need for govt. to have programs to give people in need a hand up.

I listed many examples, quantification, and the best these folks can come up with is:
"stop with the bla!me everything on the Republicans garbage you keep spouting." (actually I listed numbers and examples....) Then you spout your sound bytes which are incorrect and didn't happen that way, but hey, it's in your political legend tool box so it must be true. For example, Obama didn't say that to McCain and what he said was: "You don't like a particular policy or a particular president? Then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election. Push to change it. But don't break it. Don't break what our predecessors spent over two centuries building. That's not being faithful to what this country's about." But that's too deep for a sound byte.

There's "holding the line" and then there's take no prisoners obstructionism. Look at the facts: I listed numerous current events where the Republicans have stopped all actions: immigration, veterans, etc.

Obama may not be the leader to fix this broken house, but he has taken a lot of in-party grief for spearheading numerous compromise bills including Bush Tax Cut Extensions, the Sequester (another Republican team spirit disaster), and others. Meanwhile the Republicans continue on their "take no prisoners" strategy. I read the news today, oh boy:

Idaho GOP Senator Compares Health Care To The Holocaust
Iowa (tea party) Billboard Compares Obama To Hitler, Lenin
Maryland Republican Group Cites Health Care In Comparing Obama To Hitler
Maine Governor Says Obamacare Forces People To Pay 'The New Gestapo'
Republican Candidate For California Governor Compares Obama To Hitler And Stalin On Gun Control
Arizona Republican Rep. Barton compares Obama to Hitler

I am sorry; who is Obama supposed to work with?

KB, I do agree that it's time for Pelosi and Reid to go, their major benefit is experience with the rules, not how to use them appropriately. But when you look at how Republicans in Congress are spending OUR time, it's criminal. 52 ObamaCare repeals. What's the definition of insanity?

This is the one I love: "IMO - the Federal Government has 2 jobs National Defense and maintaining Federal Highways - that's it." Uh, National Defense is our LARGEST Socialist program and the founding fathers would be appalled. Federal Highways ---- another Socialist Program. But you would let FEMA, Parks, Libraries, etc. etc. etc. all just fade away. You don't have an answer, just some misguided dream.

OldGent: I actually agree with Reagan in that govt by it's very nature, like any organization, seeks to survive by expansion. While I believe in many govt programs, the need to have public monitor and control to avoid excesses in power and size is paramount. Sure, I thought the original welfare cuts under Reagan were bad, but changed my mind after seeing the results (although poverty did increase two years later). The program had gotten out of control. But monitor and control is very different from burn and destroy.

JIT: I agree, quantity by itself is not necessarily quality, but at these historic lows, one should smell a dead elephant. You can search on laws passed and see what was pitched, what passed and who voted for what. What passes today in appointments to the Smithsonian and low-level crap like that. What is pitched from the House is turds that will never fly, poison meant to inflame the base, not move the country forward.

Lastly, JIT, whatever do you mean: "Note the second chart in the article. It's far too coincidental to be meaningless, the correlation of increased incarceration rates to the removal of monetary restraint in the early 1970's..." 60% of Federal prisoners are drug related. Is that due to our fiscal system and policies?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Don't break what our predecessors spent over two centuries building. That's not being faithful to what this country's about.
That,s not what I hoped this county would be about. This socialist attitude only started with FDR IMO. Not centuries ago. I hoped it would be Freedom and Opportunity. Re distributing money and so many rules that hinder business opportunity is not what I hoped for. . More states rights was the norm., especially in education before the feds stepped in. Infrastructure was as well. As far as defense goes. The Constitution demands that be done. Sticking our nose in other countries is not in the Constitution. That's why they hate us. So we give them money to buy there love. Ha, Ha!!! That's not working out to well.
How is it going on the borders? That's in the Constitution. That's where defense starts. Look how long FDR thought about it before getting into WW2.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Socialism started with the first federal "public" anything. If by FDR, you mean the new deal; how was it before him. Think most people agree Hoover sucked and Coolidge and Harding before him all blew it setting up the worst financial disaster in history (before GBush). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States

Of course, FDR ranks highly. Sure, it's just WIKI and the liberal press but check out any ranking you wish.

The Constitution does not call for a standing Army nor defense as the largest budget item and HUGEST socialist program we have; it has a different set of guidelines.

You folks who want to destroy all federal programs make me laugh; you will be the first to lament their demise as you find out you need them to survive. Without Social Security, most of you just wouldn't make it since you did not save enough to live well even with the addition of SS.

So re-engineer, improve, fine-tune, tune up ---- sure. Destroy. Give me a break.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

"Without Social Security, most of you just wouldn't make it since you did not save enough to live well even with the addition of SS."
How do you make a blanket statement like that? How do you know the financial status of the people on this forum? It must be happy hour at the Babble house.

ignatz ignatz
Jul '14

It fits their narrative that's why.


Mg dose not understand how resourceful human beings are.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

MG "Without Social Security, most of you just wouldn't make it since you did not save enough to live well even with the addition of SS."

Yeah, yeah, some day MG will be saying the same thing about obamacare...yeah, we couldn't get good health care without it..

Imagine how much more we could invest without these gov't funded charities.

LV Mom
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Ignatz, you might be right; I was just playing the averages: "About 36% of workers have less than $1,000 in savings and investments that could be used for retirement, not counting their primary residence or defined benefits plans such as traditional pensions, and 60% of workers have less than $25,000" (USA Today -- very small survey) Or NPR: "Only 18 percent of Americans say they are very confident about having enough money to retire comfortably. But a little more than half of people say they're at least somewhat confident about it."

Maybe HL is different, maybe not. I don't know about you but I am one of the ones that will be dependent on SS even though I have a nice amount of savings. You have paid a lower tax rate for than last 14 than any other time since the 1950's; are you richer and better invested from that? Maybe you do need SS?

Yes, it (the facts) fits my narrative, that's why I have that narrative...... And if Americans were so well prepared, so resourceful, so blessed with our safety nets from charities, churches, and good Samaritans, why would we ever need or invent Social Security? It would be a very stupid thing to do to invent something that is not needed to begin with.

Social Security is NOT a stupid thing. SS is NOT a gov't funded charity; it is a "mandated pension fund" that workers pay into during their work lives to retrieve safety net benefits from in retirement. It is only a safety net, not meant to take that much nor give that much, just a safety net. If you want to risk your safety net ----- make some more money and risk that. Prudent financial people don't risk their safety net. Even the highest financial flyer, if smart, packs a parachute. If we take SS away, we will have millions of tragedies. Splat. Where will you be then?

Saying programs like SS make us socialists is as silly as saying the US is socialist. Or that buying life insurance is socialism, or any fund that you pay into to get future returns. It's addled logic as silly as saying you are not capitalists since you work since a pure capitalist is defined as one who only invests in the work of others thus using capital to create profit on the backs of others. Silly black and white thinking.

Capitalism: "an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state."

Socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."

But it makes you feel good to decry the bottom feeders as living well off your hard-earned taxes. As if all your financial problems would be relieved if only you didn't have to pay those taxes to support the lazy, undeserving, bottom feeders holding you back from financial freedom. If only you could have your SS deductions back, you would be rich.

Has the fact that you are taxed less today, and for the past decade, than at any time since the 1950's made you richer? Are you rolling in the extra cash since you have had over 14 years of profits to invest? Good thing you have SS............ :>)

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obama-immigration-20140726-story.html#page=1

"Amnesty, work permits for 5 million could be ordered 'within weeks'..."

Skippy Skippy
Jul '14

I don't know where you live MG but I'm paying more taxes than I ever have. Stop with your generalizations of everyone. But then again that fits your narrative


Those were federally taxes and your rate is the lowest it has been since the 1950's. Perhaps you should look at the chart. Since it has been that way since the Bush Tax Cuts, perhaps you did not notice. It is not a generalization, saying that just fits your narrative :>)

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Capitalism: "an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the Government."

Socialism: "a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the Government as a whole."

I changed two words in your definition. I trust my boss, more than I trust a politician. If I think my boss is not doing right, I can quit. If I don't think the politician is doing right, I am stuck with him. Capitalism is basic definition of Freedom.
You look at everything in this screw up country as it is today's climate. I look at things from what my parents and grand parents world was like. My father was intervened in a book . Life in the Forty's. He worked for a Company that belonged to the Rockefeller's. He speak's of all the things the Rockefeller's did for there employees. Then what happened in the late fifty s when the MBA's came on the scene and the worship of money became the norm. I even had a great job at that time. We built canning machinery. I was the greats machines ever made from the bottom up. Then the Government came in and and said we could not do business like were because it was not right. We put a machine in your plant. We maintained them and you only paid for the cans that were produced. The Government said we had to sell them on the market. It was not practical price wise possible to complete on the market. The MBA's decided, why do we need all this mess and sold all the plants and equipment off, took the money and started Prime America Insurance Co.
Now you have the rich and the poor are left for you to take in and control.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

Obama sneaks 760 illegal immigrants into Tennessee: “It’s unacceptable. No one was told,” says Governor


Dear President Obama:
I write to you to express my concern about the number of unaccompanied immigrant children entering this country and the failure of the federal government to notify states in which children are being released.

It is unacceptable that we became aware via a posting on the HHS website that 760 unaccompanied children have been released by the Office of Refugee Resettlement to sponsors in Tennessee without my administration’s knowledge. Not only was our state not informed prior to any of the children being brought here, I still have not been contacted and have no information about these individuals or their sponsors other than what was posted on the HHS website and subsequently reported by media.

Although solving the border crisis is a federal responsibility, this influx of immigrant children could have a significant impact on state and local governments. Therefore, we strongly believe that the state needs to be informed prior to any additional unaccompanied immigrant children being released in Tennessee, and we also need immediate answers to the following questions:
1. What was the process for determining that these children should be released to sponsors in Tennessee?
2. How did you locate and evaluate the fitness of their sponsors?
3. What medical screenings were the children given prior to their release in Tennessee?
4. What is the official immigration status of these children and their sponsors?
5. In what localities are these children now residing?
6. What are the legal requirements concerning the provision of services for these children while
they are in the state?
7. What additional information is available on these children, such as age and health status?
8. How long will these children be in Tennessee?

Tennessee is a diverse and welcoming state, and we also understand that this is a complicated issue. However, an influx of unaccompanied immigrant children to the state, with little information being made available to the public or to state leaders, creates confusion and could be very problematic. The start of school is approaching for many districts across the state, and the federal government’s actions have caused great uncertainty around this issue.


http://benswann.com/obama-sneaks-760-illegal-immigrants-into-tennessee-its-unacceptable-no-one-was-told-says-governor/

LV Mom
Jul '14

Illegals demand representation in White House meetings


Illegal immigrants plan to picket the White House Monday afternoon, calling on fellow immigrant-rights advocacy groups to refuse to meet with the Obama administration until President Obama specifically includes illegal immigrants in any future meetings.

“We are among the millions of people who will either benefit or be harmed by the decisions the President makes, and we are here to represent ourselves in any future negotiations,” said Rosi Carrasco, one of organizers, in a statement announcing the action.
Billing themselves “undocumented immigrant leaders,” the organizers said they will erect a picket line to symbolize their demand.
The groups are fighting to keep momentum in the immigration debate, which has seemingly turned against them in recent weeks as Mr. Obama tries to deal with the surge of illegal immigrant children and families across the border.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/28/illegals-demand-representation-white-house/#ixzz38mD6L0Ax
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

LV Mom
Jul '14

with the permission and tacit approval of this administration the liberal mob keeps over-running the border, because we have not had the political will to enforce border security.

we need to protect our borders, yes? or no ?

using children as political pawns this way is cynically machiavellian, and should be called out for what it is . . . . . .

i say we should duly process these kids and send them all off to the middle of washington, right at the gates to the whitehouse.

our 'elected' leaders who claim they are working for the 'people' need to see this up close and personal with their own eyes. and if the president ever gets back to work in the whitehouse, he should make the effort to see this for himself, instead of getting a 'briefing' on airforce 1 or the golf course, or the when he's at the bar shooting pool and drinking beer. Obama needs to get engaged with what is really happening. period.

acting aloof, impersonal and above it all shows him for who he really is, not a nice guy. not nice at all, something else. and that's not good for our country.

we should have elected romney, we would have been much better off right now.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

"Illegals demand representation in White House meetings"

yup, there it is again as it has been throughout history, the liberal mob in action,

"off with their heads" goes the cry, unrestrained, uncontrolled, making demands, that's how they roll. just a mob, nothing more.

seesh!

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

not the first time Rosi has done something like this:

http://www.thenation.com/blog/169741/undocumented-protesters-arrested-dnc-police-preemptively-detain-prominent-activist

darwin darwin
Jul '14

not that MG needs the backup but here is a good article on tax rates

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/sep/28/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-taxes-families-are-their-lowest-/

A key reason for the especially low rates in 2008 was the recession, experts said.

"One expects taxes, in the aggregate, to decrease in a recession," said Lawrence J. White, an economist at the Stern School of Business at New York University. The reason: employment shrinks, incomes fall and people move to lower tax brackets.

Skippy Skippy
Jul '14

i told you guys before about the hypocrisy of Bill Gate's laying off 18K americans all the while complaining that he needs even more H1B visas to bring in guest workers from over seas:


Professors: Guest worker policies freezing Americans out of middle class...

Business executives and politicians endlessly complain that there is a "shortage" of qualified Americans and that the U.S. must admit more high-skilled guest workers to fill jobs in STEM fields: science, technology, engineering and math. This claim is echoed by everyone from President Obama and Rupert Murdoch to Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates.

Yet within the past month, two odd things occurred: Census reported that only one in four STEM degree holders is in a STEM job, and Microsoft announced plans to downsize its workforce by 18,000 jobs. Even so, the House is considering legislation that, like the Senate immigration bill before it, would increase to unprecedented levels the supply of high-skill guest workers and automatic green cards to foreign STEM students.

As longtime researchers of the STEM workforce and immigration who have separately done in-depth analyses on these issues, and having no self-interest in the outcomes of the legislative debate, we feel compelled to report that none of us has been able to find any credible evidence to support the IT industry's assertions of labor shortages.

Stagnant wages

If a shortage did exist, wages would be rising as companies tried to attract scarce workers. Instead, legislation that expanded visas for IT personnel during the 1990s has kept average wages flat over the past 16 years. Indeed, guest workers have become the predominant source of new hires in these fields.

Those supporting even greater expansion seem to have forgotten about the hundreds of thousands of American high-tech workers who are being shortchanged — by wages stuck at 1998 levels, by diminished career prospects and by repeated rounds of layoffs.

The facts are that, excluding advocacy studies by those with industry funding, there is a remarkable concurrence among a wide range of researchers that there is an ample supply of American workers (native and immigrant, citizen and permanent resident) who are willing and qualified to fill the high-skill jobs in this country. The only real disagreement is whether supply is two or three times larger than the demand.

Unfortunately, companies are exploiting the large existing flow of guest workers to deny American workers access to STEM careers and the middle-class security that should come with them. Imagine, then, how many more Americans would be frozen out of the middle class if politicians and tech moguls succeeded in doubling or tripling the flow of guest workers into STEM occupations.

Redundant reforms

Another major, yet often overlooked, provision in the pending legislation would grant automatic green cards to any foreign student who earns a graduate degree in a STEM field, based on assertions that foreign graduates of U.S. universities are routinely being forced to leave. Such claims are incompatible with the evidence that such graduates have many paths to stay and work, and indeed the "stay rates" for visiting international students are very high and have shown no sign of decline. The most recent study finds that 92% of Chinese Ph.D. students stay in the U.S. to work after graduation.

The tech industry's promotion of expanded temporary visas (such as the H-1B) and green cards is driven by its desire for cheap, young and immobile labor. It is well documented that loopholes enable firms to legally pay H-1Bs below their market value and to continue the widespread age discrimination acknowledged by many in the tech industry.

When considering the credibility of the industry's repetitive claims of "shortages," it is worth recalling its history of misbehavior in hiring and employment. The most recent example was the proposed $300 million legal settlement of a class action against companies such as Google, Apple, Intel and Adobe for anti-competitive collusion to suppress the pay of highly skilled employees, including unlawful agreements to not recruit each others' workers.

IT industry leaders have spent lavishly on lobbying to promote their STEM shortage claims among legislators. The only problem is that the evidence contradicts their self-interested claims.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/07/27/bill-gates-tech-worker-wages-reforms-employment-column/13243305/

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

WASHINGTON — President Obama urged Congress on Tuesday to quickly provide almost $4 billion to confront a surge of young migrants from Central America crossing the border into Texas, calling it “an urgent humanitarian situation
" http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/09/us/obama-seeks-billions-for-children-immigration-crisis.html?_r=0

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

"President Obama angrily conceded Monday that Congress will not overhaul immigration laws this year and announced that he will redirect immigration enforcement efforts to the border. "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-pledges-to-redirect-immigration-enforcement-conceding-defeat-on-overhaul/2014/06/30/40e69476-0083-11e4-8fd0-3a663dfa68ac_story.html

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

And a year ago: "Rubio warns Obama could act to legalize immigrants if Congress fails to pass reform"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/14/rubio-warns-obama-could-act-to-legalize-immigrants-if-congress-fails-to-pass/

Shall I go farther?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

JEFF KUHNER from the Kuhner Report organizes RALLY against illegals in MASS!
10,000 MA Residents Protest Illegal Immigration !!

http://www.teaparty.org/video-ma-residents-protest-illegal-immigration-49300/?fb_action_ids=808423922531585&fb_action_types=og.comments&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582

1500 have come to NJ since January 2014!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/28/Where-Are-They-Now-See-The-Top-States-Where-Border-Kids-Are-Released

sha44ss sha44ss
Jul '14

1,500 kids dropped off in NJ means taxpayers will have to fork over more money to educate these kids in public schools

15,000 dollars per year average public school cost per child, so then 15,0000 dollars x 1,500 additional students = 22,500,000

that's an additional 22.5 million dollars being added to the taxpayers burden,

that 22.5 million dollars does not include the cost of housing, food, clothes and extra aides for in classroom support that ESL students require.

so much for not raising taxes on the middle class, who are trying to hold onto their jobs and losing that battle as well.

we should round up these 1,500 kids and drop them off in washington, right at the door to the whitehouse,

Let the District of Columbia pay for them.

so much for 'the most transparent administration in history'. Obama won't walk his own talk,

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

2013 President's plan: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/29/read-president-obamas-immigration-proposal/

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/28/Where-Are-They-Now-See-The-Top-States-Where-Border-Kids-Are-Released

"over 30,000 children have been released in the following states (and the District of Columbia) from January 1 - July 7 in 2014. "

I never knew that the Virgin Islands received their statehood.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Released to sponsors, parents or guardians, while awaiting court processing on immigration case. Amazing there are some many parents/guardians waiting. The number is 30,000 thus far, see chart for 60,000 estimate by end of year which is almost ten times the average of 6,700.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

And here's where they come from. Since contiguous country kids are returned, makes you wonder why we easily spurn Mexico's troubled youth while accepting anything that moves from non contiguous countries.

This law needs immediate work. Well, time for a 5-week vacation for lawmakers. We can always blame Obama though, we got that going for us.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Virtually none from Nicaragua or Costa Rica. Why is that?


Time to get new representatives in Washington. It was not originally designed to be a lifelong career...


Perhaps.....

From WIKI:

CostaRica
"In 2010 Costa Rica was cited by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) as having attained much higher human development than other countries at the same income levels,[11] while in 2011, the UNDP also identified it as a good performer in environmental sustainability, with a better record on human development and inequality than the median of their region." Since then, Costa Rica has held 14 presidential elections, the latest in 2014. All of them have been widely regarded by the international community as peaceful and transparent.[citation needed] With uninterrupted democracy dating back to at least 1948, the country is the most stable in the region.

Nicaragua on the other hand is very poor but pretty peaceful now post the Sandinistas so does not make as much sense.

Guatemala is very poor with most of its GDP coming from immigrants to the US: perhaps its the largest base of US relatives. El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Honduras are hell holes; all four of these have intentional murder rates on equal or greater with Mexico, some twice as bad, one 5 times as bad.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Bottom line it's going to cost us, the taxpayer, a ton of money that we don't have.


I knew some Costo Ricans that went back or some of there family went back. I asked why, They said it is a very beautiful country and there Tourism is working very well. One in particular had a very good Job here. One other was a student that Graduated college and went back. My brother has a neighbor that is working here to get around an $800 pension and can live very well down there. I read some where that's a perquisite to move there.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

The definition of the word Conundrum is: something that is puzzling or confusing.

Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America:

1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the 21st Century. Makes you wonder who is doing the math.

These three, short sentences tell you a lot about the direction of our current government and cultural environment:

1. We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works.

And here's another one worth considering...

2. Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. How come we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What's interesting is the first group "worked for" their money, but the second didn't. Think about it.....

and last but not least,

3. Why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before WWII, but we are not stopping the payments or benefits to illegal aliens.

Snow Cone
Jul '14

Very well said Snow Cone.


Pretty funny since the lament is from someone who embraces socialism in some form but just wants to get rid of programs that don't help "his kind." We've covered why American conservatives are socialist before so we'll just go after the current round of mis-spin-statements. It is really not a progressive opinion, it's just correcting the obvious factual errors.

1. "America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized."
Define subsidized: as of July 2014, according to Statistics Brain, 21% are on unemployment, food stamps and welfare combined. Where do the other 29% come from? 50% of 40-hours fast food workers are on food stamps though since the minimum wage keeps them close to the poverty level.

2. "Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer."
And yet the richer are richer than ever before in history. Currently the upper class owns more American assets than ever before in American history while paying the lowest tax rate since the 1950's. So who is really running the government?

3. ". They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries."
Really? This seems like just some misguided opinion, so prove it.

4. " We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works." 30,000 dead each year by guns is not a few lunatics; it's a murder by gun ratio that is third world.

5. " Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. How come we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What's interesting is the first group "worked for" their money, but the second didn't. Think about it....."
OK, this one is so factually wrong on so many levels. First, these are two different types of accounts. Welfare/food stamps are programs funded by each year's income taxes covered in each year's budget voted upon by Congress. Income taxes are where you give your money away, maybe receive some benefits, maybe not. SS is outside the budget and is not funded by yearly income taxes, and is instead an insurance annuity account where you invest money, it gets invested in turn while your account builds, and then you get an annuity of your investment plus interest at maturity. SS is where you invest your money to get it, and maybe some more, back --- it's insurance and works......like insurance. Also, many welfare and food stamp workers not only "worked for their money," but many are working full time AS they get these benefits since both full time and poverty can happen at the same time in America.

6." Why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and cutting our army to a level lower than before WWII, but we are not stopping the payments or benefits to illegal aliens"
Really? What veteran benefits did we cut? And what does cutting the size of the army have to do with it? The military have gotten pay raises every year since 1976 tied to the economy. From WIKI "U.S. Code dictates a rather complex equation for military pay raises, based on the Employment Cost Index... businesses. Military pay increases by "the percentage by which the ECI for the base quarter of the year before the preceding year exceeds the ECI for the base quarter of the second year before the preceding calendar year (if at all)." Specifically, the code states, that’s the ECI for wages and salaries of private industry workers.

Essentially, when the ECI goes up, so does military pay, so that military salaries don’t fall behind civilian ones. For example, because the ECI increased 1.4 percent in 2009, that’s the proposed military pay raise in 2010. The raise is unusually low — the smallest percent change since the series began in 1975, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The President is empowered to suggest a lower or higher pay raise, which must be ratified by Congress, in extenuating circumstances like an economic crisis. Congress can also vote to change the president's proposed decrease or increase. For the 2011 budget, the House Armed Services Committee suggested boosting the 1.4 percent raise. But defense personnel officials resisted, saying they would rather that money be used for other programs that benefit military families. After an 11-year string of increases that slightly exceeded average private sector annual raises, Army Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel Lt. Gen. Thomas Bostick said that, "We actually think we have a surplus in terms of pay."

BUSTED, but it was said very well, reads nice. Almost as if you plagiarized it from another author. Oh wait, you did.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Well said Snow Cone.

Usual diarrhea of the mouth from the gman from up there on krypton.

Extownie
Jul '14

takes one to know one i guess........

btw; where's the transparency Obama promised? (we should have elected romney when we had the chance):


Mike Pence Learned HHS Was Dumping Migrant Children in His State from the Press, Not HHS -

In a letter to President Obama, Pence wrote that the Department of Health and Human Services informed him that the federal government had housed hundreds of unaccompanied alien children in Indiana from January 1, 2014, to July 7, 2014, but only after reports surfaced in the media.

“While we feel deep compassion for these children, our country must secure its borders and provide for a legal and orderly immigration process,” Pence wrote. “Failure to expedite the return of unaccompanied children thwarts the rule of law and will only continue to send a distorted message that illegally crossing into America is without consequence.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/384064/mike-pence-learned-hhs-was-dumping-migrant-children-his-state-press-not-hhs-ryan#!

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

yes very well said Snow Cone, only you didn't say it. Man if you are going to cut and paste something at least give the original writer his credit don't pass it off as your original thoughts.

darwin darwin
Jul '14

One man's facts are another's diarrhea I guess.

OK Pence, since this has been the process since at least 2003, glad you are waking up There's even a website you know. Maybe if you had someone on your staff read the 2002 Homeland Security Act..... And the govt, is not housing them, they are xferring them to parents or guardians while awaiting the court ruling.

Here's the peach: "Meanwhile, as of March 2014, nearly 8,000 illegal immigrants in Indiana have had their requests for temporary effectively legal status accepted via President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program created in 2012. Nearly 2,800 more people had their requests for DACA protection accepted in Indiana than did in New Mexico during the same time frame. That may provide insight about how Obama’s possible plans to unilaterally legalize five million illegal immigrants later this summer would impact Indiana, a concern that’s surely on Pence’s mind."

First of, as of 2Q2014, the latest data, the number is 7,000, not 8,000. Second it sounds like these folks just got shipped in. Not quite; DACA kids got here before age 16 and have been here for over 7 years Mike, in your state. They graduated high school in your state Mike (or will be), have no felonies or misdemeanors, And there's more.

Meanwhile Pence moves to allow certain felonies and misdemeanors to be expunged: "Indiana should be the worst place in America to commit a serious crime and the best place, once you've done your time, to get a second chance," Pence said in a statement."

Second chance to criminals; no chance for kids living in his state for seven years, clean, and educated. Cool.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

keep letting them all come in, as many who want to they just want a chance at a better life after all, what could go wrong? when even the tree-huggers are against unfettered, unbridled,uncontrolled immigration, you know there is a real problem:


Shock: 80% of U.S. population growth is from immigrants, resources being sucked dry

group dedicated to saving the planet by cutting runaway population increases is raising a new and shocking issue in Washington’s bitter fight over immigration reform: Most of the nation’s population growth is from immigrants, and they are consuming resources dangerously fast.

According to Negative Population Growth Inc., 80 percent of the growth in U.S. population comes from immigration, legal, illegal and among American-born children of immigrants.

“With increased population, we see a direct increase in the problems our nation faces on a daily basis: pollution, over-consumption, traffic gridlock, crowded schools and hospitals, overburdened social services, unemployment, crumbling infrastructure, urban sprawl, over-development, threatened or extinct animal and plant species, and dwindling natural resources,” said said Tracy Canada, the group’s deputy director.

She added, “Immigrants to the U.S. are also found to greatly increase their consumption — and their resulting footprints — upon settling here, which furthers our nation’s environmental impact.”

http://washingtonexaminer.com/shock-80-of-u.s.-population-growth-is-from-immigrants-resources-being-sucked-dry/article/2551464

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Do you even vet the trash you post? Cause this one could be in the Friday Funnies.

NPG is a 30,000 member group that advocates taking the 316M US population down to 150 to 200M......gradually and orderly thank God. But after 42 years of failure, who knows where they turn next.

I guess immigration would be somewhat outside their charter.

Don Mann, President since 1972, the group's start date, amazingly is an liberal arts major turned international businessman who made his money working in other countries. Ironic, ain't it. His theory is that since we are running out of gas and to keep the environment clean, the answer is less people. Apparently Don does not seem to believe in term limits or sharing. Don lives what he believes in sparsely populated Tenafly NJ which he advocates turning into a dairy farm run by Don Mann (ok, the dairy farm part is not true).

He believes the 7B peopled planet should be 1-2B. Gonna be lonely in Don's world.

But BDog and the WashingtonExaminer believe Don and that might be all you need to know about that.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Come on MG please don't disrespect an organization that is near and dear to BrotherDog. I mean this organization pushes for govt policies to encourage 2kid families by encouraging birth control and even at times abortion. They even blame the human population for climate changes and increased hurricanes Everyone knows BD is for big govt to be in our bedrooms and is pro abortion and think climate change is real and man made so of course he would site this organization as a reputable source that we should ALL take serious and listen to

http://www.npg.org/library/forum-series/proposed-national-population-policy.html

Darwin Darwin
Jul '14

you guys don't comprehend what you read very well in your OCD rush to throw stones at me. i urge you both to stay in school. you missed some stuff.

i never said what you said i said, just posted an article for discussion.

u both need to go back and re-read what was actually said vs. what was quoted from an article, conflation much you guys??? do you feel better now that you gave each other back rubs? (not that there is anything wrong with that)

without borders we have no country, why is it so very hard for liberals to understand that? it's a pretty simple concept, yet it seems to elude today's practicing 'progressives'

if 80% of our population growth comes from immigrants both legal and illegal, how much more will you guys close one eye to before you both wake up and smell the coffee?

darwin, when will you start walking your own talk and take one of these dumped illegal immigrant kids into your own house and buy them food and clothes and pay for their ESL , class room assisted instruction? as i said before the illegals already dumped here by the feds will cost NJ an additional 22.5 million dollars to send to public school. who is going to pay for that? you darwin?

as the other poster said, "It must be happy hour at the Babble house." people shouldn't post after drinking, they know not what they type, or understand what they just read.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

Maybe this helped Costo Rica export business.

Mark A. Sanzo, 56, Robert J. Scerbo, 56, and William A. Bruder, 44, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Claire C. Cecchi in federal court in Newark. They were charged with one count of racketeering conspiracy, the U.S. attorney's office said.

The website was operated from Costa Rica and from various regions of the U.S.

The three men were agents for the sports betting website Beteagle and issued bettors with a username and password, paid winners, and collected money from losses in person, Fishman said.

Old Gent Old Gent
Jul '14

BrotherDog, how about you give an opinion about your own posts. Otherwise, anyone would assume the views in your post are your own. Pretty disgusting of you to then ridicule people for making that assumption.


oh, it's in there, maybe you should go back and re-read what you missed.

sad really how the libs jump to their own predetermined conclusions, and then criticize the other side for being 'unaware' . . . . . .

it's no wonder you guys don't see a problem with unregulated, unrestrained and unlawful illegal immigration.

illegals already dumped here by the feds will cost NJ an additional 22.5 million dollars to send to public school so far. that does not include the special assistance support from extra in class aides to remediate the skills deficit in the ESL school population.

How many more will be dumped off in the dead of night with no notification? How much more are taxpayers expected to pony up to take care of them?

this is a true raising of taxes on the middle class, how much more will be forced on us?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

“While we feel deep compassion for these children, our country must secure its borders and provide for a legal and orderly immigration process,”

“Failure to expedite the return of unaccompanied children thwarts the rule of law and will only continue to send a distorted message that illegally crossing into America is without consequence.”

Indiana Governor Mike Pence, July 29th

he is right, we need to do this

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Jul '14

BD, looks like you'll have to wait...your tea party loonies are leaving for vacation. And they have lots more important things to do.

WASHINGTON -- A day before going on vacation and heading into the election season, Republicans in the House of Representatives passed a resolution Wednesday authorizing Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to sue President Barack Obama for what they say has been inadequate enforcement of the health care law they oppose.

The suit would seek to make Obama strictly enforce the Affordable Care Act that Boehner has held some 50 votes to undermine or repeal. Republicans object that the Obama administration has delayed some parts of the law, particularly the mandate on employers who do not provide health care coverage.

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Jul '14

I actually agree that the Republican law covering kids from non-contiguous countries illegally crossing our borders, passed with bipartisan support, should be modified to help with the current situation. If how we cover Mexico is good enough, then why not handle these other countries the same way. The Republican house should do more about it than to just whine how it's Obama's fault and then whine when he takes Executive Action and then whine some more when he proposes fixes that cost money. Can't have it ten ways to Sunday.

Meanwhile, speaking of reading..... I think when you, BDog, post opinions from nut jobs it does not help either your argument nor your credibility. Clearly, this guy is a bit off. It's like saying Hitler's mustache is stylish; might be but ain't ever be worn by sane people. And all I did was point out the guy is nutty with mostly nutty ideas. The rest of your paranoia about what I must have meant is yours because I did not say what you said I did.

And, as noted once again, who says I don't have problems with unfettered immigration except you?

Your 22.5M for education of the 1,500 kids dropped off in the dead of night without calling either Chris Christie or BDog is pretty close but only as a July of this year, plus it's probably factored at one-year's enrollment so high for this year but low for total spending. However, it does not factor in the sponsor's offsetting tax payments who is a legal tax paying person or family in America usually a parent or legal guardian.

And what about all those foreign exchange students we keep freebieing. There's over 30,000 in the US and over 300 of those scofflaws in NJ each year. That's over $4.5M in education funds we are giving away and we've been doing this for over 50 years. And they keep dropping them off in the dead of night without telling me. Given that's the same national total as illegal kids but the NJ total is much lower, what does that tell you? That foreign kids who can choose states, don't choose NJ :>) No wonder they're dropping off those illegals in the dead of night :>)

As far as the "dead of night" dumping, so pass a law. This has been going on for over a decade and it hasn't bothered you till now so lighten up. I am sure the Republicans will come back from their five-week leave and think of something more to do about it than just blame Obama for their law.

Point is that this is a clusterflux of the first order because of a law written with the best intents but a loop hole creating the current situation. It takes action, a new law, to correct that flaw. So tell your representative to get off their vacation and fix it ---- NOW.

Separate from that is the issue of current illegals in America and while DACA is one alternative, lawmakers need to again get off their proverbials, quit pandering for the midterms, and pass some laws to fix it. NOW.

And PS --- how about helping out the VA while your at it or its that just political fodder to feast on too?

At least two of these three --- the current kid crisis and the VA, should have been fixed before vacation, I don't see the polarizing party platforms here, and the only political gain should be the fallout price of pain from not fixing it NOW Immigration reform might be weightier, might take longer, but both parties have plenty of bills; they should be able to put something together. Immigration reform has been close to a vote a number of times, just get the Tea Party out of the way this time.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Jul '14

Thank you thank you thank you just as I predicted the Republicans decided not to vote on the emergency immigration bill

easier to do nothing and cry it's Obama's fault then to actually do something

oldred
Jul '14

Pathetic:

Washington (CNN) -- On the last day before summer recess, dysfunction reigned in Congress.

House Republicans called off a vote on their $659 million emergency response to the border influx from Central America overwhelming immigration resources, unable to agree among themselves about what to do.

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Jul '14

You just can't make this up.

So on Wednesday, House Republicans in a unique act of getting something done voted to sue the President for taking executive action to change the ACA, a first and new low and prelude to impeachment. Unfortunately they just couldn't find the time for one more repeal of the ACA.

Then on Thursday, they whine blame the President for NOT taking executive action on the border crisis to change the law they wrote, sponsored, and voted for. Boehner said. "There are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now without the need for congressional action." And then they can sue him again!

Meanwhile, the Tea Party fired it's Cruz missile to derail a REPUBLICAN $659M appropriations bill to stem the illegal alien kiddie flow. How many times can Boehner be neutered?

So more doing nothing, but instead of heading home for a vacation after a year of doing less than anyone in Congress has not done before, they decided to stay in Washington so they could keep the nothing close to the office.

"If Speaker Boehner and other establishment Republicans want to know what a grass-roots movement looks like, this is it," said Tea Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin. Apparently it looks like nothing, just like the last 3+ years.

Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman tweeted, "Any border package bill that doesn't defund @BarackObama's #amnesty is a #CrapChimichanga" promising an overt escalation of the nothing. Uh, these folks are from Honduras and El Salvador Steve. Chimichanga?

Texas Republican Kay Granger, who said Thursday that "doing nothing is not an option." True, it's not an option, it's the mantra for a way of life.

Even chest thumping Muslim basher New York Republican Peter King who has even questioned Rand Paul's patriotism, said Cruz was continuing the Republican recent 3-year legacy "to do nothing."

OMGoodness and this is the party trying to take over the Senate so they can run the country? They can't even run their own house. Rumor has it that even comedians are asking Republicans to decrease the joke softballs, they are drowning in the hypocrisy humor overload.

I think Republican Alison Grimes summed it up best: "If doctors told Senator McConnell he has a kidney stone, he'd refuse to pass it," said Grimes,

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Eerie silence from LV Mom and BD...did you guys run out of aluminum foil? Or are you waiting for your meds to kick in?

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Charles Krauthammer came down hard on the Republican reaction to the crisis of unaccompanied minors crossing the U.S.-Mexico border on Thursday during Fox News' "Special Report."

On Wednesday, House Republicans passed a resolution that would allow House Speaker John Boehner to sue President Obama for overstepping his authority, specifically with regard to the Affordable Care Act. One day later, House Republicans issued a statement on immigration, claiming that "there are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now, without the need for congressional action, to secure our borders and ensure these children are returned swiftly and safely to their countries."

A frustrated Krauthammer called this kind of flip flop "ridiculous" and "incomprehensible."

"It is, to me, incomprehensible that Republicans aren't getting together on this," he said. "It is ridiculous to sue the president on a Wednesday because he oversteps the law, as he has done a dozen times illegally and unconstitutionally, and then on a Thursday say that he should overstep the law, contradict the law that passed in 2008 and deal with this himself."

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Conservative columnist and Fox News contributor George Will has long been an advocate for immigration reform, including a conservative version of a “path to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants, for some time, but he took his position a bit further Sunday morning on Fox News Sunday. Referring to the influx of unaccompanied children crossing the border from Mexico and other Central American countries — over 52,000 since last October — Will told host Chris Wallace that the United States should welcome these children with open arms.

“We ought to say to these children, ‘Welcome to America, you’re going to go to school and get a job and become Americans,’” Will implored. “We have 3,141 counties in this country. That would be 20 per county. The idea that we can’t assimilate these eight-year-old criminals with their teddy bears is preposterous.”

Wallace warned that detractors will accuse Will of not understanding the issue, but he was undeterred. “We can handle this problem, is what I’m saying,” he reassured. “We’ve handled what Emma Lazarus famously called ‘the wretched refuse of your teeming shores’ a long time ago and a lot more people than this.”

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

If you blame Obama for lack of leadership, where does that leave Boehner and McConnell; the two top Republicans, much less the little people like Cruz, etc.

Rand Paul looking like the only one with real principles in the "principled" party and he's busy working hard with Corey Booker. That ought to go over big for his Tea Party image.

But YF; no need to kick our HL friends around over this one, you be better than that.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

I am just watching the show. The House is called the Peoples House. That's just what it is in this divided Country today. The Senate dose not even vote up or down on bills. The United States is not very United, IMO

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

this is a false crisis that has been engineered by the obmaites to push for comprehensive immigration reform, and it's not working,

time to wake up and smell the coffee!

according to the law there are only two exceptions, one is for mexican kids, they are not allowed in by law, the second is if the kids are to be delivered to a family member or guardian then they are not feared to be part of the sex trafficking, so they are not allowed in according to the written law, except that Obama behaving lawlessly is allowing them in even though they are being delivered to family members or guardians, and are not supposed to be allowed into the country.

this is in direct violation of the written statute, so it is lawless on obama's and his acolytes part, (as they are still blinded by the light of their savior, although he is just another false prophet)

no surprise here that this failed president continues to behave lawlessly and is allowed to get away with it,

pathetic!

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

BG if what you say is true. Impeach him. Stop playing games with suing. Thank goodness Garrett didn't vote for it wasting time and money. If you think one branch of Government is going to infringe on a another branch, you are foolish

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

The Republicans loved riding the tiger [Teabag party] into office but now that it's starting to eat them they don't like it anymore. Just how stupid do Republicans think the American people are why do Republicans think suing the president is the most pressing issue in the country. And not anything else that's what happens when you get gerrymandered districts where the representatives no matter what they do they will be reelected By the way Alison Grimes is a Democrat

oldred
Aug '14

First, the lawsuit is about Obama's executive action over the ACA, different issue from the border crisis; however it's linked only in the Republicans hypocritical demand that he exercise executive action over the border crisis like Boehner sues him for one thing and then asks him to do the same thing to cover his ineptitude at making legislation in his own party.

Second BDog's third paragraph, the gist of his rant, just does not even make sense. Not sure what he is trying to conclude since it's noncontiguous countries (that would exclude Mexico and Canada) and the kids are not being let in, but instead being transferred to parents and guardians AWAITING their immigration deportation or acceptance hearing. That is the law so the rest of BDog's ascertains are balderdash. By the way, this also takes the kids off the federal books for food and housing so you would think the Dogman would be happy. But noooooo.

And yet the dogmeister calls Obama lawless for simply following the law. A law, need I say it a tenth time, written, sponsored, and voted in by Republicans. Yawn dogperson, yawn.

There are two easy alternatives to fix. The heartless one to turn them all away (why we do this with Mexican/Canadian kid refugees one might question). Or the compassionate one to expedite the asylum hearings to accept those in danger and return those who are not ASAP including contiguous countries.

As far as a false crisis, who knows what the dogster is smoking; 60,000 kids this year when the 10-year average is 6,000 per year don't sound "engineered" to me. That dog just don't hunt.

I still wonder about those loony Republicans doing nothing all year, then deciding to give up their vacation (where you do nothing but enjoy) to stay in Washington to do nothing seems somewhat less than productive. Jon Stewart should be epic tonight!

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Teabag? Really oldred. You're a pig. That is disgusting. But so typical


yankeefan, nothing eerie about having a life....


http://www.teaparty.org/obamas-5-top-flip-flops-immigration-50129/

Obama’s 5 Top Flip-Flops on Immigration

(Breitbart) – On Wednesday, President Obama threatened to veto the House of Representatives’ proposed border bill. Obama particularly disliked provisions of the bill designed to amend the 2008 law that allows illegal immigrant minors from non-border countries to stick around for years awaiting deportation proceedings.

His statement explained:

By setting arbitrary timelines for the processing of cases, this bill could create backlogs that could ultimately shift resources away from priority public safety goals, like deporting known criminals. This bill will undercut due process for vulnerable children which could result in their removal to life threatening situations in foreign countries.


In other words, Obama wants to keep newly arriving illegal immigrant children – not the ones who have already arrived, and are not covered by the House bill – stuck in legal limbo for two or more years.

Just weeks ago, Obama himself called for changes to the 2008 law. He sent a letter to Congress asking for authority to “exercise discretion in processing the return and removal of unaccompanied minor children from non-contiguous countries like Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest explained, “There are some challenges that are posed by the current law, this 2008 law.”

Now, however, Obama has flip-flopped on the issue – the better to polarize the debate around illegal immigration.

This isn’t the first time that Obama has flip-flopped on immigration. Here are four other instances of such wavering:

Border Security. Just a month ago, Obama proposed additional border security for the Rio Grande valley – and he wanted billions to fund it, supposedly. But in May 2011, Obama spoke in El Paso, stating, “You know, they said we needed to triple the Border Patrol. Or now they’re going to say we need to quadruple the Border Patrol. Or they’ll want a higher fence. Maybe they’ll need a moat. Maybe they want alligators in the moat. They’ll never be satisfied. And I understand that. That’s politics. But the truth is the measures we’ve put in place are getting results.”

Executive Orders. In March 2011, Obama stated, “With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed — and I know that everybody here at Bell is studying hard so you know that we’ve got three branches of government. Congress passes the law. The executive branch’s job is to enforce and implement those laws. And then the judiciary has to interpret the laws.”

As Politico noted, when Obama was confronted in November 2013 by a protester yelling that Obama had “power to stop deportation,” Obama said, “Actually I don’t.” Obama went on, “If, in fact, I could solve all these problems without passing laws in Congress, then I would do so. But we’re also a nation of laws. That’s part of our tradition. And so the easy way out is to try to yell and pretend like I can do something by violating our laws.”

Today, of course, Obama has declared an endless stream of executive actions designed to loosen consequences for illegal immigration.

E-Verify. As the Washington Post has pointed out, in March 2004, Obama wrote on a questionnaire that he opposed the government “crack[ing] down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants.” In 2008, he said, “we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation.” Now, of course, Obama just wants to hand out work permits like candy.

Deportation. Just last Friday, President Obama said that illegal immigrant minors would be sent home. “We have to deter a continuing influx of children putting themselves at great risk,” he said. That same day, the Los Angeles Times reported, “Roughly 5 million of the estimated 11 million people who entered the country without legal authorization or overstayed their visas could be protected under a leading option the White House is considering.”

President Obama’s failure to take a strong stand on illegal immigration is mere trolling at this point. He wants to tell his constituents that Republicans are out of their minds for worrying about the border, while simultaneously incentivizing millions to cross that border. He wants to suggest that he’s interested in solving the problem even as he exacerbates it. He’s hoping that the chaos he creates will somehow precipitate a handover of even more power to him. Instead, it’s just angering Americans, as well it should.

LV Mom
Aug '14

Typical lying democrat..


http://thehayride.com/2014/08/when-the-cameras-are-off-mary-landrieu-votes-for-amnesty/
When The Cameras Are Off, Mary Landrieu Votes For Amnesty

It seems Sen. Mary Landrieu’s (D-LA) public persona is different from her private.

Yesterday, when Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-) offered a motion to allow amendments to the immigration supplemental, Landrieu voted for the motion while the cameras were rolling. Sessions said the purpose of the motion was to eventually allow the Cruz Amendment, which would halt executive amnesty by President Barack Obama.

But, when the cameras stopped rolling, Landrieu changed her vote, thus voting to continue allowing executive-granted amnesty to illegal immigrants. We even have a photo below showing that Landrieu crossed out her original vote.



Rep. Bill Cassidy’s (R-LA) spokesman said the move came after Senate Majority Leader likely told Landrieu to switch her vote.

“In election years, Senator Landrieu talks a big game about being independent and working for the people of Louisiana,” said John Cummins, Spokesman Bill Cassidy for Senate. “But yesterday, all Harry Reid had to do was ask and Mary Landrieu switched her vote and supported keeping President Obama’s executive amnesty on the books. Louisiana deserves a Senator who will represent Louisiana, Mary Landrieu proved she only votes with Louisiana when Harry Reid says she can.”

The move comes as Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) has noted that Louisiana has become a haven for illegal immigrants, flooding the Southern Border. According to Vitter, there are approximately 3,215 unaccompanied immigrant minor cases in Louisiana

LV Mom
Aug '14

Seems like the President is the one standing in the way of what the majority of (tax paying) citizens want.


“It just boggles the mind that the president of the United States would rather fundraise in Hollywood than work with the members of his own party to forge a legislative response to this tragic situation — and to do something to prevent more young people from making the perilous and potentially life-threatening journey across the desert,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told Newsmax in a statement after the vote.

The House bill would have provided $659 million in funding that Obama had threatened to veto. House Republican leaders were scrambling to figure out a way to bring a border-security bill back to the chamber for passage on Friday.

But several House conservatives told Newsmax late Thursday that they will not support any legislation that does not require Obama to rescind his executive order that created the illegal immigration debacle.

“The president must be stopped from giving deferred action or amnesty to any more illegal aliens,” said Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks. “This would undermine the jobs and incomes of struggling American families.”

- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/senate-republicans-block-2-7-billion-border-security-bill-50025/#sthash.cHD2fjiX.dpuf

LV Mom
Aug '14

Hopefully House Republicans will put a complete halt to his agenda or
God help us.

Listening to him today, I couldn't help thinking, waaaaaahhhhhhhh, somebody call a waaahmbulance. lol

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-obama-border-20140801-story.html

President Obama blasted House Republicans for focusing on "extreme" and "partisan message bills," rather than solving problems, highlighting how little lawmakers have accomplished before leaving town for a summer recess.

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday, Obama noted signs of economic progress, but argued that "we could be much further along" if the GOP had agreed to "even basic" elements of his agenda.

LV Mom
Aug '14

There are so many outright lies in LV Mom's post, too many to audit but here's a couple.

"Seems like the President is the one standing in the way of what the majority of (tax paying) citizens want." "The House bill would have provided $659 million in funding that Obama had threatened to veto."

So Obama's now the bad guy for the bill the Republican's scuttled? How do you stand in the way of something that's not there. Now Republicans are afraid of Obama getting in the way of their nothing.

"House Republican leaders were scrambling to figure out a way to bring a border-security bill back to the chamber for passage on Friday".

As of 3pm they were still working at nothing so after that they can feel good about going on vacation. That was some scramble but now it's time to take a break from this busy work of doing nothing.

“The president must be stopped from giving deferred action or amnesty to any more illegal aliens,” said Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks. “This would undermine the jobs and incomes of struggling American families.”

Hey Mo, last I checked, these were kids?

Good think we have Mo lookin to the future. Wonder where he was a few years ago when Republicant's wrote, sponsored, and voted for this bill that put us where we are today?

But to sum up a hard working Republican week full of nothing, I will leave you with the pure feeling of the progress of nothingness in their own words. "one (statement) this week stood out: A statement by House leaders including Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) that President Barack Obama should act unilaterally on immigration — the day after the House voted to authorize Mr. Boehner to sue the president for acting unilaterally." the wire.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Forgive him simo (oldred) he got his lingo from his best bud. Hanoi Jane.

whitey whitey
Aug '14

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/08/01/Border-Bill-Passes-House

BORDER BILL PASSES HOUSE

“Our plan reallocates $694 million to secure the border, provide emergency care, and prevent future arrivals,” House Republican Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) said after the vote. “This will ensure that children are reunited with families in their home countries. Our solution addresses the problem humanely, effectively, and expeditiously. The crisis at the border demands our attention. It demands our action. And it demands our immediate and unwavering leadership.”
The legislation is unlikely to go much farther, however. The Senate left for August recess this week after failing to pass a supplemental border bill and President Obama slammed House Republicans Friday for “trying to pass the most extreme and unworkable versions of a bill that they already know is going nowhere, that can't pass the Senate and that if it were to pass the Senate I would veto. They know it.”
The Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) threw the ball back in Obama’s court after the bill’s passage, however, saying “while the House acted today to provide targeted and narrow funding to meet urgent needs at our southern border, it is ultimately up to President Obama to end this crisis by reversing his policies that created it.”
House Speaker John Boehner also released this statement in response to the bill's passage:
The House has just passed a responsible bill to address the humanitarian crisis at our southern border. It will help secure our border and ensure the safe and swift return of these children to their home countries. If President Obama needs these resources, he will urge Senate Democrats to put politics aside, come back to work, and approve our bill. There are also steps the president can take to address this crisis within the law, and without further legislative action. Every day the president and his party fail to act is another day this crisis continues.

LV Mom
Aug '14

Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) put it this way: "Only cowards scapegoat children and only those who are ashamed of themselves do it after hours on a Friday night." He added later, "In the end, the Republican position on immigration can be summed up as 'deport 'em all.'"

Good luck with that.

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Late Friday night, Ted Cruz missile was heard whispering to the tan man Boehner "pssssst, did you happen to call Mitch McConnell?" Boehner whispered back: "I did but it was after 7pm, he was asleep."

If Obama was feelin frisky, he would execute and executive order for $659M and do whatever he likes to solve the border crisis. And when the Boehner boys batch and moan upon their return, he can read out the statement by House leaders including Boehner that Obama should act unilaterally on immigration. Welcome back boys, I was still working !!!!

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

louis gutierriez is a race baiter who blames everything on non-hispanics;

he always has and always will, he is the epitome of the new reverse racism we find ourselves subjected to on a daily basis. it is now criminal to be white and republican, and Christian. it is against the politcally correct common sense laws to be any of those things, and gutierriez is taking full advantage of it by promoting his hateful lies.

the house passed bills that address the issue, but Obama does not know how to compromise, he only knows how to point fingers and divide the country, does the president not realize how legislation gets made? conference, compromise? these are mysteries to 'the smartest guy in the room', he has no clue how to do that. obama has always been unwilling to meet halfway with the republicans, saying things to them like. "We won the election, we won".

r u kidding me?

Obama is a rabid idealogical who only wants things done his way or the highway, and as a result of not being able to play well with others he is the most unproductive president in history.

there only a few left out there who don;t see this, they are a dwindling minority and are getting more shrill by the minute.

the house passed two bills that address this current situation, so now the ball is in the senates court, what will harry reid post for a vote? oh, that's right, nothing, the senate left town before they could address the president's issue. wonder who made that call? that's right, it was the democratic majority. part of their overall strategy to further demonize their opposition. and by doing it this way proves that they could care less about the fate of the kids poring across the borders. it's not about the kids for the democrats ,it's only about beating the republicans. this is cold, cynical and bad, just bad.

but now the ball is in Obama's court

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

LVMOM

Is another one of these people who only give you half truths to bolster her side of an issue. For instance in her last post she put down that the Senate went on vacation after failing to pass a border Bill but what she neglects to tell you is that the bill the Senate was voting on was filibustered by the Republicans so no vote could be taken she likes to leave those little details out of her stories

oldred
Aug '14

whitey
exactly what is your problem with servicemen in some of your posts you seem to have a deep rooted hatred for people who served in the military

oldred
Aug '14

Oldred, the teller of truths and a filthy mouth. I thought you would be man enough and apologize for that disgusting comment. Won't hold my breath.


Unfortunately, that's a tough criticsm to support Simo. The "tea bagging" comments started within the movement itself.

Gadfly Gadfly
Aug '14

Started in the movement in the context oldred is presenting Gadfly? Surely not. So why say simo's criticism is wrongly placed?

The reason "tea bagging" became an insult was to distract and name call, period. That says a lot about the people who use the phrase, does it not?

justintime justintime
Aug '14

They started oot calling themselves "tea baggers" which just shows how unhype they were. It wasn't until they got the joke that they stopped. But sorry when you hold a sign saying " tea baggers for change" people are going to laugh.


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement

Darwin Darwin
Aug '14

Oh yes. Wikipedia. Another source for truth. Still a disgusting term and oldred shoud be ashamed. How is it he can't defend himself?


Unhip or unHYPE? I think you nailed it.

As I said, turning it into an insult (not merely making a joke out of it) really does say a lot about the people who use the phrase. It's funny the first time. After that, it's a petty attack slander used to make the person using it feel better about themselves and the position they choose to take.

More precisely:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

justintime justintime
Aug '14

Here's a tea bagger sign


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_kXnVoQ9ZFkQ/St01y21wEkI/AAAAAAAAI-Q/Nb94s9Iyp2Q/s400/teabag+for+jesus.jpg

Darwin Darwin
Aug '14

Actually, JIT, the tea party protesters did use the term as a profane double entendre from the beginning. You can look it up. Slogans like "tea bag the whitehouse" and "teabag the liberals before they tea bag you". Posted below is a protest sign from early in 2009. Turnabout is fair play, or so I've heard.

http://washingtonindependent.com/31868/scenes-from-the-new-american-tea-party

Gadfly Gadfly
Aug '14

Yes, the picture of the old lady and the one with the young boy carrying those two signs clearly meant the word teabag took on the same meaning as tea baggers that oldred used. No, that word came out from the liberal media. I believe Anderson Cooper was one of the first to use it on CNN. Still waiting oldred to defend himself.


"Mr. Speaker, the house is not in order . . . . . . ."

this says it all,

this current state of affairs cannot be allowed to continue

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Lol sorry JIT stupid autocorrect.

Darwin Darwin
Aug '14

Well, I am glad we are so interested in history :>)

Here's how the cat got out of the tea bag: http://theweek.com/article/index/202620/the-evolution-of-the-word-tea-bagger

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

look if the term is being used to denigrate and ridicule your opposition with a gross sexual image, then you're wrong, mean-spirited and childishly immature, and if that's the only play you got, then as JIT suggests, it says more about who you are as a person than it does about someone who holds a differing political viewpoint.

i never head the term 'tea bagging' until one day about 15 years ago listening to Opie and Anthony on the radio in the car. they were yucking it up pretty good. and i must confess that as much as i listened to them laughing about 'tea bagging' I had no clue as what it was they were talking about. I asked a friend about it and he explained it to me,

omg . . . . .it's gross, that's for sure.

anyone who chooses to use terms like this to insult those who they disagree with should be called out for doing so.

and that's why simo is on to something . . . . . and oldred should own his own words and deal with them honestly, that's what honest people do anyways, they own their words and are honest about them

so when are the rest of you 'progressives' going to take issue with this?

once again by providing all of this historical documentation on the issue as an excuse shows how politically correct 'tolerance' only flows one way from most of the posters on here. it's almost like asking a victum of sexual assault; "Well, what were you wearing?" like they brought it on themselves.

the left is only tolerant of those who agree with them, and display over and over again a blind intolerance for those who are oriented differently, where's the tolerance?

walk your own talk, or if you can't do that or are unprepared to do that, then you should change your script.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

“What happened between last night and this morning has been absolutely remarkable,” said representative Michele Bachmann who called the vote on the bills, “arguably the most monumental vote that we will take in this entire term”.

Gee Michele, that's the lowest bar to jump in the history of Congress........

To recap, the House of do nothing took a few tries and did something and heralded it as the peak accomplishment of their term. Of course they did it in the dead of night before slinking away leaving it stillborn for five weeks until the Senate returns. Their parting shots of "now it's their problem, why aren't they here" were heard from House Republicans who brought their suitcases to the Capitol to speed their hasty retreat post retort.

So what define's Michele's monumental success? What's all the hubbub about:

The first bill appropriates enough extra money to superfund the border agencies for the last two months of the year; that's all. I guess either the Repubicants expect productivity miracles at levels they can only dream of for themselves OR expect to start again in January in the next session kicking the proverbial can. Could be some good new jobs for a couple of month; maybe they can find some illegals on the corner willing to take them....... Can you spell monumental Michele?

It also adds $35M for national guard support; worse case that's enough to fund Rick Perry's operation for 1 month leaving out CA, NM, and AZ. Even more monumental?

Adds more judges and detention centers.

And the big one: immediately deports non-contiguous country kids just like contiguous countries.

OK, besides the monumental short-sightedness on the funding numbers, the big detraction is that we inhumanely without compassion return kids-at-risk. Unfortunately that's the attraction too since why not treat everyone like Mexico and Canada.

Personally I don't see having it both ways and given the current dilemma, the existing law for contiguous countries has not be proven detrimental so why not go with it. The rest of the law is a silly, short-sighted, monumental political ploy for midterm votes but two months is two months. Not monumental, but something. Unless I misread something, this law should pass, with extreme prejudice for it's monumental or just mental stupid shortsightedness, but pass.

The second law, repealing DACA, is intended to stem the tide through sending a message and is just bogus. First, there are other ways to do this, they have been done, they seem to be working. Second, DACA kids have been here since 2007; that's 7 years. They arrived before their 16th birthday The have a HS degree or are in process, or honorable military discharge (you want to deport them post a tour of duty?), and "Have not been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, or three or more other misdemeanors, and do not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety."

So basically this new law wants to deport peaceful, lawful, high school educated kids who probably exceed the resumes of the average American citizen given that only about 40% of us are better educated with degrees beyond High School but 100% of the DACA kids will match America's 60% HS-only educated. 12% of us don't even have a HS degree. 10% of us have a felony, no DACA kid does. And with 10M misdemeanors filed each year, DACA kids look better than the average Joe for lawfulness; might improve the gene pool. So just dump this second law the tea party sponsored; it's a loser.

The best part is the super smart tea party severed the laws bifurcating the possible from the impossible making it easy to give them want they want and take it away even easier. The tea party is just not too smart OR loves their vacations way too much.

Chances are neither law will pass, the first based on humanitarian reasons primarily; the second on, well who cares, it was DOA before being written like most tea party legislation. However, I just don't see how humanitarian reasons can play if what's good enough for Mexico and Canada is not good enough for the rest of the world?

The perfect solution would be to protect the border, and any refugees seeking asylum be processed rapidly and equally for all nations. Universal fair treatment, judicial speed, efficiency, and effectiveness is what's needed --- not a system that sends kids at risk back to the risk.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Oldred? Still waiting.


Still enjoying the show. The terrorist won, The Tea Party put the brakes on a lawless government and meanwhile the invasion continues.

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Well I'm done waiting for oldred to own up to his filthy remark. I'll check back after November elections. God Bless America.


Why, such a problem? Say no at the gate, if they come over, under, through,just turn them around and send them back! No money involved, after a while, they will know they are not wanted here, and they can cross another border into another country, or rebel, and take there country back, like we did! Fight for whats right,teach a man how to fish, feed him for a lifetime,keep giving him fish,it wont get any better. Lets stop all this political crap, the Congress. the President,etc,are going to do nothing anyway.If a few illegals get through, put them up in the White House, they learn how to play golf,get in front of the cameras, and say nothing,and run for Government !


without secure borders the USA puts itself at risk:

Leaked CBP Report Shows Entire World Exploiting Open US Border

A leaked intelligence analysis from the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reveals the exact numbers of illegal immigrants entering and attempting to enter the U.S. from more than 75 different countries.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/08/03/Leaked-CBP-Report-Shows-Entire-World-Exploiting-Open-US-Border

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_thpeHffWg

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

So i had to go back....This is the line that got you all worked up simo??

"The Republicans loved riding the tiger [Teabag party] into office but now that it's starting to eat them they don't like it anymore"

LOL he didn't even use the term tea baggers, tea bagging. He used tea bag. Please that got you offended?? Man the Tea Party members were wearing tea bags hanging from their hats PROUDLY when they first started. The Tea Bag was almost used as a symbol for their party. Heck they were selling tea bag magnets.

darwin darwin
Aug '14

you guys and most of the media you subscribe to keep missing the boat.

there are two exceptions under the sex trafficking law, that everyone keeps talking about, and it is lawless of the Obama administration to ignore the second one as he effectuates policy changes using his standard Alinksy tactics. Cynically using disadvantaged children in his selfish political game of one-up-mans-ship is so wrong i don't even know where to begin,

the 2008 sex trafficking law has two exceptions that should bar minors form entering the country:

1. children from contiguous countries are not allowed in

2. if minor children arrive with family or are unaccompanied and are delivered to a parent or guardian already in the US then they are not considered to be part of a sex trafficking ring and are to be barred from entry. they are to be deported if given to family members.

this is what the law says, and Obama is ignoring it, why?

over 80 percent of them skip their deportation hearings as a matter of course, and there are no repercussions. this is one part of obama's plan to fundamentally change america, he releases them into the wild like little butterflys and says "Go, little ones, fly, fly . . ."

read on:

2008 Trafficking Law Largely Inapplicable to Current Border Crisis

The latest figures from U.S. Customs and Border Protection show a 106 percent increase in the number of minors entering the United States illegally and that 57,525 such minors have been apprehended between October 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014.2

Deportation records show a steady decline in the number of youths (under age 18) removed from 2008 to 2013. The number of Central American minors deported declined despite the increased number of minors arriving over the last several years. The records confirm that very few of the tens of thousands of Central Americans apprehended by the Border Patrol or ICE in recent years have been sent home, suggesting that the aspirations of tens of thousands of Central Americans now surging across the border are based on a realistic assessment of their chances to remain in the United States.3

Data on whether minors are arriving with family has been difficult to come by, but it is critical in crafting an appropriate response to the situation. It would be helpful to know what percentage of immigrant minors are arriving with family, and secondly, for those who arrive without family, what percentage have family inside the United States. These factors determine the applicability of the 2008 trafficking law.

It is unclear how many minors arriving at the U.S. border come with family members. But what happens to those who arrive on their own is more significant to the analysis. According to a leaked ICE memo, over 77 percent of non-Mexican children arriving at the border without a family member were released to family members inside the United States in FY 2013.4 According to advocates and media reports, around 90 percent of non-Mexican and non-Canadian children coming across the border are placed with family or guardians in the United States.5

http://cis.org/2008-trafficking-law-inapplicable-current-border-crisis



the fact is that Obama has engineered this crisis to expand the number of illegal aliens has been done under lawless pretenses, and the media and most of you have bought it hook, line and sinker.

it is time to wake up and smell the coffee, you sure need a double dose

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Apparently this is the LAW that Obama is ignoring according to the Dogster.

" if minor children arrive with family or are unaccompanied and are delivered to a parent or guardian already in the US then they are not considered to be part of a sex trafficking ring and are to be barred from entry. they are to be deported if given to family members."

OK, I am not a rocket scientist like BDog, but does this sound alien to you? The kids are to be barred from entry IF delivered to a parent in the US. So, we deliver them to bar them from entry?

OK, I am not a brain sturgeon but doesn't it smell fishy that not ONE Republican in office has figured out Obama is ignoring the law? Since this internet glob came out in early July, it could have been in the lawsuit. And the dogman lapped it up so it must be true.

Or maybe the law is being followed and the kids are being "paroled' to their parents or guardians in the US pending deportation court decisions. Nah, that can't be it, it must be Obama breaking the law so he can be elected again. Not to worry about the obvious, the Doginator has his conundrum of delivery-before-being-barred backed up with hard facts:

"over 80 percent of them skip their deportation hearings as a matter of course"

"Thousands of illegal juvenile immigrants from Central America do not show up for their deportation hearings across the country, the Justice Department estimates, the Dallas Morning News reported. Eighteen out of 20 unaccompanied migrant children from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador failed to turn up for their immigration hearing in Dallas one day this week, the newspaper said."

Wow, that’s brutal, delivered to parents only to go vapor like ghosts. Well, let’s ask another conservative….. According to Conservative Musings, who you know I believe... "Juan Osuna, who heads the Justice Department’s immigration courts, told a congressional committee recently that, on average, 46 percent of juvenile migrants miss their immigration court hearings, according to the Morning News." Uh oh, a guy in the know don't agree, but he's Latino....... The actual answer is no one knows.

And look at the Dogman’s numbers, they’re HUGE, like his tall tail: "Homeland Security has estimated that 100,000 juveniles have entered the U.S. illegally without a parent in the last two fiscal years, which would mean that 46,000 of them were or will be no-shows at deportation hearings."

According to HHS, the number is really 85,000 for 2013 and 2014 with 60,000 of that estimated for 2014. There’s an average of 7,000 per year 2003-2011, so me thinks CMusings rounds up...... a lot to inflate the importance of the other non-factual musings. The 80% no-show number brandished by Republican

Representatives Graham, Flake, and McCain can be attributed as an anecdote from a LA Sherriff's senior detective. Basically just some guy. Of course it can't be substantiated, even in LA, and according to "Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., who is a member of House Speaker John Boehner's working group on the border crisis, said he doesn't think there is enough data available to hazard guesses about how many of the unaccompanied minors who have recently entered the country can be expected to show up to hearings" The Arizona Republic

What can I say: the dog is BUSTED again. Boat is sunk.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

you misread the sentence, go back and try again, (maybe you should have stayed in school?) you missed it; it is accurate . . . . .

the law has two exceptions, the second one is being exploited by Obama and his minions (that includes you)

the law is being disregarded on purpose by an out of control president.

read what's there and it's plain to see

you keep buying into the spin from the oval office, and the MSM and it's past time you woke up and smelled the coffee.

these kids are not being deported, it's just not happening, they get here and they stay forever. they skip their hearings and not held accountable, just released into the wild like little butterflies

"Deportation records show a steady decline in the number of youths (under age 18) removed from 2008 to 2013. The number of Central American minors deported declined despite the increased number of minors arriving over the last several years. The records confirm that very few of the tens of thousands of Central Americans apprehended by the Border Patrol or ICE in recent years have been sent home, suggesting that the aspirations of tens of thousands of Central Americans now surging across the border are based on a realistic assessment of their chances to remain in the United States"

once they get here, they know they can stay, and that motivates even more to make the attempt, and you can lay this right at Obama's doorstep, he wants this to happen.

wake up now, and smell the coffee, you need more. and quit misreading things on purpose, you can;t make this better by pontificating in your usual OCD bloviatic ways

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

2. if minor children arrive with family or are unaccompanied and are delivered to a parent or guardian already in the US then they are not considered to be part of a sex trafficking ring and are to be barred from entry. they are to be deported if given to family members.

There is nothing being expolited nor is there anything illegal being done. Yes they will be deported but there is a legal process that needs to be followed. If they arive with family then they are not considered to be part of the sex trafficking ring and are barred from entering. If they are unaccompanied and are delived to a parent or guardian already here then they will be deported once their deportation hearing takes place. The Later is the most common thing happening here and we are in the middle of that process.

darwin darwin
Aug '14

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PI8rCleTbSo

Priceless...especially Rand Paul dropping his burger and heading for the door.

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Just saw on you tube, a tractor trailer driver, is driving over the border, gets to the check point, the guard asks, anyone on board but you? The driver says, does it matter, the guard says not really! Does anyone give a crap to whats going on? It could have been a truck full of terrorists , nobody checked, how about some Ebola?Great job border patrol,looks like there trying to cut your pension! Please view this on facebook!


The Wilberforce law states, in relevant part:

"Any unaccompanied alien child sought to be removed by the Department of Homeland Security, except for an unaccompanied alien child from a contiguous country (i.e. Mexico -- or Canada, so as not to sound discriminatory) ... shall be -- placed in removal proceedings ... eligible for relief ... at no cost to the child and provided access to counsel."

Obviously, that's the whole ball of wax. Once a kid is in, given La Raza attorneys and a hearing date, he's never going home. No immigration judge is going to listen to a lawyer-manufactured sob story and say, "No, I'm sorry, that didn't touch my heart. You have to go back to Huehuetenango."


But the law's definition of "unaccompanied alien child" limits the hearings to kids who have no relatives in the United States. If your relatives live here, the law assumes you're not being sex-trafficked -- you're trying to join them.


Here's the definition -- note subsection (C):


"(g) Definitions


"(2) the term 'unaccompanied alien child' means a child who --


(A) has no lawful immigration status in the United States;


(B) has not attained 18 years of age; and


(C) with respect to whom --


(i) there is no parent or legal guardian in the United States; or (ii) no parent or legal guardian in the United States is available to provide care and physical custody."


The law is not -- as George Will suggested on "Fox News Sunday" -- a general humanitarian mandate allowing all 2 billion poor children of the world to show up at our border and be told, "Welcome to America!" It's a law to combat sex trafficking.


Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Vice President Joe Biden wrote the law -- and Feinstein isn't stupid. She's well aware of illegal immigration. That's why the law specifically excludes two huge categories of illegal aliens from getting hearings: (1) Mexicans; and (2) children who have relatives in the U.S.


Those cases look more like illegal immigration than sex trafficking. (Didn't anyone wonder why Mexican kids are excluded?)


Mexicans make up the lion's share of illegal immigrants in the U.S., and children with relatives already living in the U.S. are probably just trying to rejoin family -- not trying to escape a fiendish kidnapper about to sell them into sex slavery.


According to last Friday's New York Times, almost 90 percent of the 53,000 illegal alien kids given refugee status since October have already been transferred to parents or relatives living in the U.S. By the law's clear terms, those 47,000 kids should have been summarily turned away at the border -- just as Mexican children are.
=========================

quoted from ann coulter;'s weekly column

yes, it's lawless to allow them in in the first place, and that's what Obama is doing, using the liberal mob techniques (with reckless disregard for the law) he learned from violent radicals in his youth (bill ayers) to fundamentally change the United States; he is on a mission, and it shows, and it's wrong, just wrong.

wake up, and smell the coffee, i'm begging you

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Get ready for the new world order! And he will come with the mark of the beast,and the weak will follow him, and the people who do not will suffer great hardship,and have nothing ! The seven crowns of the beast, will be the world powers,destroying each other,and he will take over the earth.And there will be a new world order,by the Prince of Darkness!The bowels of hell are coming through those borders,terrorists , from everywhere , hundreds of thousands, in every corner of the United States, all in favor of the beast,and will do whatever he says, because they never lived this good! This is no mistake, this not fire and brimstone, think about it.Are you running Obama care, or is Obama care running, you.can you break the law, only he can,and nobody does anything.Can you change the out come ? No you cant , he is doing everything he wants to, and laughs at Congress,and laughs at us.Now he wants to layoff the military,ask yourself why ?


Lobo, they might as well send border patrol home...smh


http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/164575-one-question-trucker-crossing-border-sums-illegal-immigration-crisis-become/

LV Mom
Aug '14

BDog: veni, vidi, rereadi, vici. Sorry, u be wrong, again. What Darwin says is what I said which means you are incorrect. You never read the law and your cut n paste does not even pass the sniff test for life. It does not make sense as noted above. And, of course, I dare you to find those words even in the law.

Regarding more illegal kids staying; Duh, one word ---- DACA: that's another issue we have been discussing and these are good kids with credentials as noted above who have been in the US for close to a decade. They have been coming in at a rate of 7K per year for the last 10-plus years versus the current, yet different, crisis of 60K this year. These are not DACA kids and DACA does not apply nor will it.

Regarding: "Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Vice President Joe Biden wrote the law -- and Feinstein isn't stupid" Well, that's nice but the "reauthorization" portion of the bill was sponsored by Biden, co-sponsored by Feinstein and three other Dems along with Orin Hatch (R) and Sam Brownback (R). Oh yeah, minor point, this bill never came out of committee. BUSTED

The actual law you should have used, the correct one, was sponsored by Howard Berman (D) and co-sponsored by 3 dems (none of which was Biden or Feinstein) and 3 repubs including: Jeff Fortenberry, R-NE1], Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, [R-FL18], Chris Smith, [R-NJ4]. The Senate at that time was virtually 50/50, not Dem controlled, and the House was 56%/47% dem/repub so not a democratic railroad; split congress at best with the Senate dead even. Good try, but BUSTED again.

However, these later versions are reauthorizations of the original 2000 Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 passed under Clinton in 2000. Gee, that one, the original, upon which the reauthorizations were written, was sponsored by Mr. Smith from NJ, a Republican, and co-sponsors included: 19 Republicans, 17 democrats and an independent. So the real writers of the majority of the bill, uh oh, Republicans back before you became Republicants.

Not exactly as BDog portrayed. Now BDogs opinions are his own but please desist with your rude portrayals especially when I am just laying out some facts, with sources noted, to correct your error-prone cuts n pastes.

Crikey, I even said the first bill of this House for the $659M should pass.

But wrong is wrong and your facts are just plain dead stupid wrong. Still can have your opinions though.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

daca is another lawless action by an out of control obama who has no regard for the rule of law except when it suits his purposes, he ignores laws whenever he wants to at his own whim,


"the President does not have the authority to waive immigration law, nor does he have the authority to create it out of thin air, and he's done both with these Morton memos in this respect"

Steve King

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

hey macgoggle - facts were right, you just didn't like them, and were sourced , not plagiarized like you continue to do, even to this very day, i know what the law says and schooled you in it because you (and most other's on here) obviously did not know it as you have bought hook line and sinker the lies coming from the whitehouse and the MSM, and you're still doing it! (WOW!) let me know when you wake up,

from coulter's article: "According to last Friday's New York Times, almost 90 percent of the 53,000 illegal alien kids given refugee status since October have already been transferred to parents or relatives living in the U.S. By the law's clear terms, those 47,000 kids should have been summarily turned away at the border -- just as Mexican children are."

that's Obama's lawlessness in action, purely, and he doesn't care about the rule of law, clearly:

"By the law's clear terms, those 47,000 kids should have been summarily turned away at the border -- just as Mexican children are."

lawless is as lawless does, no endless pontificating with your usual drivel will fix that

daca is another lawless overreach by this failed president, Obama does not get to decide by himself what is legal and what is not illegal, that's lawless of him to do so.

so once more, you be busted again, as you have been so many times in the past, (and you can't read and understand what was written very well, so please for the love of god, stay in school) you missed what was written on purpose in your typical bloviated Obsessive Compulsive Disorder knee jerk reaction rush to fill up all of the space with more of your pathetic googledygook and if it wasn't so laughable it would be sad really, quite sad, but as i said, it's laughable.

it's no wonder you are having these difficulties, you can't read, and you can't understand what it is you just read. reading comprehension is not your strong suit, btw, you saw nothing and conquered even less, but that's typically in character for you. only thing you conquered is in your own addled mind.

no apologies will be necessary from you as you are incapable of being truly apologetic, it's just not part of your genetic makeup. but you are forgiven for it, i forgive you, it's no biggie, as it's my mistake really because i forgot to heed the sign: "Don't feed the resident Troll", so that's on me, but no worries, it won't happen again

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Brodog, well, you are getting better at the sourcing. Too bad you insist on continuing to name call as if that makes your "facts" more correct. Rudeness does not make right.

Like I said, find where the law states this yourself, so far you can't.

And while you're at it, find where I have plagiarized recently and post that to if you can.

You can't find this stipulation in the law but persist in quoting others who are misreading the law. The law, sponsored and co-sponsored and voted in by Republicans, the last reauthorization under a Republican President, states that unaccompanied minors will be held until a deportation trial is held. In lieu of holding them at Federal facilities, they may be transferred to parents or guardians while awaiting the deportation hearing. This takes them off the taxpayers bill for that period, although they do get immunized before. As to the disposition of the hearing and how existing US parents play into that, I do not know, but that is the process timeline, according to the law.

Transferred awaiting deportation hearing is not citizenship but only temporary housing but no where does the law state "refusal of entry due to parent in country."

So basically Coulter and you are upset now that the government is being efficient at following the law and reducing taxpayer expense.

On the second topic which I now note you see as separate, that's good. You may not like Obama's DACA Executive Order but it has not yet been proven illegal nor has it been legally challenged. Since Boehner and the House just brought suit over Obama's Executive Orders and it was not included, apparently it is not obviously illegal to them.

DACA does not apply to these children arriving in 2013 or 2014 and is not US citizenship but IS deferred action against deportation for two years, subject to renewal. DACA is not an automatic path to citizenship. And deferred deporation actions are not new. John Lennon was one of the first "immigrants" to use the courts to gain deferred action against deportation when his clever lawyer paused and found the clause in the laws. Since then it has been used but only in individual cases onesy twosey before DACA. The first unaccompanied child was done in 2009. http://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/consideration-deferred-action-childhood-arrivals-daca

DACA was included in the bipartisan DREAM act which failed post the Tea Party allegiance to getting nothing done.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Everyone calm down, they just sent the border patrol home, there was nothing to do,so they have the rest of the summer off !


I have to say. I like John Stewart's solution to the Border problem dress the border patrol like Canadian Mounties the people will think they walked to far and turnaround

oldred
Aug '14

We have a Marine in Mexico,Obama won't get him out, couldn't we trade 15 million illegals for him? Any retired Marines want to go get him?


Border agent morale at all time low as under age gang members are released into the US.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/384774/border-agent-morale-all-time-low-right-now-andrew-johnson

Skippy Skippy
Aug '14

Texas Department of Public Safety picking up border patrol duties:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/07/us/texas-is-accused-of-overreaching-and-overspending-to-police-border.html

Skippy Skippy
Aug '14

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/08/06/public-schools-immigrant-children/13661353/

1504 of the immigrant children will be enrolled in NJ schools at taxpayer cost.

Skippy Skippy
Aug '14

Do you actually read the articles or just the headlines?

darwin darwin
Aug '14

Found this interesting link on the Drudge Report:

Border Patrol Agent: Federal Government Releasing Murderers Into US « CBS DC

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/08/07/border-patrol-agent-federal-government-releasing-murderers-into-us

Skippy Skippy
Aug '14

Skippy, too bad we won't be told their legal status once they commit murder here in the US. HL'ers don't think it's important fact anyway...

LV Mom
Aug '14

Agreed - we need to stop the influx now

Skippy Skippy
Aug '14

We have LOTS of 'crises' going on here and if you think its because of incompetence you are a 'useful idiot' and are part of the problem....(mg)

We are being invaded and we are at war with......'''''ourselves''''. Until we wake up more of our Walking Dead we will NOT stop the influx! This is our number one problem

http://www.teaparty.org/george-soros-shadow-party-behind-crises-take-america-47789/?fb_action_ids=801573889883255&fb_action_types=og.comments&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71NXb-I-06c&feature=share This man is our Greatest threat!

I dont doubt that this might be the year that our dollar dies! I have never been a prepper but I think it IS time to prep!


http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/U-SRussia-air-incursions/2014/08/07/id/587499/?ns_mail_uid=28499828&ns_mail_job=1580662_08072014&s=al&dkt_nbr=i6ulygte

Better to be safe than sorry!

Also we need to get more people involved at the local level!
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE IMMIGRATION CRISES by Scott Garrett

https://www.facebook.com/repscottgarrett
Make your voices known!

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

Here is another one of our #1 Crises in America!


Vote Fraud:
The Foxes Are Guarding The Hen House


by Lotus

The foxes I am referring to are frequently the county and city clerks, and Secretaries of State. The hens are our ballots.

We are increasingly expected to simply trust these officials. Yet these same officials have allowed our election process to be terribly compromised by purchasing vote counting computers that increasingly are designed to facilitate vote fraud. They have eliminate any meaningful roll for poll watchers, and in some cases have developed an incestuous relationship with vote counting computer vendors.

Clerks and secretary of states are not neutral independent officials. They are either elected or appointed depending on the office they occupy and where it is located. The clerks and Secretaries of State are the people currently in power. Election judges and other election officials are usually selected by the clerks so that almost none of the people running elections is independent; and none of the election officials represent the interests of those who are not in power and are running for office, or are supporting a ballot proposal.

In the past, probably because of vote fraud, the position of poll watcher was created so that there would be people present at elections to observe the vote count, people who were not selected by those in power. Individuals who are running for office, or individuals who have initiated a ballot proposal that is being voted on, at least here in Colorado , select the Poll watchers. However, when black boxes are used to count the ballots (assuming there are ballots), i.e., when computers with secret software count the ballots, all that the poll watchers get to see is ballots being put into the black box, into the computer. The poll watchers are not allowed to see a vote count any more. The poll watchers have no idea how the votes are being counted, or whether or not the count is accurate. Almost all clerks have gone along with this slight of hand, with eliminating the all important roll of poll watchers in elections observing an actual vote count.
Clerks and Secretaries of State have become experts at smoke and mirrors.

Read the rest here: http://wesavedemocracy.org/foxes.shtm

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

And last but not the LEAST 'SCARY' CRISES is the one everyone wants to ignore:

http://therightscoop.com/dennis-miller-dismisses-walid-shoebats-argument-about-obama-and-his-terrorist-family/

scary stuff when people that know the TRUTH are shoveled under the rug!

"When we try to formulate a conception of Adolph Hitler as the German people know him we must not forget that their knowledge of him is limited by a controlled press."

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

If you ask me the price of beer is becoming a crisis.

jerseycash5
Aug '14

sha44ss, George Soros is the most powerfully man in the world in my life time and most people don't know who he is. Through money, he brings down nations. He single handily brought down the Bank Of England.

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Price of Beer, how about the price of Bacon, over $7 dollars a pound, highest price in over 30 years, and they say there is no infaltion.

kb2755 kb2755
Aug '14

kb, I'm sure that many here will blame Obama for that as well...but the here's the facts: (From USA Today)

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Prices for ribs, chops, hams and other pork products in the grocery store are expected to climb as much as 15 percent this summer as supplies are slashed by a new swine virus that's sweeping the country.

That's tough news for consumers, also facing rapidly rising prices for beef. The disease hits just as pork producers are recovering from high corn prices.

The situation is critical for Iowa, the nation's largest producer of pigs. Iowa producers generate about $7 billion in sales and employ about 39,000 workers caring for the state's 20.5 million animals.

So far, producers in 26 states have reported infected herds with the highly contagious porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, known as PEDv. The virus is fatal to piglets. In less than a year, losses are estimated at 5 million.

"It's going to have a profound impact on supplies this summer," said Steve Meyer, an analyst at Paragon Economics in Adel. "Prices are going to get significantly higher."

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

Wow sha44ss, think you took this one right over the ledge and into the land of tin foil. Ever notice how you are all alone in the elevator?

FYI and for the record: Scott Garrett votes:
HR 2620 --- YEA
HR 7311 --- Voice Vote yea, house, unanimous Senate

For the most part, Garrett has voted for the current situation.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Strange, I thought the Bank of England still is there?

Yes, they suffered and Soros profited but it wasn't as if he didn't warn them and he made 1B in pounds. Or that he was not the only profiteer.

Amazing that you care about the troubles of a "socialist" country now.

Or that you don't note is 530M pound loss in Japan. Was he protecting them?

If you don't like the Soros story then move to stop currency speculation; good luck.

Koch Bros did oil, think there's any speculation or robber baron-ing going on there? Now they own everything so if you want to bring them down: there's an ap for that: http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/08/07/target-makes-gay-marriage-support-official-after-gop-donation-gaffe/

Yes, now you can purchase politically correct depending on your affiliation: http://www.buycott.com/

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

THE MOST IMPORTANT READ OF THE WEEK: GAMECHANGER: THIS IS THE ENEMY!
**''Gamechanger is the Brother of Journolist and another secretive Leftwing network. The same old crowd with new faces mixed in is pushing the same Progressive/Marxist agenda. And through propaganda and media manipulation, they have helped Barack Obama bring the freest nation in the world to her knees. Gamechanger is another face of the enemy of freedom and the members of the group are foot soldiers for Marxism. And you wonder why they all have the same talking points!"

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2014/08/07/brother-of-journolist-secretive-leftwing-network-redux/

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

so let's them all come in here so wages can be depressed even further.

it's a good move if you want to cripple the middle class and drive black unemployment even higher than it is right now. .

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Yes the Koch Bros are pikers compared to George. The Koch Bros are mostly domestic crooks. Soros has a world goal.

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Sean Hannity's exclusive one on one with netanyahu!

http://video.foxnews.com/v/3720267966001/exclusive-one-on-one-with-benjamin-netanyahu/#sp=show-clip

On that note I leave you to go spend time with my family!

and pray for our Country and for God to protect us once again from the EVIL that is falling upon US all!


GOD BLESS AMERICA! from the Greatest and most Patriotic Generation that ever lived!

http://nj1015.com/john-wayne-and-other-celebrities-sing-god-bless-america/

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

KOCH BROTHERS DONATE 25 MILLION TO UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND

http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2014/aug/07/placing-kids-above-politics/

Where is Obamas Donation?

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

The Obama's give between 12% - 24% of their AGI to charity; what percent is Koch giving? In 2012, over 50% of his charitable contributions went to Fisher House Foundation, which provides humanitarian services to military members, veterans and their families. And yes, he donated to the United Negro Fund, and educational assistance foundation. Wonder what percentage the Koch Bro's?

But to make the false ascertain that the Koch's support black causes and the Obama's don't is stupid because you can't find a donation is stupid. Next time, look before you type. BUSTED.

And you are right, Soros is global, but his contributions are varied: http://www.georgesoros.com/faqs/entry/georgesorosphilanthropyisunprecedented/

While Koch may be mostly domestic in charity, he is far from just staying at home. Also, many Koch contributions was quasi mercenary being in R&D for things that Koch Bro's would no likely product-ise once the research paid off. Things like water desalinization and the such. Even the Koch funded political agenda is as much about money as it is conservatism.

Perhaps that's where Soros and Koch look like different brothers from the same mother. And the rest is just footwork.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

The firm employs 50,000 people in the United States and another 20,000 in 59 other countries.
In 2013, Forbes called it the second largest privately held company in the United States (after Cargill), with an annual revenue of $115 billion, down from the largest in 2006. If Koch Industries were a public company in 2013, it would have ranked 17 in the Fortune 500.
A nice return on 70,000 employees. Since it's private they don't worry about stock holders and market crashes.
I read the founder started the Cat Cracking Refining process.Could not get it started in this country and went to Russia so he knew what Communism was about and came back to this country. I guess the kids remember what Grandpa said and got into politics to keep it from coming here.

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

From your Post Mister G>>"Even the Koch funded political agenda is as much about money as it is conservatism"

Progressives such as yourself...believe that Capitalism and Conservatism is evil!

When you defend George Soro's do you even know what you are defending? Do you know what his OPEN SOCIETY is?

It is Communism Mr. G!! Are you a Communist?

sha44ss sha44ss
Aug '14

This thread has taken a sharp right turn into crazy town.

Gadfly Gadfly
Aug '14

I think questioning my capitalist beliefs because I pointed out that Soros was a speculator which is probably one of the purest forms of capitalism seems strange.

And whether Soros was attempting to bring down capitalism in England which most of you call socialist anyway seems a weak attempt to destroy capitalism considering The Bank of England is still there and England is as socialist as you ever thought they were.

Again, Soros and Koch Bro's may look like they are trying to establish their "order" but really it's just about money. Both are pushing agendas that they think will profit them in the long run. Soros may talk Open World, but he does not act it. Koch may talk free market capitalism and conservatism but many of their actions go against conservative agendas.

No I am not a communist, a Marxist or any other convenient demeaning label you like. And certainly not a useful idiot. But capitalism and social programs are not mutually exclusive no matter what loony links you come up with. If a church has a social program it's godly. If a citizen starts a social program, it's philanthropic. If the government has one, it's socialism?

Somehow in all of this we have lost "Government by the people, for the people." I say "shall not perish from this Earth."

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Philanthropy is FREE will. Governments involvement is control when it's job is to protect the nation. They don't do either very well or as efficient Philanthropy that's gained through capitalism. .

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Our government is free will; we vote how we want, they vote how they want. Since when is a social program not protecting the country?

Let's see, if I remember......"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." hmmm, this I see domestic tranquility, general welfare and securing the blessings of liberty in there somewhere along with defense.

And once you get though the Congressional make-up, the first section talking about non-congressional stuff, Section 8 says: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States" hmmmm, collect taxes to provide for the general welfare as well as defense.

And as far as efficiency, there are as many efficient government programs as there are failed business ventures. Sure, there are some monumental failures and like any HUGE organization, excesses can seem the norm. But sometimes that's the beauty of government: sometimes they are like James T. Kirk and ".... a great one for rushing in where angels fear to tread" being able to take grand risks and get things done that the private ventures can't. You can pick your own examples.

But the concept that government is bad at everything is easy to spout yet mistaken in fact.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

. The voters got what they want and that's the final say. We are where we are. Just like England, Surf's to the Crown. (Government) They have a lot more public housing and your beloved health care. It dose allows for a lot more free time and less responsibilities. They are always on Holiday. I am thankful I think I lived in the best of times this country had to offer. If I were young today, I think I would be thinking of moving on as my Grandparents did. Since this is becoming a rich and poor country, I have no desire to be rich.

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Old Gent,


" If I were young today, I think I would be thinking of moving on as my Grandparents did" I feel the same.

The extreme liberal left is going to be the damnation of this country.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10203900770857211

ignatz ignatz
Aug '14

More frightening news from the Onion--- BD, is your first name Jerry?

WASHINGTON—According to a Census Bureau report released Thursday, Hispanics are now projected to make up the majority of the U.S. populace by the middle of local father-in-law Jerry Stambaugh’s rant. “We found that Latinos are on track to outnumber whites in this country as early as when Jerry starts in on how they’re taking all the jobs and how there are too many of them already,” said Census Bureau associate director for field operations William H. Hatcher Jr., adding that, if the pace of immigration accelerates, the historic demographic shift may even occur by the time the 58-year-old father-in-law’s tirade reveals Hispanics breed like rabbits and drain the country’s valuable resources. “Our research suggests that, further down the road, when he angrily launches into how things were a hell of a lot different when he was growing up, the Latino population may reach upwards of 55 or even 60 percent of the nation’s population. Even our most conservative estimates posit a Hispanic majority before Stambaugh declares how those people should just go back to their own country.” Experts further projected that no real Americans would be left in the country by the end of Stambaugh’s epithet-filled ramblings.

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

It's almost here. The Me generation are not having children thanks to the pill.
http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2014/08/10/white-students-no-longer-to-be-majority-in-school-n1877068

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

Well, women now not only outnumber men in college but are 33% more likely to get a degree.

Where can the old white men deport all these smarty skirts so we can marry the young uneducated latinos and create our new anglatino nation?

I know the founding fathers were in to mixing it up regularly, shouldn't it be the old white man's turn?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Why don't we end this topic?Just read everything on this thread,and we all sound like Congress,Obama would be proud of us,just talking and not saying or doing anything! We talk stats,we quote what we read,and point fingers! So do we have the answers,or are we just forwarding the news?Let's move on,nothing will change.Do you think the Government is listening or reading this,we are a blip on the screen.Just get ready for English as a second language in our school system! That's not a joke!


seems that the need for schooling continues ;

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, an architect of the Wilberforce act, said the White House does not require more authority from Congress to ramp up the deportations process.

"That law already provides the administration with flexibility to accelerate the judicial process in times of crisis," she said. "The administration should use that flexibility to speed up the system while still treating these children humanely, with compassion and respect."

http://www.newsmax.com/US/child-immigrants-sex-trafficking-border-illegal/2014/07/08/id/581339#ixzz39cvb39pW



the 2008 trafficking law is largely inapplicable to the massive smuggling problem occurring along the U.S. border. -

the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 — (sic - named after Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein's Wilberforce act) a law aimed, in part, at "unaccompanied alien children" who are victims of trafficking — appears to have little applicability to the current situation on the border. As such, the Obama administration should not be applying the law and granting protections that are supposed to benefit trafficking victims to people who are willing participants in human smuggling operations.

it appears that a significant majority of children coming across our borders illegally are not "unaccompanied alien children" according to the definition found in federal law. Federal law defines an "unaccompanied alien child" as an illegal alien under the age of 18 who is without "a parent or legal guardian in the United States." Data from government agencies suggest that the overwhelming majority of minors arriving on the U.S. border have family in the United States.

According to advocates and media reports, around 90 percent of non-Mexican and non-Canadian children coming across the border are placed with family or guardians in the United States. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia Burwell recently testified that approximately 55 percent of released alien children are released to parents and another 30 percent are released to other family members, bringing the total to 85 percent of such children being released to family. Mark Greenberg, acting assistant secretary within HHS, recently testified that, thus far in fiscal year 2014, approximately 95 percent of children released went to a parent, relative or non-relative sponsor

there is little evidence that the recent arrivals are victims of trafficking, which generally involves coercion. Instead, families and their children are willing participants in smuggling operations, having paid smugglers to bring them into the United States. As U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement explains, "Human trafficking and human smuggling are distinct criminal activities, and the terms are not interchangeable." Yet the aim of the 2008 trafficking law (and related laws) is to prevent people from becoming victims of human trafficking and to protect women and children who are often the targets of human traffickers. The Trafficking Victims Protections Act of 2000 explains that a "victim of trafficking" is a person subjected to an act or practice such as sex trafficking or "involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery."

While it is likely that some of the illegal immigrants who have recently arrived at the U.S. border were subject to difficult, if not horrific, situations, it is incorrect to refer to them as "victims of trafficking" and apply trafficking laws without evidence that they are, in fact, victims of trafficking.

Third, even if all people coming across the border illegally were "unaccompanied alien children" and victims of trafficking, the 2008 act includes language that gives the president some leeway in its application. The law requires "[e]xcept in the case of exceptional circumstances" that any department or agency of the federal government that has an unaccompanied alien child in custody to transfer the custody of such child to the HHS secretary within 72 hours after determining that such child is, in fact, an unaccompanied alien child. The HHS provides additional benefits to the individuals. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) recently told Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson at a Senate hearing that the "exceptional circumstances" provision would allow President Obama discretion in how the law is applied in light of the current influx of illegal immigration. In other words, the law does not necessarily require that all recently arrived illegal immigrants receive a day in court.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/213167-trafficking-law-largely-inapplicable-to-border-crisis#ixzz39ctPXAXK

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

You can't have it both ways: the law is the law and keeping these kids off the taxpayer's dime for housing seems to be saving money.

Congress needs to change the law instead of taking vacations.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

schooling continues unabated due to necessity and comprehension deficits:


Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Feinstein Amendment to Protect Unaccompanied Alien Children

Washington, DC – The Senate Judiciary Committee today approved legislation sponsored by U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) that would reform the treatment of unaccompanied immigrant children who are in federal immigration custody.

“This legislation will ensure that unaccompanied children receive humane and appropriate treatment while in the custody of the United States government,” Senator Feinstein said. “It would give unaccompanied minors access to pro bono legal counsel and someone to look after their best interest. I’ve been working on this legislation for seven years. It is time for it to become law.”

http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=7b292e44-b306-86d0-a0b4-981389abaf5d

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Are you just posting news articles or are you somehow implying an opinion?

"This legislation will ensure that unaccompanied children receive humane and appropriate treatment while in the custody of the United States government,”

seems like a reasonable thing for our government to do, no?

darwin darwin
Aug '14

Hey Dog, does a bill coming out of committee make it law?

Do you have an actual bill number?

What are you talking about and do you have a point?

Didn't we do this already except with Biden thrown in?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

education is still needed; don't know what is so hard to understand about this, it's pretty straightforward:

"better information about the demographics of people coming across the U.S. border would be helpful in crafting the appropriate political and legal response, but thus far the Obama administration has not been forthcoming with information. From the information available, it appears that the 2008 trafficking law is largely inapplicable to the massive smuggling problem occurring along the U.S. border."

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/213167-trafficking-law-largely-inapplicable-to-border-crisis#ixzz39ctPXAXK

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Nice to see that in lieu of information and facts, they can still form a conclusion.

Well, seeing that the conclusion fit the preconceived paradigm, it was pretty straightforward to them. And some call that education.

"having lost sight of our objective, we decided to redouble our efforts."

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

from the linked article; here's a little more classwork for the motivated student:


Mark Greenberg, acting assistant secretary within HHS, recently testified that, thus far in fiscal year 2014, approximately 95 percent of children released went to a parent, relative or non-relative sponsor

there is little evidence that the recent arrivals are victims of trafficking, which generally involves coercion. Instead, families and their children are willing participants in smuggling operations, having paid smugglers to bring them into the United States. As U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement explains, "Human trafficking and human smuggling are distinct criminal activities, and the terms are not interchangeable."

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

you repeat yourself when under stress, you repeat yourself under duress.........

due process is due process.

the Republicans didn't put a stipulation in the law that reads "please return kids immediately if parent on board."

silly conservatives.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

it'd clear that unlearned lessons need re-emphasis; a remedial education is required for the slower students among us, and it is plain to see that there are some very slow learners who are holding back the rest of the class; we shouldn't mainstream those poor souls (god bless them) who can't keep up :

As U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement explains, "Human trafficking and human smuggling are distinct criminal activities, and the terms are not interchangeable."

"Deportation records show a steady decline in the number of youths (under age 18) removed from 2008 to 2013. The number of Central American minors deported declined despite the increased number of minors arriving over the last several years. The records confirm that very few of the tens of thousands of Central Americans apprehended by the Border Patrol or ICE in recent years have been sent home, suggesting that the aspirations of tens of thousands of Central Americans now surging across the border are based on a realistic assessment of their chances to remain in the United States"

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) recently told Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson at a Senate hearing that the "exceptional circumstances" provision would allow President Obama discretion in how the law is applied in light of the current influx of illegal immigration. In other words, the law does not necessarily require that all recently arrived illegal immigrants receive a day in court.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

OK, you pretend you are quoting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement but you have not sourced your quotes from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) which owns the passage you pasted. That seems a bit misleading.

CIS is a non-profit research group providing info to policy makers and interested parties like the Dog. It is partisan, conservative, and oft noted for factual errors and ties to conservative extremist groups. Even the WSJ tied CIS to some pretty wacked white supremacist organizations. Recently CIS sanctioned its own senior analyst for saying: "the US should ban Muslim immigration because "Muslims believe in things that are subversive to the Constitution", called immigration reform "a plot against America" and Republicans who support it "psychotic," and of President Barack Obama that "being hung, drawn and quartered is probably too good for him." (WIKI).

That said, the fact that less children are being deported is true. What is not certain, and time will tell, is whether vast numbers of the current influx will stay versus being deported. CIS and Dog conclusions ring less true due to the complexity of the situation and timing issues. For example, from the Bipartisan Policy Center:

Dog data ignores children from contiguous countries returned immediately. That's over 50% of the total deportations for the past five years.

Dog data ignores children arriving but deported after the age of 18. That's 25% of the total deportations for the past five years.

Dog misses that fact that: of the children who remain, "As of June 2014, about 61 percent of the immigration court cases filed for Northern Triangle juveniles since FY 2009 were still pending, with much higher rates for recent years."

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/immigration/2014/07/25/us-child-deportations

The fact is that deportation of children is a slow, messy process, that might take a year or years to conclude in our courts. Using this years influx to fan anti-immigration fears with the hope of abandoning legal proceedings in lieu of immediate deportation is BDog's and CIS's opinion.

However, a more compassionate recourse might be to expedite the discovery of whether these kids are at risk and deserve asylum before kicking them out. Of course, that takes resources and money. One might even suggest that would be more compassionate for our Mexican neighbors as well or at least set up a returned-country process, owned by Mexico, that could verify the risk status before accepting the returning kids.

Same problem, two approaches, but for CIS to conclude that this current flood is hear to stay does not match the facts; it's a timing game that CIS is using to fan the fears.

Now to Fienstein: what she actually said was that HHS and DHS might define "exceptional" circumstances to increase the 72-hour window before unaccompanied children are put "in custody of the Secretary of HHS." This is a long way from "the law does not necessarily require that all recently arrived illegal immigrants receive a day in court." But once again, the Dog and CIS grab a sound byte out of context to conflate it into their preconceived paradigms to provide proof-positive of their desire to end all immigration to the US to be able to retain white supremacy (see I can take a tid bit and run with it too!)

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Why the fuss. It's simple really, either you believe that those children coming here to escape violence, crime and intimidation to stay with family members who are already here is a humane and good thing - or you don't. You get to live with yourself however you feel. Personally, I would take the Pope's view - a) can I walk in others shoes and b) who am I to judge. If my kids were in danger and I could send them to live with my sister or brother, attend school in the US and escape being kidnapped and held for ranson, or worse - I'd do it. Many facing that same issue in Colombia in the late 1980s did the same thing. Only then they were allowed to stay as refugees. My - how times have changed.

Stephan Stephan
Aug '14

i see the slow students among us keep missing the forest for the trees,

all my quotes are linked in the posts above, (go back up the thread and check) unlike yours which are not sourced, not linked and then paraphrased by you to look like your own work when it's just plagiarizing once again other's statements. (hint: it's not working, we know who you really are, you have been caught before doing this but continue to embarrass yourself thinking you are somehow mmore clever. another hint for you: you are only fooling yourself, and that makes you self-delusional, like most of your kind)

here is some more homework for HL's resident slow learner who learns at a troll's pace:

Attkisson: Border Patrol Says They’re Told 'Let as Many People Go as Possible'

Former CBS News Correspondent and senior contributor to The Daily Signal said Border Patrol officers she has spoken to say they are being told to “let as many people go as possible.”
“Whether spoken or unspoken, there is a policy coming from the top, that they’re basically to be very lenient and try to let as many people go as possible, that’s what they think, that’s the message they think they’re receiving,” she stated on Thursday’s broadcast of “The Laura Ingraham Show.” She added that agents she has talked to believe “they’re being told not to do the job.”

Attkisson also reported that some of the court dates being given to illegal immigrants in the United States are for dates in 10 years, reporting, “I spoke to a member of Congress, if I understood him correctly, who said some of the court dates being given are 10 years out.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/08/14/Attkisson-Border-Patrol-Says-Theyre-Told-Let-as-Many-People-Go-as-Possible

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

You are right, I did paraphrase which is not plagiarize and my source is listed at the beginning of the paraphrase and the link is listed immediately thereafter.

Unlike your post immediately above to which I was referring where you have some quote marks but no source and no link.

Every other post from me on this one is sourced and linked where appropriate.

My plagiarism to which you refer was early on, I apologized, and perhaps after a year or two, you could just let it go.

Nice defense via offense though. BUSTED

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

ignoring the problems at the border are not in our best interests; the 1,500 plus illegal immigrant children dumped off on NJ by the feds will cost roughly 22 million dollars per year to educate in our public schools; over 12 years that's at least another 264 million dollars, and that's at today's average cost per student, that avg cost increases over time, so get ready for a big property tax increase in your local district to cover this cost:


Obama prepares schools for migrant kids


The Obama administration is preparing the nation’s schools to accept thousands of new students who illegally crossed the southwest border and are now awaiting trials on their possible deportations.

A fact sheet from the Department of Education sent to states and schools on Monday highlights the children’s right to attend public school.

It says all children in the United States “are entitled to equal access to a public elementary and secondary education, regardless of their or their parents’ actual or perceived national origin, citizenship, or immigration status.”

The prospect of tens of thousands of children mostly from Central American countries attending school as they wait for their immigration status to be decided has the potential to be explosive after this summer’s emotional public debate about the border.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/215059-obama-prepares-schools-for-enrollment-of-migrant-children#ixzz3AOB3WLLO

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

"ignoring the problems at the border are not in our best interests; the 1,500 plus illegal immigrant children dumped off on NJ by the feds will cost roughly 22 million dollars per year to educate in our public schools; over 12 years that's at least another 264 million dollars, and that's at today's average cost per student, that avg cost increases over time, so get ready for a big property tax increase in your local district to cover this cost."

On the money: NJ has 1.36M kids: 1,500 represents .11% or a tenth of a percent increase. NJ spends about $9B per year, $22M represents .22% or two tenths of a percent, however, the increase would more likely be ZERO.

But do you think you would notice a two tenths of a percent increase in your taxes? Of course there's the 2% tax cap anyway so WTF.

Once again, to make their point, anti-immigration forces use partial data to scare folks to continue their push for what they really want: zero immigration. I am the grandson of immigrants; my wife is the daughter of immigrants. Since 1900, we have worked in the mines, on the railroad, on the farm, in the ghetto, and a variety of other tough jobs to provide a better life for our families and for you for that matter. Immigrants created America and this diversity is the bedrock foundation of our strength and freedoms. Zero immigration ends all that.

Now, these kids will be housed and educated somewhere until the deportation hearing which might be quick, might take a year, might take more. That is the law so either change it or deal with it.

We move these kids when possible, to parents or guardians, which takes them off the taxpayers bill for food and housing. There is no proof that these parents have not been paying school taxes while their kids are out of country. There is no proof that these parents are illegal aliens, and even if they are, that they are not paying school taxes. They might be taxes while their kids are not in the school system they are paying taxes for.

Do we get upset when citizen parents have babies that end up in school? Do we get upset with American parents who have way more kids in school than their tax bill covers? No. We deal with it.

So sure, we have a problem with an influx of illegal kids crossing the boarder. According to The Vera Institute: "Approximately 40 percent of children admitted into ORR custody are identified as eligible for a form of legal relief from removal (such as asylum, special immigrant juvenile status, or visas for victims of crime or
trafficking)." FYI -- this is 2012 data and not necessarily representative of the current influx. But do we want to return kids at risk? Or do we deal with it?

Ultimately, many of the kids will be sent back. According to The Brookings Institute: "Consequently, half the children may eventually be sent home. In the meantime while they await their Court Hearing, they have a right to attend school and access health care, posing costs upon State and District budgets." So sure, it costs money, but compassion always has a price tag. Deal with it.

The simple solution that BDog and his linkages support is immediate return or refusal at the boarder. Remember, at that time the kids are in the hands of human traffickers who pocket about $7,000 for their efforts to get them across the border. Refusal at the border in their hands does not seem to be an option in my book. Once we put kids in custody, we do need to process quickly but a revolving door for kids at risk is just not my way nor do I think, the American way. According to Brookings "There is no easy solution to this complex problem which has existed for over a decade, but whose surge in numbers presents a challenge to U.S. policy makers and resources."

It is complex and BDog's black and white simplistic solution seems cruel abandonment of any level of American compassion. And fanning our fears of illegals taking over America, latinos ending our right to be white, and immigration stealing America's bread and butter make good political fodder. Some of these guys even blame immigration for pollution. The real problems and solutions are more complex.

Here's the Brookings summary of this issue which is fairly apolitical with comprehensive compassionate solutions. I suggest that BDog educate himself with that to get a fuller picture of the problem and potential solutions: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2014/07/02-unaccompanied-children-central-america-negroponte

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

the cost of schooling these 1,500 illegal immigrant children will be at least 267 million dollars extra over 12 years.

that's the simple fact of it , deal with it

local property taxes will have to be raised that amount to cover the costs, and that's at today's average costs, they go up over time so the total will probably be more.

compassion? how about compassion for the out of work americans who are being displaced by low cost foreign workers, where is the compassion for them?

i agree with the Governor Pence of Indiana, doesn't everybody? Where is YOUR compassion?

“While we feel deep compassion for these children, our country must secure its borders and provide for a legal and orderly immigration process,”

“Failure to expedite the return of unaccompanied children thwarts the rule of law and will only continue to send a distorted message that illegally crossing into America is without consequence.”



once they get here, they stay here, forever, skipping court dates, the feds can't even track them, they admit that

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

hey macgoogle! you be wrong again (as usual for you) i happen to be more educated than you are on this subject and that's why i keep schooling you in your lack of education on the matter; sadly you refuse to learn basic facts, being myopically blind, but keep throwing up more spew in your pretzel logic spinning. you spin so much so fast it's no wonder you're nauseous and nauseating all at the same time.

i see all the nuances, understand them more clearly than you do and know it's not black and white (your reverse racism is showing again) as you keep suggesting. in fact your position is black and white and that's alarming in it's hypocrisy. nice try, but you be busticated, again.

wow! the Neanderthal club like approach you take in debates is just stunning, can;t wait to meet up with you in real life, it will be interesting i promise you, so when should we have that cup of coffee together?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

If you expect to meet after that first paragraph.......... Apparently you enjoy nausea. And how can you drink coffee; it's grown south of the border.....

First, nothing I said was factually incorrect. "Wrong" on the facts. Not bloody likely. You might not agree with my opinion and that is your right. But my opinion is not wrong just because it differs from yours. I think you should read the Brookings article; that would correspond to my recommendations which, like yours, call for mitigation of the current problem. It is just implementation where we differ. I choose the Brookings approach, you choose the one sponsored by the zero-immigration people.

As for your facts, just a few misconceptions.......

"the cost of schooling these 1,500 illegal immigrant children will be at least 267 million dollars extra over 12 years."
mg: this is true or at least roughly right. But that's the expense per kid and not the affect on the budget by adding these kids. Perhaps connected but not a linear function.

"local property taxes will have to be raised that amount to cover the costs, and that's at today's average costs, they go up over time so the total will probably be more."
this is not necessarily true at all. First, you can't say a cost increase of two tenths of a percent can't be sucked up. You just don't know but I bet you would suck it up in your own budget before you demanded a raise (especially since that border-crossin, illegal-alien kid is coming fer yer job man). Second, depending on enrollments, we actually might have excess budget if overall enrollments drop. Last year NJ public school enrollments dropped over 100,000 which is a tad more than 1,500 kids for example. Third, the flippin budgets won't go up over 2%, by law, unless 51% of the voters agree whether more kids come in or not. So you know what it costs to educate a kid but you don't have a clue whether these kids, in aggregate, will cause an increase in the budget.

"compassion? how about compassion for the out of work americans who are being displaced by low cost foreign workers, where is the compassion for them?"
mg -- so now you are afraid of kids taking your job? I thought they didn't speak English? Are you also afraid of your neighbor who had more than his fair allotment of kids? Won't they try to steal your job too.

"i agree with the Governor Pence of Indiana, doesn't everybody? Where is YOUR compassion?"
mg - How can anyone disagree with Pence's weasel words. Secure borders, good immigration process, who's to say no to that flag waving rhetoric. The rubber meets the road in implementation and what does Pence mean by "humanly?" versus "expeditiously." Funny that his main priority is for these kids "to be returned expeditiously to their home countries reunited with their families" when the home country of the parents is now the good ole USA. That's expeditious humanity for you.

And then he tops it off with “Failure to expedite the return of unaccompanied children thwarts the rule of law and will only continue to send a distorted message that illegally crossing into America is without consequence.”
mg: uh, Mike, we are following the law when we hold these kids. So you want consequences do you? You want to send a clear message on the backs of these kids OK. What consequence would you suggest for these kids? What message should be sent. Immediately turn them back to the human traffickers that brought them? It's not like returning a candy bar at Walmart Mike. Expeditiously return them to their home country to their parents who are in the U.S. Which is more important, family or get em out of here NOW at any cost? Maybe, just maybe, BDog and Mike, we might just do just a little checking to see if the kids are at risk, deserve asylum, and act both expeditiously as well as with some prudent compassion. Black and white makes good ink though.

Again, if you want to know my recommendations, read the Brookings Institute piece. Otherwise:

"Get 'em out by Friday!
You don't get paid till the last one's well on his way.
Get 'em out by Friday!
It's important that we keep to schedule, there must be no delay."

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

i read that piece, twice, and it's you who keeps spinning your self-constructed 'facts', out of context, assembling unconnected links together that don't go together and then spinning your fantasy yarns that always supports the democrats no matter what. well my myopic fellow poster, you happen to be wrong in your assessment (again), local property taxes will go up to cover the extra cost of these illegal immigrant school kids, and it's obama's open border policy that has caused the SURGE in recent illegal immigration of children, the president didn't have to do it this way, even the staunchly liberal democrat Diane Fienstein has said so , repeatedly and in different settings, the links are above and you and you lib think tank friends ignore all of that. like it never happened. except for of course those things did happen ; and to this very day are still being ignored by you and your close to 80% democrat party sycophants in the MSM

this thread is not just about children, it's about the surge in illegal crossings due to an open border policy enacted by Obama, so by ignoring what you wish to ignore because it doesn't fit your predetermined opinions, you construct a response to points that are not in contention and you respond in detail to points that were never expressed. that's what we call projection. You project too way too much, and you know you are doing it. so that makes you less than honest, your continued use of strawman arguments; and that's bad because it's knowingly being intellectually dishonest, it's a free choice you have made to be purposely intellectually dishonest, and that's a very bad thing, it's a character fault, that i'm guessing is due to a poor upbringing by your parents

it happens to be quite true that the uncontrolled influx of illegal immigrants causes salaries and wages to be depressed. your liberal think tanks links conveniently ignore or minimize the real impact to everyday americans in the middle class who are getting thrown out of work everyday and finding it next to impossible (esp for those over 50 years of age) to find work of any kind, anywhere. you and your ilk have no compassion for them unless there is a republican in the white house, then you're all about what's right for the out-of-work americans; and it's very true that for those libs who still have good paying jobs it's no big deal, so what's everyones else's problem? sucks to be them i guess, right guys?

your lack of compassion for your neighbors and your local community is just stunning in it's hypocrisy.

and on a personal note; it is no surprise to me that you don't have the backbone or strength of character to meet over coffee and have an honest discussion. you just don't have the capacity to do it and that makes just another spineless poster hiding behind the skirts of your name and keyboard. after all these thousands of posts over the years, and all of these discussions you still lack the intellectual honesty to conduct a real conversation.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Nope, my facts are fact, they are honest. You may not like my opinion and that is your right.

It is also your right to launch ad hominem attacks impugning my character, calling names, and even taking the oh so low road of talking trash about my parents. It only reflects on you and your inability to have rationale discussions. When people lose, they abuse. If this is how you ask someone out on a coffee date...... You certainly wouldn't be saying that crud to anyone in person.

To the facts. I am not wrong that a point 2 percent (.2%) cost increase does not necessarily mean a budget increase. It wouldn't in any budget. You are assuming that one will happen, you have not proof of it's guarantee. It is your right to guess, but it's a guess.

You were the one lazar-focused on the illegal kids who took the left turn into job loss while talking about unaccompanied minors from non contiguous countries; I just thought the linkage funny.

But the fact is that the current influx of illegals, old and young, is only HALF of that of 2005. And while up over 130,000 per year from two years ago, two years ago was under Obama's border policy so go figure. Wonder what it looked like for Bush?

According to CNN: "In all, there were 327,577 illegal immigrant apprehensions in 2011, according to the U.S. Border Patrol. This is the lowest number since 1972, when there were 321,326. According to the Department of Homeland Security, the 2011 figure is a 53% drop from 2008, which it says indicates that fewer people are trying to cross the border." http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/13/politics/fact-check-immigration/

Well, think we answered that Bush question.

And you are wrong on the Feinstein quote, it is out of context allowing you to twist the meaning. I provided a fuller text above, read it.

Now there's no doubt we have an immigration problem but it's not as bleak as you allude. We do have a HUGE problem with unaccompanied minors from non contiguous countries, but don't be so naïve as to lay it all on Obama. Remember all those legislators in the do-less-than-Do-Nothing-Congress? At the heat of the influx, it's time to dump a DOA bill and take off for five weeks? Where have they been since 2008, 2010 (Tea Party ascent), 2012......?

Overall Obama's record has been a downward influx, an increased deportation rate, and a screaming for Congress to actually make law. Sure, he could be more persuasive, but at least he's pushing for action. So we have a current problem, one that is fairly recent so let's take some action. I am guessing the kiddie influx rate is already down based on Obama communication actions. But don't fear monger about the great unwashed wave of unaccompanied 50% at risk kids stealing your welfare money, raising your taxes, and taking your job. It ain't necessarily so.

Meanwhile, don't be using schoolyard taunts to try to get your point across. It demeans your words.

And what's wrong with The Brooking's Institute recommendations? Sure sound prudent to me.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

i stand by my assertions, intellectually dishonest as described above is your MO.

and you know it's wrong, but you chose to do it anyways, and that's bad, that's why people chose to not engage with you, because of your predilection for dishonesty by using strawman arguements to respond to points that other posters never made and then declare yourself the victor. that makes you out to be an intellectually dishonest person, and you I think you are smart enough to know that but you proceed to keep doing it anyways like that's the right thing to do. now look, *IF* you were raised right you would realize that it's the wrong thing to do, so you need to be educated about it. if after that you still choose to behave that way, well then that's on you. and you have to own it and be prepared for the consequences of your choices. like with your kids for instance, do you treat them the same way? and don't you have young adults still living at home with you? what's the matter, your adult kids can't find good paying jobs? can't move out of the house on their own? why is that?

now look, facts are facts, but when you interpret them and paraphrase them, spinning them into forms that they they do not represent and therefore self-claiming victory by stating "Busted"; it is as silly as it is pathetic, intelligent readers see this and that's why they stop dealing with dishonest posters such as yourself.

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Geez. Whenever someone disagrees with you and points out factual differences, you launch personal attacks on the author and their entire family even when they believe in your basic premise that an issue with unaccompanied children crossing the border exists but differ on the actions and implementations for remedy.

You malign my parent's and my parenting skills, my kids (whom you act like you know when you are dead wrong), you call me dishonest, you apparently speak for all of HL, yet you don't even offer an example. Pick out this "intellectually dishonest""strawman arguements" that offends you so mightily.

You can stand by your ascertains, but I have pointed out a number of factual mistakes and omissions that you continue to apparently accept as gospel. And no amount of your mudslinging will change that but you can keep throwing your..... stuff against the wall.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

From the inestimable Onion... sounds like BD has a soul mate-

MADEIRA, OH—Shaking his head at the diverse variety of Mexican and Latin American food options being made available to him, area shopper Steve Unger told reporters Friday that the Hispanic food aisle at his local grocery store pretty much told him all he needed to know about where America is heading. “Black beans, tortillas, hot peppers—boy, that’s the whole story right here,” said the visibly dismayed Unger, 49, who recalled a time when Latin American items only constituted about a third of Aisle 14’s offerings at the Kroger on Miami Avenue and America’s dominant position in the world was completely unquestioned. “Look at these names: Goya, Tapatio—it’s the whole damn aisle! How many types of salsa do you need, for crying out loud?” At press time, Unger’s ire had only grown more intense upon passing by a small refrigerated hummus display.

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

BrotherDog, take it easy, your going to have a heart attack! If you need to be right all the time, please be right?This for entertainment,we can't change anything,plus we want you to keep posting!Please give Mistergoggle a break,he is one of those guys who can see another person's point! We need him to keep posting also!Remember what we learned in Kindergarden,how to play nice,take a nap,eat a good lunch,play well with others!


Muslims coming in by the hundreds, great job Obama,now the Muslims are killing our people over seas,on you tube,but we should feel sorry for the illegals? Sorry I feel sorry for the Americans,who made this country great.Does anybody know what the Anti Christ looks like? I think I do !


Do you get a glimpse while you shave?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

mistergoogle , you are a Liberal, I knew it, a lot of paragraphs that mean nothing.You should run for President!


Lobo, after we nuke every Muslim, let's nuke the border!

yankeefan2014 yankeefan2014
Aug '14

Hey, Lobo just caught me for being a liberal.

He be quick study that one he be.

But I give him credit for being nice and not throwing the Euro Socialist Marxist Communist Muslim Obamafreebie loving........whatever.

Good job!

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

I think we should all cross over the border,and see what happens! Come on lets do it,there is no problem, you can come and go as you want.Free from taxes,we could let the illegals fund all there own needs,run this country, and we can become the friendly nation that Obama wants!Do you think he would make them pay taxes,and pay for Obama care,and join the military and fight for there new country?English could be a second language,could you imagine the cost of the meal plan in the schools.They will then have everything they came here for.It's great to be an American,let them try it!


Mr. G, that's pretty good! I got NOTHING coherent out of it at all.

Yankeefan2014 Yankeefan2014
Aug '14

FYI

Thus, it’s not surprising to hear that the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) is already talking to Mexican drug cartels. Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX), a member of the House Judiciary Committee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, said as much on Newmax TV’s “America’s Forum” on Wednesday when asked if there’s any interaction between the two.

“My opinion is yes,” he replied. “There seems to be at least a talking to each other. How much? I don’t know. But ... drug cartels use the same operational plan as terrorist groups do. They kill their opponents, they behead their opponents, they brag about it and they have operational control of many portions of the southern border of the United States. Mexico doesn't. The United States doesn't. Otherwise they wouldn't be crossing daily with their drugs. They’re as vicious as some of these other terrorist organizations. We need to recognize them that this is an organized international crime group. And we have to deal with them as such.”

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

That's a LOBO low brow low blow Yankee :>)

OMG Old Gent, Ted Poe did not offer one shred of evidence beyond "IN MY OPINION." There is no other collaborating person, story, etc.

Perhaps it is true. Perhaps ISIS wants to sell drugs or the Mexican cartels want to convert to radical ISLAM. Somehow both groups seem to have a blocking agent in their respective agendas.

Perhaps the Cartels want to destroy America so they can sell more drugs. Or perhaps ISIS likes tacos.

Certainly ISIS and the cartel are both groups of sadists using the sadistic methods to control populations. Beyond that and Ted Poe's opinion, there is nothing else on the table to support this yet.

When are newscasters going to speak up when idiots blurt out crap. Makes great ratings to let people spread compost.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

He happens to be a member of OUR congress on the House Judiciary Committee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security committee,. He knows a lot more than you or I do about the topic. Yes it is a judgement call. Just take it for what it's is worth. You are expecting to much from the press. They make personal judgments all day long.

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

They send the national guard to Missouri , there marching in New York, they are blanketing the news,Why not send the national guard to mexico and get our Marine out ?Why isn't that on the Liberal news,2,4,7! Four people murdered by a extreme Muslim, brutally shot all of them,by the way he came in through Mexico.These are Americans that are being killed.Now all these children that came in to the country,Obama is going to let the enter the school system? Start looking in your pockets,you know its coming,food ,shots, clothes,housing,etc. Yawn, got to go,it's time to raise my flag,pay my taxes,turn off the news,and wait-------------------------------------------------and wait======================and wait!


Extreme Muslim, four dead, US, Mexico, what?

Old Gent, what you and I and Ted Poe said are all correct but it is opinion. And I have little doubt that when ISIS does come that the Mexican border is as likely as the Canadian, or the East/West coasts. Remember, of the thousands of Westerners joining ISIS, many have legal passports and Visas and would stick out more in Mexico than at any other entry point.

My point was the rationale for the Cartels to join ISIS seems weak. What's in it for them? Disrupting the American way of life, our economy, ruins their business. And the only way you can join ISIS is to become radical Muslim. They kill everyone else. Pretty sure they are anti drug too but really don't know.

The fact that both groups use the same inhuman techniques of sadism and brutality brings out the obvious truth that bad people exist throughout the world

So sure, Ted might be right. But he offers no proof beyond his credentials. We have had a lot of credentialed zealots lie to us over the years. Fact is ISIS is coming and they are smarter than Al Qaeda and they are better funded, funding we can not smash and grab like we did Al Qaeda. First off, we need to destroy them. In doing so, we need to establish barriers on all our borders including connections from anywhere in the world since they could be stepping off literally any plane or boat.

Every day that Obama waits to destroy those revenue-producing ISIS owned oil wells is another Million dollars in their bed rolls; we need to stop that NOW.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

old gent and ted poe are right and mg is of the wrong opinion once again, (mg has a very high batting average in this i might add)

radical muslims use every means at their disposal to weaken the unconverted heathens, (that includes the USA btw)

while the Qu'ran forbids it to be addicted to drugs, the radicalized Muslims misquote the Qu'ran' instructions that it's ok to use any force necessary to subdue the unfaithful. they use drug smuggling, they grow poppies for the heroine market just to help addict and weaken the ones they are trying to conquer, they have been doing this for thousands of years. they know it's bad, but use all methods to conquer their targets. that's anyone who doesn't believe like they do.

using the mexican drug cartels as a delivery system not only brings in more revenue for them, but serves to make drug addicts out of as many americans as they can in order to further weaken our society. it is part of their strategy and has been for a very long time.

ISIS has promised to see us in NYC. and they mean what they say. using the drug running Mexican cartels to ferry not only high strength heroine but also terrorist operatives across an already wide ope and unprotected border (thanks to obama and his race baiting attorney general eric holder)


btw mg, "dead wrong" ? not bloody likely, i happen to know things that you don't think i know. so you would be well advised that actions have consequences

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Aug '14

Name one thing you know that I don't think you know you know? Just wondering.

And what consequences are you threatening?

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Aug '14

Great news, if your broke, out of work,can't afford health care,afraid to travel to other countries , you can still take a vacation down at our Mexican border,its free,just drive there check in or not,enjoy your stay,if you need food just walk over to the many free meals being given out,you can go on free tours,and look over you next free vacation,and where you will enter.Please when you get home,send the white house a thank you note,they did make this a friendly nation,and you can do anything you want.


My friends, the border is not just Obama fault. It's the influence of big business's and there MONEY's over years, It has never been secure. Obama Is just escalating the problem to his advantage. I just laugh at all the people that have so much faith and trust in the Government to solve anything that is not self serving in the end. Like I wrote the other day. When the Constitution became a living document. PARTY ON !!!!

Old Gent Old Gent
Aug '14

The border is over-run, all right....by bat scientists.

http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/26431681/armed-border-militia-confronts-conservationists-counting-bats

LeRoy Grimace LeRoy Grimace
Sep '14

Looks like there's going to be a delay in the presidents decisions on immigration reform until after the November elections. Must have read some polling and found it wasn't a good idea for democrats who are up for reelection.


Yeah, that's probably the politically adept thing to do unfortunately. Not like anyone else is going to actually pass any laws over it, no one likes it when he takes action, so why poke the bear.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Sep '14

Wouldn't it be nice if we just had politicians ran on something and stuck to it. And I mean that on both sides of the aisle.


http://www.examiner.com/article/two-unaccompanied-minors-carjack-elderly-man-iowa

Two 'unaccompanied minors' carjack elderly man in Iowa

On Wednesday, police arrested two Guatemalan nationals, ages 16 and 17, following a high speed chase which ended on Interstate 80, just outside Iowa City.

Around 6 a.m., the pair walked out of Maryville Academy in Des Plaines, Ill., and committed their first carjacking of the day. They then drove 165 miles to a Walmart in Moline, Iowa, where they ordered a 91-year-old man out of his car, according to police.

Moline Police Det. Scott Williams stated: "They obviously chose him to take his vehicle. He walked with a cane. They watched him go in and get his medication from the VA."

The illegal aliens smashed into a car on the way out of the parking lot, driving another 220 miles in the stolen vehicle, until so-called 'stop sticks' were thrown in their path by Iowa state troopers. Their actions were captured on store surveillance video.

The two suspects came to the U.S. in the recent surge of illegal aliens flooding across our border from Central America and Mexico.


The teens had been transferred to the Illinois facility after crossing the US-Mexico border as unaccompanied minors and requesting asylum in the United States.

LV Mom
Oct '14

From Breitbart, ( a "source" ) you likely favor:

According to the Times, while there were 208 reported carjackings in the entire state in 2007, there have been 475 carjackings in 2013 in Essex County alone. They note that, in contrast, New York City has seen only 159, though most of Newark is significantly more driver-friendly than much of Manhattan and Brooklyn. Perpetrators have targeted public officials and off-duty police as well as laymen driving into and out of the city.

Any particular reason these carjackings weren't worthy of your cut and paste pot stirring?

yankeefan yankeefan
Oct '14

can we request 'asylum' from the two teens i wonder ?

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Oct '14

BD, somehow the word asylum seems so appropriate for you...as in "escaped from".

yankeefan yankeefan
Oct '14

I don't know Yankee, it just does not seem like appropriate asylum actions really. "give me your tired, your hungry, your poor excuse for a human......"

Now what? It's going to get weird because we probably legally can't deport em, so three squares a day at lockup unless we really get soft and send em to juve. Guess they decided they really LIKE asylum and now we can foot the bill for years.

I say put them in hard time for minimum possible to make victim feel better and then deport em upon release. They won't be kids needing protection anymore.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Oct '14

Mexico Paying Illegals Legal Fees to avoid deportation

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/10/Mexican-Gov-t-Paying-to-Help-Shield-Illegal-Immigrants-in-the-U-S-From-Deportation/

We will never learn. The stupidity of the general populace as we continue to allow laws to be selectively enforced as we are overrun by crime and disease.


Just wait till ebola breaks out in central america and mexico - it's probably inevitable at this point. Think the border will be secured when millions start swarming the border? ha!

Old Sam
Oct '14

Wow. Just wow.

Justintime Justintime
Oct '14

Obama says illegal immigration hurts ‘blue-collar Americans,’ strains welfare:

President Barack Obama once declared that an influx of illegal immigrants will harm “the wages of blue-collar Americans” and “put strains on an already overburdened safety net.”

“There’s no denying that many blacks share the same anxieties as many whites about the wave of illegal immigration flooding our Southern border—a sense that what’s happening now is fundamentally different from what has gone on before,” then-Senator Obama wrote in his 2006 autobiography, “The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.”

”Not all these fears are irrational,” he wrote.

“The number of immigrants added to the labor force every year is of a magnitude not seen in this country for over a century,” Obama noted. “If this huge influx of mostly low-skill workers provides some benefits to the economy as a whole—especially by keeping our workforce young, in contrast to an increasingly geriatric Europe and Japan—it also threatens to depress further the wages of blue-collar Americans and put strains on an already overburdened safety net.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/16/shock-flashback-obama-says-illegal-immigration-hurts-blue-collar-americans-strains-welfare-video/

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Nov '14

What's your point? The Obama administration has deported in excess of 1.8 million illegal immigrants through September of 2014, and is on track to easily exceed 2 million by the end of the year.

Yankeefan Yankeefan
Nov '14

President Barack Obama once declared that an influx of illegal immigrants will harm “the wages of blue-collar Americans” and “put strains on an already overburdened safety net.”

seems like BHO sings a different tune now,

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Nov '14

And there's going to 5 million more coming and counting.


Point is yankeeman, bho talks out of both sides of his mouth (and every other orifice as well). The obamanite "deportation" numbers are bogus as well - some time back, the numbers of those illegals stopped at the border and (surprisingly) turned back,
have been added to the actual deportations thus skewing the number to make him look "tougher"

OldSam
Nov '14

Just close it, like just pay taxes,deport them, simple,why is this our problem?We make this all a big mess,and fuss ! Close the Borders,deport, less strain on our money,less sickness,this thread will go on forever! What would happen if we all crossed into Mexico,and wanted food, clothing,medical,work,etc.would they keep us,would it take this long for them to send us back?That's your answer,treat them, like they would treat us!


i SO agree, LoBo!!!!!

mom of one mom of one
Nov '14

Re: US Southern Border being over run?

"bho talks out of both sides of his mouth (and every other orifice as well). The obamanite "deportation" numbers are bogus as well - some time back, the numbers of those illegals stopped at the border and (surprisingly) turned back,
have been added to the actual deportations thus skewing the number to make him look "tougher""

Once again the conservative claptrap cacophony of caustic commentary fills the void. Of course, not sourced, unsubstantiated, and just plain mean.

Fact is exclusions (people turned back at the border) have been included in deportation statistics since 1996; that's even before Cheney, I mean Bush was President. Obama was still running for his first state office when you blame him for lying to you on this one.

With that in mind, I think the picture speaks for itself. "Blows the doors off" previous administrations comes to mind as a description.

That said, you just have to laugh as the new Republican powerhouse grumbles that it needs time, more time, perhaps eight months into next year, to come up with immigration reform legislations. Here's a buck, buy a clue answer men.

Meanwhile, the neo-con advance guard of the airwaves talks like Lobo talks that it's all about sickness, taxes, work, etc. I think he's just mad that he had to quit his standing-on-the-corner day job, too much competition, and now he can't find good migrant farm work anymore; not to mention that he gets more from illegal alien taxes than they ever get from him.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Nov '14

“There’s no denying that many blacks share the same anxieties as many whites about the wave of illegal immigration flooding our Southern border—a sense that what’s happening now is fundamentally different from what has gone on before”

BHO 2006

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Nov '14

mistergoogle,sorry can't find room on the corner,it's filled with illegal day workers,who don't pay taxes,also don't know if there sick or not? Sounds like you and Obama are on the same page, it's called The End.It's pretty cold down town,you should bring them coffee! It's great that you carry on and say nothing,we all get a kick out of it!


Bottom line neither party has ever been serious about addressing the problem, and neither party ever will. The invasion started a long time ago, and the war is lost. The day's of political compromise are long gone. It's party first, country second. The Republican's never really wanted to stop illegal immigration, too much cheap labor for business. The Democrats rely on the hispanic voting block, 75% to 23% in the last presidential election, and will never do anything either. No one party or president is to blame, they all are.

Denis Denis
Nov '14

true Denis, very true, agreed

BrotherDog BrotherDog
Nov '14

Once again the conservative claptrap cacophony of caustic commentary fills the void. Of course, not sourced, unsubstantiated and just plain mean".

wow, you sound like William F. Buckley, I'm impressed or you been looking at your Roget's again?


How about this one googleman

"the statistics are actually a little deceptive because what we've been doing is, with the stronger border enforcement, we've been apprehending folks at the border and sending them back. That is counted as a deportation even though they may have held for a day or 48 hours and sent back - that's counted as a deportation"

Quote from your savior, Barrack Hussein Obama, October 2011

Fact is, interior apprehensions and removals have decreased - 19% from 11 to 12 and 22% from 12 to 13 alone. Your little chart is reflective of the numbers claimed to have been removed by ICE but, the year to year increase is due to caseload change from CBP to ICE not real numbers or, no longer apples and apples. In 2012 alone more than one half of the number reported (409k) would have been CBP returns in previous years. Reality is, ICE removals are down as are total deportations (border apprehensions plus removals) from a high of 1.9 mil (under Clinton believe it or not) to less than 800k under bho. Spend some time with Center For Immigration Studies data googleman, you will find some real data.

Fact is, I never stated that border returns were not included in the total deportation (returns and removals) number only that the obamanites have cooked the books by changing methodology to make him look better.

Fact is googleman unlike you, I actually despise most politicians, just some more than others.

OldSam
Nov '14

If this is such a fabulous idea why didn't he announce it before the election? Or do it the constitutional way when he both the house and the senate.


I hear Obama is going to be addressing the nation regarding his plan for Immigration Reform at 8pm on Thursday. CBS, FOX and NBC have decided that they are not going to pre-empt their regularly scheduled programming for it, and according to them, the White House hasn't asked them to. ABC is undecided. Univision will be disrupting the Latin Grammys in order to show it, though...

ianimal ianimal
Nov '14

This says it all.

http://safeshare.tv/w/eUqDmyBbir

kb2755 kb2755
Nov '14

Did he include himself in the Immigration reform?


""the statistics are actually a little deceptive because what we've been doing is, with the stronger border enforcement, we've been apprehending folks at the border and sending them back. That is counted as a deportation even though they may have held for a day or 48 hours and sent back - that's counted as a deportation"

Quote from your savior, Barrack Hussein Obama, October 2011"

So? It's the same deception since 1996 and "the obamanites" have not changed the methodology since then. Matter of fact, they are using the same methodology and reporting schema as the Bush Administration. Cant' speak for previous.

Fact is if you want to look tough, with big numbers, you use removals and returns. If you want to "cherry pick" because one or the other look better, you do so. And everything is called a deportation so basically anything goes.

"The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) "is a politically conservative non-profit research organization that advocates immigration reduction in the United States." (WIKI) --- No bias possibility there. How about one of it's favorite sons and creator: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/us/17immig.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

As much as I hate to read their racist hate crap, I will go through this once I get a break, but pretty sure your numbers are bogus.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Nov '14

If you look back in history you will see that the Republicans inadvertently[I think I spelled that right] started the dream act.

Back in the early 1970s president Richard Nixon either real or imagined had and enemies list people and organizations he thought were enemies of the Republican party.

One of the top people on that list was John Lennon he was on that list because he had announced he would do a series of concerts to get people registered to vote and to help George McGoverns campaign. President Nixon secretly had the FBI and immigration spy on John Lennon read his mail tap is telephone and follow him to build a case of deportation and as we all know John Lennon won his deportation trial and the same laws brought forth by the courts then are now the basis of the dream act

oldred
Nov '14

Kick them the Hell Out of this country MY WIFE CAME HERE LEAGALLY!!!!! Its a slap in the face to her and others like her!!!!

Mr Negative Mr Negative
Nov '14

OK, OldSam, finally walked through the numbers. Sorry for the length, but just answering your CIS allegations.

First off, there are two main deportation categories; removals meaning illegal, criminal, and/or having made it successfully across the border in the US and returns --- being turned back at the border before getting in. Since everything is now called a deportation, you can use the first, the second or both and term it deportation, which everyone does. When you want to see a HUGE number, you use both like Obama and Bush have frequently done. Can’t speak to previous Presidents but I am sure they dabbled between choices under the monolithic “deportation” moniker as well. When you want to show percentage increase or decrease you might cherry pick one column or another as CIS likes to do. Many times journalists and others are frankly too stupid to know which column(s) they are using, this incompetence adds to the confusion.

Minor point but there is a difference. Returns are welcome basically to try again; removals do so at the risk of immediate incarceration.

It seems everyone uses the famous Table 39 from Homeland Security found here: http://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigration-statistics-2011-3. Your quote: Fact is, interior apprehensions and removals have decreased - 19% from 11 to 12 and 22% from 12 to 13 alone cannot be substantiated from that table but it can be refuted, thus it appears bogus since CIS refers to the table. According to table 39, removals have increased every year except one since 2008, an average of 6% per year and as high as 13%. They are the largest numbers in history, about 400,000 removals per year. Unless I missed something, CIS lies. This is what my chart indicated.

I believe CIS’s and your claim of caseload change from CBP to ICE is moot; these are totals for the US Government, all organizations. It’s one of many red herrings CIS throws up to feed your fear of government spin; if you make up enough untrue spin techniques piled on top of the two columns being called deportations, useful idiots will believe you.

Second, when you say “Reality is, ICE removals are down as are total deportations (border apprehensions plus removals) from a high of 1.9 mil (under Clinton believe it or not) to less than 800k under bho,” CIS and you have picked the highest possible deportation total in the year 2000 in over 120 years of tracking. We can let that be but remember you applauded CIS factuality when in truth they spin and cherry pick to server their mission of zero immigration. Since 2000, the deportation number immediately fell close to 40% over the next two years and has fallen every year for 13 years, except one.

So yeah, Obama deports more entrenched illegals from the US interior than any other President in history and increases removals at about 6% per year (see graph in earlier tome). He is cleaning out more entrenched illegals than anyone else has period. At the same time, the total number of deportations, due to less returns at the border, has fallen every year except one since our 120-year high in year 2000 and Obama enjoys the same trend with the lowest return rate in modern history.

The only piece of the puzzle is how many make it across and good luck with that but most conclude that the border strategy has gotten better with Bush and even better with Obama.

mistergoogle mistergoogle
Nov '14

http://news.yahoo.com/dutch-reject-un-call-feed-shelter-homeless-migrants-222055938.html

Send them here. No Problem. Come on over. We need them.

Old Gent Old Gent
Dec '14

The refugees,
I guess they are not too disparate
http://news.yahoo.com/finlands-no-good-disappointed-migrants-turn-back-152042061.html

Old Gent Old Gent
Sep '15

Any wall separating the USA and Canada?

I think I'll escape there --- the way my draft dodging buddies did in the 60s.

Of course, I'll be back when the weather gets cold(-;

Andy Loigu Andy Loigu
Sep '15

Back to the Top | View all Forum Topics
This topic has not been commented on in 3 years.
Commenting is no longer available.